Opinion dynamics model in social networks with heterogeneous nodes

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou Q.-Y. [1 ]
Wu Z.-B. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Business, Sichuan University, Chengdu
来源
Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision | 2023年 / 38卷 / 01期
关键词
anticonformity; authority; conformity; independence; opinion dynamics; social networks;
D O I
10.13195/j.kzyjc.2021.0941
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Internet has accelerated the public opinion formation, and public opinion discussions are happening all the time. In order to explore the influence of heterogenous agents on opinion evolution, this paper modifies the traditional DeGroot model and considers the opinion evolution where different kinds of agents coexist in the social network. Agents are divided into authority and non-authority. From the perspective of social psychology, the non-authoritative agents are randomly classified into conformists, anticonformists and independent agents. To overcome the shortcoming of the traditional DeGroot model in determining weights, a new weight determination method is proposed by introducing the eigenvector centrality of nodes. There are two stages in each time step of the proposed model. In the first stage, all agents update their opinions through the DeGroot method. In the second stage, the anticonformists and independent agents are assumed to adjust their opinions obtained in the first stage. Simulation results in the connected Erdös-Rényi networks show that the conformists reach a consensus with the authority and the consensus is determined by the authority’s opinion. The anticonformists form their opinion clusters that are far away from the conformists and the authority. The stable opinions of the independent agents are scattered between the anticonformists and authority and are closer to the consensus of the conformists and the authority. © 2023 Northeast University. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:257 / 264
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Xu X., Opinion representative: The content hierarchy and its cohesion in micro blog society, Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China: Social Sciences Edition, 23, 2, pp. 38-47, (2021)
  • [2] Zhu C K, Qian Y J., Research on the communication mechanism of public emergencies on mainstream media’s microblogs, Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China: Social Sciences Edition, 22, 5, pp. 1-10, (2020)
  • [3] Wu J H, Chen H Y, Wang W S., Interaction and production model of public opinion based on Agent’s emotional persuasion, Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 27, 1, pp. 249-259, (2021)
  • [4] Yu T Y, Xiao R B, Hou J D., Modeling and simulation of online public opinion structure reversal: Based on an improved deffuant model, Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 16, 3, pp. 30-39, (2019)
  • [5] French J J R P., A formal theory of social power, Psychological Review, 63, 3, pp. 181-194, (1956)
  • [6] Degroot M H., Reaching a consensus, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 345, pp. 118-121, (1974)
  • [7] Weisbuch G, Deffuant G, Amblard F, Et al., Meet, discuss, and segregate, Complexity, 7, 3, pp. 55-63, (2002)
  • [8] Hegselmann R, Krause U., Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, andsimulation, The Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5, 3, (2002)
  • [9] Gao W F., Examining public opinion guidance and governance in major epidemic situation from wechat moments, Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China: Social Sciences Edition, 22, 3, pp. 30-35, (2020)
  • [10] Wu X L, Liu X F, Zhou J., Evolution model of NIMBY opinion based on public perception and governmental guidance, Systems Engineering — Theory & Practice, 39, 11, pp. 2865-2879, (2019)