Travel time reliability value and thresholds in North Carolina

被引:0
|
作者
Pulugurtha S.S. [1 ]
Penmetsa P. [1 ]
Duddu V.R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd, Charlotte, 28223, NC
来源
Pulugurtha, S.S. (sspulugurtha@uncc.edu) | 2021年 / Aracne Editrice卷 / 53期
关键词
Buffer time; Monetary value; Reliability; Threshold; Transportation; Travel time;
D O I
10.4399/97912804143427
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The focus of this paper is to identify thresholds and monetize travel time reliability to evaluate transportation projects/alternatives. Stated preference survey was designed to capture perceptions of North Carolina motorists. A random survey was carried out across the cities and towns in North Carolina, and 334 valid responses were gathered from the participants. The results indicate that 60.8% of the random survey participants were willing to take an unreliable route with travel time varying from 20 to 30 minutes, whereas the remaining 39.2% of the random survey participants prefer a reliable 25-minute route. As the variation in travel time increased on the unreliable route, random survey participants preferred to opt for a reliable route over an unreliable route. Four days of unreliability per month was acceptable for only 33.8% of the random survey participants. They shifted from an unreliable route to a reliable route with an increase in the number of unreliable days in a month. Overall, the generalized value of buffer time from the random survey is estimated equal to $0.45 per minute. Differences in the value of buffer time were observed between cities, towns, and other areas across North Carolina. While a higher percentage of focus group survey participants preferred the reliable route, the value of buffer time based on data collected through focus group survey is also comparable to the random survey-based value. © 2021, Aracne Editrice. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 116
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multistate Model for Travel Time Reliability
    Guo, Feng
    Rakha, Hesham
    Park, Sangjun
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2010, (2188) : 46 - 54
  • [32] A METHODOLOGY FOR TRAVEL TIME RELIABILITY BENEFIT MEASUREMENT CONSIDERING TRAVEL TIME VARIABILITY
    Kim, Jooyoung
    Lee, Seungjae
    You, Sangyong
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION AND URBAN SUSTAINABILITY, 2010, : 369 - 376
  • [33] Theoretical threshold of travel time for travel time reliability from probabilistic measures
    Zang, Xiaodong
    [J]. TRANSPORTMETRICA B-TRANSPORT DYNAMICS, 2022, 10 (01) : 68 - 83
  • [34] Travel Time Distribution Under Interrupted Flow and Application to Travel Time Reliability
    Yang, Fan
    Yun, Mei-Ping
    Yang, Xiao-Guang
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2014, (2466) : 114 - 124
  • [35] Multimodal travel choice determinants in context of travel time reliability
    Minal
    RaviSekhar, Chalumuri
    Madhu, Errampalli
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-TRANSPORT, 2021, 176 (07) : 430 - 439
  • [36] Travel time reliability during incident duration time
    [J]. Liu, H. (hxliu@swjtu.cn), 1600, Science Press (48):
  • [37] Advances in the Reliability and Validity of the North Carolina Family Assessment Scale
    Kirk, Raymond
    Kim, Mimi
    Griffith, Diane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN BEHAVIOR IN THE SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 11 (3-4) : 157 - 176
  • [38] Time before history: The archaeology of North Carolina
    Boyd, C
    [J]. NORTH AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGIST, 2002, 23 (01) : 78 - 80
  • [39] The value of travel time and reliability-evidence from a stated preference survey and actual usage
    Devarasetty, Prem Chand
    Burris, Mark
    Shaw, W. Douglass
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2012, 46 (08) : 1227 - 1240
  • [40] Road Network Capacity Reliability Considering Travel Time Reliability
    Kuang, Aiwu
    Tang, Zhiqiang
    Shan, Liangci
    [J]. INTELLIGENT AND INTEGRATED SUSTAINABLE MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS PROCEEDINGS FROM THE 13TH COTA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF TRANSPORTATION PROFESSIONALS (CICTP2013), 2013, 96 : 1818 - 1827