Opinion dynamics model in social networks with heterogeneous nodes

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou Q.-Y. [1 ]
Wu Z.-B. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Business, Sichuan University, Chengdu
来源
Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision | 2023年 / 38卷 / 01期
关键词
anticonformity; authority; conformity; independence; opinion dynamics; social networks;
D O I
10.13195/j.kzyjc.2021.0941
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Internet has accelerated the public opinion formation, and public opinion discussions are happening all the time. In order to explore the influence of heterogenous agents on opinion evolution, this paper modifies the traditional DeGroot model and considers the opinion evolution where different kinds of agents coexist in the social network. Agents are divided into authority and non-authority. From the perspective of social psychology, the non-authoritative agents are randomly classified into conformists, anticonformists and independent agents. To overcome the shortcoming of the traditional DeGroot model in determining weights, a new weight determination method is proposed by introducing the eigenvector centrality of nodes. There are two stages in each time step of the proposed model. In the first stage, all agents update their opinions through the DeGroot method. In the second stage, the anticonformists and independent agents are assumed to adjust their opinions obtained in the first stage. Simulation results in the connected Erdös-Rényi networks show that the conformists reach a consensus with the authority and the consensus is determined by the authority’s opinion. The anticonformists form their opinion clusters that are far away from the conformists and the authority. The stable opinions of the independent agents are scattered between the anticonformists and authority and are closer to the consensus of the conformists and the authority. © 2023 Northeast University. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 264
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] Wang J, Chen F P., Analysis of structural features of public opinion dissemination network for emergency events based on SNA — Take Jiangsu Xiangshui “3.21 explosive accident”as an example, Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China: Social Sciences Edition, 23, 1, pp. 10-18, (2021)
  • [22] Chu J F, Liu Y C, Wang Y M., Group preference relations decision making approach based on social network adjacency relations, Control and Decision, 36, 4, pp. 983-992, (2021)
  • [23] Zhang Z Z, Zhou S G, Fang J Q., Recent progress of deterministic models for complex networks, Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 5, 4, pp. 29-46, (2008)
  • [24] Pareto V., Manual of political economy, pp. 12-20, (1971)
  • [25] Ding Z G, Chen X, Dong Y C, Et al., Consensus reaching in social network DeGroot model: The roles of the self-confidence and node degree, Information Sciences, 486, pp. 62-72, (2019)
  • [26] Erdos P, Renyi A., On the evolution of random graphs, Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, 38, 4, pp. 343-347, (1960)