Travel time reliability value and thresholds in North Carolina

被引:0
|
作者
Pulugurtha S.S. [1 ]
Penmetsa P. [1 ]
Duddu V.R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd, Charlotte, 28223, NC
来源
Pulugurtha, S.S. (sspulugurtha@uncc.edu) | 2021年 / Aracne Editrice卷 / 53期
关键词
Buffer time; Monetary value; Reliability; Threshold; Transportation; Travel time;
D O I
10.4399/97912804143427
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The focus of this paper is to identify thresholds and monetize travel time reliability to evaluate transportation projects/alternatives. Stated preference survey was designed to capture perceptions of North Carolina motorists. A random survey was carried out across the cities and towns in North Carolina, and 334 valid responses were gathered from the participants. The results indicate that 60.8% of the random survey participants were willing to take an unreliable route with travel time varying from 20 to 30 minutes, whereas the remaining 39.2% of the random survey participants prefer a reliable 25-minute route. As the variation in travel time increased on the unreliable route, random survey participants preferred to opt for a reliable route over an unreliable route. Four days of unreliability per month was acceptable for only 33.8% of the random survey participants. They shifted from an unreliable route to a reliable route with an increase in the number of unreliable days in a month. Overall, the generalized value of buffer time from the random survey is estimated equal to $0.45 per minute. Differences in the value of buffer time were observed between cities, towns, and other areas across North Carolina. While a higher percentage of focus group survey participants preferred the reliable route, the value of buffer time based on data collected through focus group survey is also comparable to the random survey-based value. © 2021, Aracne Editrice. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 116
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Estimation of value of travel time reliability
    Nam, Doohee
    Park, Dongjoo
    Khamkongkhun, Apichat
    [J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 1600, 39 (01): : 39 - 61
  • [2] Estimation of value of travel time reliability
    Nam, D
    Park, D
    Khamkongkhun, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 2005, 39 (01) : 39 - 61
  • [3] Estimating the value of travel time and of travel time reliability in road networks
    Uchida, Kenetsu
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2014, 66 : 129 - 147
  • [4] Freeway Link-Level Travel Time and Reliability Thresholds
    Pulugurtha, Srinivas S.
    Kodupuganti, Swapneel R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT 2020 - PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2020, : 119 - 132
  • [5] Value of Travel Time Savings and Value of Trip Time Reliability: a concern
    Hensher, David A.
    [J]. ROAD & TRANSPORT RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (04): : 73 - 74
  • [6] Value of travel time savings and value of trip time reliability: A concern
    Hensher, David A.
    [J]. Road and Transport Research, 2015, 24 (04): : 73 - 74
  • [7] Estimation of the value of travel time and of travel time reliability for heterogeneous drivers in a road network
    Teppei Kato
    Kenetsu Uchida
    William H. K. Lam
    Agachai Sumalee
    [J]. Transportation, 2021, 48 : 1639 - 1670
  • [8] Estimation of the value of travel time and of travel time reliability for heterogeneous drivers in a road network
    Kato, Teppei
    Uchida, Kenetsu
    Lam, William H. K.
    Sumalee, Agachai
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION, 2021, 48 (04) : 1639 - 1670
  • [9] Effect of toll roads on travel time reliability within its vicinity: a case study from the state of North Carolina
    Mathew, Sonu
    Pulugurtha, Srinivas S.
    Mane, Ajinkya S.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION LETTERS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH, 2020, 12 (09): : 604 - 612
  • [10] Value of travel time reliability: A review of current evidence
    Carrion, Carlos
    Levinson, David
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2012, 46 (04) : 720 - 741