AAPM Task Group Report 307: Use of EPIDs for Patient-Specific IMRT and VMAT QA

被引:0
|
作者
Dogan N. [1 ]
Mijnheer B.J. [2 ]
Padgett K. [1 ]
Nalichowski A. [3 ]
Wu C. [4 ]
Nyflot M.J. [5 ]
Olch A.J. [6 ]
Papanikolaou N. [7 ]
Shi J. [8 ]
Holmes S.M. [9 ]
Moran J. [10 ]
Greer P.B. [11 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
[2] Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam
[3] Department of Radiation Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI
[4] Department of Radiation Oncology, Sutter Medical Foundation, Roseville, CA
[5] Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
[6] Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, and Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
[7] Division of Medical Physics, UT Health-MD Anderson, San Antonio, TX
[8] Sun Nuclear Corporation – A Mirion Medical Company, Melbourne, FL
[9] Standard Imaging, Inc., Middleton, WI
[10] Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
[11] Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Newcastle, NSW
[12] School of Information and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW
关键词
electronic portal imaging device; EPID; EPID QA; IMRT/VMAT QA; patient-specific EPID QA;
D O I
10.1002/mp.16536
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) have been widely utilized for patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) and their use for transit dosimetry applications is emerging. Yet there are no specific guidelines on the potential uses, limitations, and correct utilization of EPIDs for these purposes. The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 307 (TG-307) provides a comprehensive review of the physics, modeling, algorithms and clinical experience with EPID-based pre-treatment and transit dosimetry techniques. This review also includes the limitations and challenges in the clinical implementation of EPIDs, including recommendations for commissioning, calibration and validation, routine QA, tolerance levels for gamma analysis and risk-based analysis. Methods: Characteristics of the currently available EPID systems and EPID-based PSQA techniques are reviewed. The details of the physics, modeling, and algorithms for both pre-treatment and transit dosimetry methods are discussed, including clinical experience with different EPID dosimetry systems. Commissioning, calibration, and validation, tolerance levels and recommended tests, are reviewed, and analyzed. Risk-based analysis for EPID dosimetry is also addressed. Results: Clinical experience, commissioning methods and tolerances for EPID-based PSQA system are described for pre-treatment and transit dosimetry applications. The sensitivity, specificity, and clinical results for EPID dosimetry techniques are presented as well as examples of patient-related and machine-related error detection by these dosimetry solutions. Limitations and challenges in clinical implementation of EPIDs for dosimetric purposes are discussed and acceptance and rejection criteria are outlined. Potential causes of and evaluations of pre-treatment and transit dosimetry failures are discussed. Guidelines and recommendations developed in this report are based on the extensive published data on EPID QA along with the clinical experience of the TG-307 members. Conclusion: TG-307 focused on the commercially available EPID-based dosimetric tools and provides guidance for medical physicists in the clinical implementation of EPID-based patient-specific pre-treatment and transit dosimetry QA solutions including intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatments. © 2023 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:e865 / e903
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Moving from measurements toward independent computer calculations for patient-specific IMRT QA
    Pawlicki, T.
    Yoo, S.
    Russell, J.
    Boyer, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2123 - 2124
  • [42] Machine Learning with Radiomic Features to Detect the Types of Errors in IMRT Patient-Specific QA
    Sakai, M.
    Koarai, H.
    Ueda, M.
    Shigeta, S.
    Nakano, H.
    Takizawa, T.
    Tanabe, S.
    Sasamoto, R.
    Aoyama, H.
    Utsunomiya, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E196 - E196
  • [43] Verification and documentation for patient-specific IMRT QA using varis and portal vision systems
    Nurushev, T
    Kim, J
    Yin, FF
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (06) : 1501 - 1501
  • [44] The Extraction of True Profiles for TPS Commissioning and Its Impact On IMRT Patient-Specific QA
    Yan, G.
    Fox, C.
    Liu, C.
    Li, J. G.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [45] Results of a Provincial Survey on Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Practice for IMRT and VMAT Delivery
    King, Jenna
    Abdellatif, Ady
    Bissonnette, Jean-Pierre
    Buckley, Lesley
    Chan, Gordon
    Chin, Lee
    Comsa, Daria
    Himmelman, Julie
    Rapley, Patrick
    Vandermeer, Aaron
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (11) : 5377 - 5377
  • [46] Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based verification QA: Recommendations of AAPM Task Group No. 218
    Miften, Moyed
    Olch, Arthur
    Mihailidis, Dimitris
    Moran, Jean
    Pawlicki, Todd
    Molineu, Andrea
    Li, Harold
    Wijesooriya, Krishni
    Shi, Jie
    Xia, Ping
    Papanikolaou, Nikos
    Low, Daniel A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (04) : E53 - E83
  • [47] Evaluation of a 2D detector array for patient-specific VMAT QA with different setups
    Boggula, Ramesh
    Birkner, Mattias
    Lohr, Frank
    Steil, Volker
    Wenz, Frederik
    Wertz, Hansjoerg
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (22): : 7163 - 7177
  • [48] Impact of plan parameters and modulation indices on patient-specific QA results for standard and stereotactic VMAT
    Chun, Minsoo
    An, Hyun Joon
    Kwon, Ohyun
    Oh, Do Hoon
    Park, Jong Min
    Kim, Jung-in
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 62 : 83 - 94
  • [49] Correlation of phantom-based and log file patient-specific QA with complexity scores for VMAT
    Agnew, Christina E.
    Irvine, Denise M.
    McGarry, Conor K.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 15 (06): : 204 - 216
  • [50] Correlation between tolerances for EPID metrics and CI dose deviation for patient-specific VMAT QA
    Martin, G.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S1470 - S1472