Landslide Susceptibility Prediction Considering Spatio-Temporal Division Principle of Training/Testing Datasets in Machine Learning Models

被引:0
|
作者
Huang, Faming [1 ,2 ]
Ouyang, Weiping [1 ]
Jiang, Shuihua [1 ]
Fan, Xuanmei [2 ]
Lian, Zhipeng [3 ]
Zhou, Chuangbing [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Infrastructure Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang,330031, China
[2] State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu,610059, China
[3] Wuhan Center, China Geological Survey, Wuhan,430205, China
关键词
Environmental factors - Landslide susceptibility - Machine learning models - Multilayers perceptrons - Prediction modelling - Spatial datasets - Support vectors machine - Times series - Training/testing dataset - Uncertainty;
D O I
10.3799/dqkx.2022.357
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In most of the landslide susceptibility prediction (LSP) models, the landslide-non landslide spatial datasets are divided into training/testing datasets according to the principle of spatial random, however, this spatial randomness division inevitably introduces uncertainties into LSP modelling. Theoretically, LSP modelling is based on past landslide inventories to predict the spatial probability of future landslides, which has significant time series characteristics rather than only spatial random characteristics. Therefore, we believe that it is necessary to divide spatial datasets into the model training/testing datasets based on the time series of landslide occurrence. Taking Wencheng County in China as an example, 11 types of environmental factors and 128 time-accurate landslides are obtained; Then, the landslide and non-landslide samples connected with environmental factors are divided into two different types of training/testing datasets according to the principles of landslide time series and spatial random, respectively. The division ratios of training/testing datasets are set as 9∶1, 8∶2, 7∶3, 6∶4 and 5∶5, respectively, to avoid the influences of different ratios on the LSP results. Thus, the training/testing datasets under 10 combined working conditions are obtained. Finally, several typical machine learning models, such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) and Random Forest (RF), are then trained and tested to perform LSP and analyze their uncertainties. Results show that: (1) The LSP uncertainties performed by the time series-based SVM, MLP and RF models are slightly lower than those by spatial random-based models, which verifies the feasibility of dividing by time series; (2) The time series division of training/testing datasets is actually adeterministiccase among the spatial random division, which is more consistent with the actual situation of landslides. Of course, it is also feasible to carry out spatial random division for training and testing datasets when lacking landslide occurrence time. © 2024 China University of Geosciences. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1607 / 1618
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A spatio-temporal network for landslide displacement prediction based on deep learning
    Luo H.
    Jiang Y.
    Xu Q.
    Liao L.
    Yan A.
    Liu C.
    [J]. Cehui Xuebao/Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2022, 51 (10): : 2160 - 2170
  • [2] Landslide Susceptibility Prediction Considering Regional Soil Erosion Based on Machine-Learning Models
    Huang, Faming
    Chen, Jiawu
    Du, Zhen
    Yao, Chi
    Huang, Jinsong
    Jiang, Qinghui
    Chang, Zhilu
    Li, Shu
    [J]. ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2020, 9 (06)
  • [3] Learning sets of sub-models for spatio-temporal prediction
    Bennett, Andrew
    Magee, Derek
    [J]. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS XXIV, 2008, : 123 - 136
  • [4] STAMP: An Approach to ETA Prediction by Spatio-temporal Discretization and Machine Learning
    Xu, Bo
    Jonietz, David
    Gupta, Rohit
    Soleymani, Ali
    Malm, Kevin
    Kohn, Reinhard
    [J]. 2022 IEEE 25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITSC), 2022, : 893 - 900
  • [5] Effect of Spatio-Temporal Granularity on Demand Prediction for Deep Learning Models
    Varghese, Ken Koshy
    Mahdaviabbasabad, Sajjad
    Gentile, Guido
    Eldafrawi, Mohamed
    [J]. TRANSPORT AND TELECOMMUNICATION JOURNAL, 2023, 24 (01) : 22 - 32
  • [6] Reservoir Landslide Susceptibility Prediction Considering Non-Landslide Sampling and Ensemble Machine Learning Methods
    Wang, Yue
    Cao, Ying
    Xu, Fangdang
    Zhou, Chao
    Yu, Lanbing
    Wu, Lixing
    Wang, Yang
    Yin, Kunlong
    [J]. Diqiu Kexue - Zhongguo Dizhi Daxue Xuebao/Earth Science - Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2024, 49 (05): : 1619 - 1635
  • [7] Spatio-temporal prediction of soil deformation in bucket excavation using machine learning
    Saku, Yuki
    Aizawa, Masanori
    Ooi, Takeshi
    Ishigami, Genya
    [J]. ADVANCED ROBOTICS, 2021, 35 (23) : 1404 - 1417
  • [8] Housing price prediction incorporating spatio-temporal dependency into machine learning algorithms
    Soltani, Ali
    Heydari, Mohammad
    Aghaei, Fatemeh
    Pettit, Christopher James
    [J]. CITIES, 2022, 131
  • [9] Spatio-temporal simulation and prediction of land-use change using conventional and machine learning models: a review
    Aburas, Maher Milad
    Ahamad, Mohd Sanusi S.
    Omar, Najat Qader
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2019, 191 (04)
  • [10] Spatio-temporal simulation and prediction of land-use change using conventional and machine learning models: a review
    Maher Milad Aburas
    Mohd Sanusi S. Ahamad
    Najat Qader Omar
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2019, 191