Response of taro to varying water regimes and soil textures

被引:0
|
作者
Li M. [1 ]
Deus A.C.F. [2 ]
Ming L.C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept. of Horticulture, Agronomical Sciences College, São Paulo State Univ., José Barbosa of Barros St., 1780, Botucatu, SP
[2] Dept. of Soil and Environmental Resources, Agronomical Sciences College, São Paulo State Univ., José Barbosa of Barros St., 1780, Botucatu, SP
来源
关键词
Canopy size; Corm yield; Irrigation; Soil type; Water-use efficiency (WUE);
D O I
10.1061/(asce)ir.1943-4774.0001373
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Taro [Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott] is a major root crop widely distributed in the tropics and subtropics. However, little information is available on its water stress tolerance under different soil textures. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of five water regimes (20%, 60%, 100%, 140%, and 180% ETc-crop water requirement) and three soil textures (clay, sandy clay loam, and sandy soil) on the growth, yield, and water-use efficiency (WUE) of taro. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse, and two harvests of taro were analyzed. In both harvests, leaf number (LN), leaf area (LA), and corm yield (Yc) were lower at 20% and 60% ETc when compared with 100% ETc, and higher at 140% ETc and 180% ETc when compared with 100% ETc. Sandy soil (SS) exhibited higher LN at all water regimes than clay soil (CS) and sandy clay loam (SCL) soil. For LA, the values found in SS were higher at lower water regimes (20% and 60% ETc). In the three types of soil, WUE was significantly higher at 20% ETc, 1.00 and 0.51 kgm-3, respectively, in the first and second harvests compared with the other water regimes. In the second harvest, WUE and Yc were significantly higher in SS compared with CS and SCL, indicating that SS has greater potential to improve the WUE of taro under limited water availability conditions. © 2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Black carbon decomposition under varying water regimes
    Nguyen, Binh Thanh
    Lehmann, Johannes
    ORGANIC GEOCHEMISTRY, 2009, 40 (08) : 846 - 853
  • [22] Soil microbial response, water and nitrogen use by tomato under different irrigation regimes
    Li, Xiaoliang
    Liu, Fulai
    Li, Guitong
    Lin, Qimei
    Jensen, Christian R.
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2010, 98 (03) : 414 - 418
  • [23] RESPONSE OF CREEPING BLUESTEM TO VARYING MONTH OF BURN AND SOIL-WATER CONDITIONS
    KALMBACHER, R
    MARTIN, FG
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 1995, 5 (02) : 93 - 99
  • [24] Estimating in situ soil–water retention and field water capacity in two contrasting soil textures
    J. D. Jabro
    R. G. Evans
    Y. Kim
    W. M. Iversen
    Irrigation Science, 2009, 27 : 223 - 229
  • [25] OBSERVATIONS ON SOIL-WATER REGIMES IN A DRAINED CLAY SOIL
    TRAFFORD, BD
    RYCROFT, DW
    JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1973, 24 (03): : 380 - 391
  • [26] Surface soil water content regimes: Opportunities in soil science
    Nielsen, DR
    Kutilek, M
    Parlange, MB
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1996, 184 (1-2) : 35 - 55
  • [27] Grape response to different soil moisture regimes
    Zabihi, HR
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON GRAPEVINE GROWING, COMMERCE AND RESEARCH, 2004, (652): : 233 - 237
  • [28] Yield response of tomatoes to soil moisture regimes
    Rahman, HAA
    Elias, SA
    Baguhin, G
    ARAB GULF JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, 1995, 13 (03): : 511 - 520
  • [29] Water Productivity and Soil Chemical Properties under Varying Water Regimes on Spring Rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Hanoi, Vietnam
    Ngo Thanh Son
    Badayos, Rodrigo B.
    Sanchez, Pearl B.
    Cruz, Pompe C. Sta.
    Van Dung, Nguyen
    Nguyen Huu Thanh
    PHILIPPINE JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE, 2008, 33 (03): : 56 - 70
  • [30] Evaluation of continuous in situ monitoring of soil changes with varying flooding regimes
    Unger, Irene M.
    Muzika, Rose-Marie
    Motavalli, Peter P.
    Kabrick, John
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2008, 39 (11-12) : 1600 - 1619