Hover attitude control of a tail-sitter UAV based on robust servomechanism controller

被引：0
|
作者：
Zhong J.-Y. [1 ]
Song B.-F. [1 ]
机构：
[1] School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an
来源：
Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision | 2020年 / 35卷 / 02期
关键词：
Attitude control; Extended state observer; Hover; L1 adaptive control; Robust servomechanism; Tail sitter; Time delay margin;
D O I：
10.13195/j.kzyjc.2018.0926
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
This study investigates the design of a hover attitude controller of a flying-wing tail-sitter unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) by taking into account the uncertain impacts such as actuator failure, wind field disturbance, aerodynamic uncertainty and the uncertainty of moment of inertia. Based on the linearized kinematic and dynamic model near the hovering point, a robust servomechanism linear quadratic regulator (RSLQR) controller is designed to ensure the good response and robustness of the nominal system. Meanwhile, considering the performance degradation of the controller in exist of large uncertainties and disturbances, the L1 adaptive controller is designed to compensate for the uncertainties and disturbances so that the aircraft could operate near a large range of the equilibrium point. Considering that the time delay margin of controller is crucial to the stability of system, the relationships between the time delay margin and the controller parameter are discussed. Simulation results show the good performance in exist of different uncertainties and a method of compensation based on the extended state observer (ESO) is proposed to ensure good response when the control system is applied to a performance-limited hardware. Finally, a flight test is implemented to verify the validity and feasibility of the algorithm. © 2020, Editorial Office of Control and Decision. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：339 / 348
页数：9
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [11] Kharisov E., Hovakimyan N., Astrom K., Comparison of several adaptive controllers according to their robustness metrics, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, (2010)
  • [12] Cao C., Hovakimyan N., Design and Analysis of a Novel L1 adaptive control architecture with guaranteed transient performance, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 53, 2, pp. 586-591, (2008)
  • [13] Vanness J., Kharisov E., Hovakimyan N., L1 adaptive control with proportional adaptation law, American Control Conference, pp. 1919-1924, (2012)
  • [14] Ma L., Duan C., Zhang G., Air-to-air missile bank-to-turn autopilot based on L1 adaptive control, The 29th Chinese Control and Decision Conference, pp. 5131-5136, (2017)
  • [15] Xu C., Lin Q., Dong P., Et al., Design of the UAV normal acceleration RSLQR-L1 controller, The 29th Chinese Control and Decision Conference, pp. 5119-5123, (2017)
  • [16] Lavretsky E., Kevin-Wise A., Robust and Adaptive Control with Aerospace Applications, pp. 36-42, (2015)
  • [17] Zhong J., Song B., Yang W., Et al., Modeling and hover control of a dual-rotor tail-sitter unmanned aircraft, Intelligent Robotics and Applications, pp. 589-601, (2017)
  • [18] Von Karman wind turbulence model (continuous)
  • [19] Han J.Q., Active Disturbance Rejection Control Technique-The Technique for Estimating and Compensating the Uncertainties, pp. 208-210, (2016)
12