Calibration of simulation physical parameters of clay loam based on soil accumulation test

被引：0
|
作者：
Xiang W. [1 ,2 ]
Wu M. [1 ]
Lü J. [2 ]
Quan W. [1 ]
Ma L. [2 ]
Liu J. [2 ]
机构：
[1] College of Engineering, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha
[2] Institute of Bast Fiber Crops, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha
来源：
Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering | 2019年 / 35卷 / 12期
关键词：
Clay loam; Discrete element method; Johoson-Kendall-Roberts contact model; Models; Parameter calibration; Repose angle; Simulation parameters;
D O I：
10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.12.014
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In order to obtain the precise physical parameters of the discrete element simulation model of typical cultivated soil clay loam in southern China, this paper constructed a soil discrete element simulation model. Based on a soil accumulation test, this study proposed a method for combining the significance analysis and response surface method, which calibrated and optimized the simulation parameters of clay loam in southern China. Combining the results of actual test and GEMM database parameters recommended by constructing the DEM model of the soil, repose angle of soil was taken as response value, using the Design Expert software through the Plackett-Burman test, the steepest climbing test and Box-Behnken test, simulation physical parameters were calibrated and optimized. The simulation model of discrete element in clay loam was verified to be accurate by analyzing the simulation and soil bin testing of hole forming device. The DEM model of soil was established on the basis of the parameters determined by the basic test. The 8 initial physical parameters were screened for significance using the Plackett-Burman test. The results show that: the surface energy of soil for JKR model, soil-soil restitution coefficient, and the soil-soil static friction coefficient have significant effects on the response value and repose angle. Based on the optimal interval value of the significant parameters are determined by the steepest ascent test and the Box-Behnken test result, the quadratic regression model of significance parameters and repose angle is established and optimized to obtain the optimal combination of the significance parameters: The surface energy of soil for JKR model is 12.73 J/m2. The soil-soil restitution coefficient is 0.55. The soil-soil static friction coefficient is 0.84. Other insignificance parameters are as recommended by the GEMM database (Poisson's ratio of soil is 0.38. Soil-soil rolling friction coefficient is 0.1. Soil-steel restitution coefficient is 0.3. Soil-steel static friction coefficient is 0.6. Soil-steel rolling friction coefficient is 0.1). By the analog simulation of optimal parameter combination, it can be obtained that the simulated repose angle is 42.9° and the measured repose angle is 42.4°, therefore, the relative error is only 1.2%. There is no significant difference in shape and relevant value between the soil in simulation and the soil in experiment (P>0.05). The optimized parameters can be used for further DEM analog simulation between the clay loam and the soil-contacting components and revealing the law of motion of clay loam under the action of soil-contacting components. The results of the simulation and soil bin testing of hole forming device show that, motion law of the soil-engaging component in the simulated soil model is slightly different from that in the soil groove test, with the numerical difference within 3.98%, which proves that the soil simulation model after parameter calibration and optimization can accurately replace the real soil for simulation. The research can provide theoretical basis and technical support for the dynamic study of the interaction between this type of soil and the contact soil components. © 2019, Editorial Department of the Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：116 / 123
页数：7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Li B., Chen J., Huang Y., Research progress of discrete element simulation of soil-machine interaction, Journal of Agrucultural Mechanization Research, 37, 1, pp. 217-222, (2015)
  • [2] Wamg X., Yue B., Gao X., Et al., Discrete element simulations and experiments of disturbance behavior as affected by mounting height of subsoiler's wing, Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 49, 10, pp. 124-136, (2018)
  • [3] Ma S., Xu L., Xing J., Et al., Development of unilateral cleaning machine for grapevine buried by soil with rotary impeller, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 34, 23, pp. 1-10, (2018)
  • [4] Jia H., Liu H., Yu H., Et al., Simulation and experiment on stubble clearance mechanism with concave claw-type for no-tillage planter, Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 49, 11, pp. 68-77, (2018)
  • [5] Zdancevicius E., Kacianauskas R., Zabulionis D., Improvement of viscoelastic damping for the hertz contact of particles due to impact velocity, Procedia Engineering, 172, pp. 1286-1290, (2017)
  • [6] Buechler S.R., Mustoe G.G.W., Berger J.R., Et al., Under-standing the soil contact problem for the LWD and static drum roller by using the DEM, Journal of Engineering Mechanics-Asce, 138, 1, pp. 124-132, (2012)
  • [7] Fang H., Ji C., Farman A.C., Et al., Analysis of soil dynamic behavior during rotary tillage based on distinct element method, Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 47, 3, pp. 22-28, (2016)
  • [8] Janda A., Ooi J.Y., DEM modeling of cone penetration and unconfined compression in cohesive solids, Powder Technology, 293, pp. 60-68, (2016)
  • [9] Huang Y., Hang C., Yuan M., Et al., Discrete element simulation and experiment on disturbance behavior of subsoiling, Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 47, 7, pp. 80-88, (2016)
  • [10] Yuan Q., Xu L., Xing J., Et al., Parameter calibration of discrete element model of organic fertilizer particles for mechanical fertilization, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 34, 18, pp. 21-27, (2018)
1234