Calibration of simulation physical parameters of clay loam based on soil accumulation test

被引：0
|
作者：
Xiang W. [1 ,2 ]
Wu M. [1 ]
Lü J. [2 ]
Quan W. [1 ]
Ma L. [2 ]
Liu J. [2 ]
机构：
[1] College of Engineering, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha
[2] Institute of Bast Fiber Crops, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha
来源：
Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering | 2019年 / 35卷 / 12期
关键词：
Clay loam; Discrete element method; Johoson-Kendall-Roberts contact model; Models; Parameter calibration; Repose angle; Simulation parameters;
D O I：
10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.12.014
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In order to obtain the precise physical parameters of the discrete element simulation model of typical cultivated soil clay loam in southern China, this paper constructed a soil discrete element simulation model. Based on a soil accumulation test, this study proposed a method for combining the significance analysis and response surface method, which calibrated and optimized the simulation parameters of clay loam in southern China. Combining the results of actual test and GEMM database parameters recommended by constructing the DEM model of the soil, repose angle of soil was taken as response value, using the Design Expert software through the Plackett-Burman test, the steepest climbing test and Box-Behnken test, simulation physical parameters were calibrated and optimized. The simulation model of discrete element in clay loam was verified to be accurate by analyzing the simulation and soil bin testing of hole forming device. The DEM model of soil was established on the basis of the parameters determined by the basic test. The 8 initial physical parameters were screened for significance using the Plackett-Burman test. The results show that: the surface energy of soil for JKR model, soil-soil restitution coefficient, and the soil-soil static friction coefficient have significant effects on the response value and repose angle. Based on the optimal interval value of the significant parameters are determined by the steepest ascent test and the Box-Behnken test result, the quadratic regression model of significance parameters and repose angle is established and optimized to obtain the optimal combination of the significance parameters: The surface energy of soil for JKR model is 12.73 J/m2. The soil-soil restitution coefficient is 0.55. The soil-soil static friction coefficient is 0.84. Other insignificance parameters are as recommended by the GEMM database (Poisson's ratio of soil is 0.38. Soil-soil rolling friction coefficient is 0.1. Soil-steel restitution coefficient is 0.3. Soil-steel static friction coefficient is 0.6. Soil-steel rolling friction coefficient is 0.1). By the analog simulation of optimal parameter combination, it can be obtained that the simulated repose angle is 42.9° and the measured repose angle is 42.4°, therefore, the relative error is only 1.2%. There is no significant difference in shape and relevant value between the soil in simulation and the soil in experiment (P>0.05). The optimized parameters can be used for further DEM analog simulation between the clay loam and the soil-contacting components and revealing the law of motion of clay loam under the action of soil-contacting components. The results of the simulation and soil bin testing of hole forming device show that, motion law of the soil-engaging component in the simulated soil model is slightly different from that in the soil groove test, with the numerical difference within 3.98%, which proves that the soil simulation model after parameter calibration and optimization can accurately replace the real soil for simulation. The research can provide theoretical basis and technical support for the dynamic study of the interaction between this type of soil and the contact soil components. © 2019, Editorial Department of the Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：116 / 123
页数：7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [11] Shi L., Sun W., Zhao W., Et al., Parameter determination and validation of discrete element model of seed potato mechanical seeding, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 34, 6, pp. 35-42, (2018)
  • [12] Mak J., Chen Y., Sadek M.A., Determining parameters of a discrete element model for soil-tool interaction, Soil and Tillage Research, 118, pp. 117-122, (2012)
  • [13] Li B., Chen Y., Chen J., Modeling of soil-claw interaction using the discrete element method (DEM), Soil and Tillage Research, 158, pp. 177-185, (2016)
  • [14] Chen Y., Munkholm L.J., Nyord T., A discrete element model for soil-sweep interaction in three different soils, Soil and Tillage Research, 126, pp. 34-41, (2013)
  • [15] Xiao X., Tan Y., Zhang H., Et al., Experimental and DEM studies on the particle mixing performance in rotating drums: Effect of area ratio, Powder Technology, 314, pp. 182-194, (2017)
  • [16] Coetzee C.J., Els D.N.J., Calibration of discrete element parameters and the modelling of silo discharge and bucket filling, Computers & Electronics in Agriculture, 65, 2, pp. 198-212, (2009)
  • [17] Grima A.P., Wypych P.W., Development and validation of calibration methods for discrete element modelling, Granular Matter, 13, 2, pp. 127-132, (2011)
  • [18] Liu F., Zhang J., Li B., Et al., Calibration of parameters of wheat required in discrete element method simulation based on repose angle of particle heap, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 32, 12, pp. 247-253, (2016)
  • [19] Liu F., Zhang J., Chen J., Construction of visco-elasto-plasticity contact model of vibratory screening and its parameters calibration for wheat, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 34, 15, pp. 37-43, (2018)
  • [20] Uchul M., Fielke J.M., Saunders C., 3D DEM tillage simulation: Validation of a hysteretic spring (plastic) contact model for a sweep tool operating in a cohesionless soil, Soil and Tillage Research, 144, pp. 220-227, (2014)
1234