Estimation of willingness to pay for improved water supply service: Case of Algerian households

被引:0
|
作者
Boukhari S. [1 ]
Kertous M. [2 ]
Nassiri A. [2 ]
Maliki S.B. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of Technology and Sciences, University of Souk Ahras, Souk Ahras
[2] University of Brest, UMR 6308 AMURE (Aménagement des Usages des Ressources et des Espaces marins et littoraux), Brest
[3] Mecas Laboratory, Abou Bakr Belkaid University, Tlemcen
关键词
ADE; Algeria; contingent valuation; water supply service; willingness to pay;
D O I
10.2166/ws.2024.130
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this article is to evaluate the water company in Algeria (ADE) subscribers’ Willingness To Pay (WTP) for a better service offer. This study assessed the WTP for improved drinking water in the department of Souk-Ahras (Algeria), using contingent valuation survey data of 5,342 households, with a response rate of 10.86% (greater than 10% of each municipality’s total number of subscribers). Then, Probit and Tobit models were applied to analyze the determinants of WTP. The results show that the majority of respondents (62.84%) testified that they were not satisfied with the quality of the service provided in terms of quantity and quality of the water distributed. This research revealed that the WTP for an improved water supply service was approximately 16.18 Algerian dinar (DZD)/m3 (approximately 0.11 US$/m3) instead of the current tariff (6.3 DZD/m3–0.04 US$ /m3). With this new water tariff, the average water charge for a household is around 1.37% of the average monthly income. © 2024 IWA Publishing. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2024 / 2038
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ESTIMATION OF WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT SERVICE IMPROVEMENT IN MALAYSIA
    Munusami, Chandramalar
    Othman, Jamal
    Ismail, Shaharuddin Mohamad
    Siwar, Chamhuri
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND SOCIETY, 2016, 17 (02): : 365 - 374
  • [42] Estimation of farmers' willingness to pay for water in the agricultural sector
    Bozorg-Haddad, Omid
    Malmir, Marzieh
    Mohammad-Azari, Sahar
    Loaiciga, Hugo A.
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2016, 177 : 284 - 290
  • [43] MEASURING CAR DRIVERS' WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR IMPROVED INTERCITY TRANSPORTATION SERVICE: A CASE STUDY IN LIBYA
    Miskeen, Manssour A. Abdulasalm
    Borhan, Muhamad Nazri
    Alhodairi, Ahmed Mohamed
    Ismail, Amiruddin
    Rahmat, Riza Atiq
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 11 (08): : 1073 - 1085
  • [44] Willingness to pay to ensure a continuous water supply with minimum restrictions
    Wilson, Clevo
    Athukorala, Wasantha
    Torgler, Benno
    Gifford, Robert
    Garcia-Valinas, Maria A.
    Managi, Shunsuke
    EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 61 (03) : 1519 - 1537
  • [45] Water supply security and willingness to pay to avoid drought restrictions
    Hensher, D
    Shore, N
    Train, K
    ECONOMIC RECORD, 2006, 82 (256) : 56 - 66
  • [46] Willingness to pay to ensure a continuous water supply with minimum restrictions
    Clevo Wilson
    Wasantha Athukorala
    Benno Torgler
    Robert Gifford
    Maria A. Garcia-Valiñas
    Shunsuke Managi
    Empirical Economics, 2021, 61 : 1519 - 1537
  • [47] Households' willingness to pay for quality of drinking water in Jaffna area of Sri Lanka
    Krishnapillai, Sooriyakumar
    Perinpanathan, Sumangkalai
    Sivakumar, Sivashankar
    JOURNAL OF WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-AQUA, 2020, 69 (06): : 629 - 638
  • [48] Households' Willingness to Pay for Improved Solid Waste Collection Services in Kampala City, Uganda
    Banga, Margaret
    Lokina, Razack B.
    Mkenda, Adolf F.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT & DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 20 (04): : 428 - 448
  • [49] Willingness to Pay for Ancillary Water Service Improvements in Puerto Rico
    Tavarez, Hector
    Elbakidze, Levan
    WATER ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2024, 10 (01)
  • [50] Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept Compensation for Changes in Urban Water Customer Service Standards
    Darla Hatton MacDonald
    Mark D. Morrison
    Mary B. Barnes
    Water Resources Management, 2010, 24 : 3145 - 3158