Multi-objective Feature Attribution Explanation for Explainable Machine Learning

被引:1
|
作者
Wang Z. [1 ]
Huang C. [1 ]
Li Y. [2 ]
Yao X. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Research Institute of Trustworthy Autonomous Systems, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain-inspired Intelligent Computation, Departmentof Computer Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen
[2] The Advanced Cognitive Technology Lab, Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd, Shanghai
[3] School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Explainable machine learning; feature attribution explanations; multi-objective evolutionary algorithms; multi-objective learning;
D O I
10.1145/3617380
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The feature attribution-based explanation (FAE) methods, which indicate how much each input feature contributes to the model's output for a given data point, are one of the most popular categories of explainable machine learning techniques. Although various metrics have been proposed to evaluate the explanation quality, no single metric could capture different aspects of the explanations. Different conclusions might be drawn using different metrics. Moreover, during the processes of generating explanations, existing FAE methods either do not consider any evaluation metric or only consider the faithfulness of the explanation, failing to consider multiple metrics simultaneously. To address this issue, we formulate the problem of creating FAE explainable models as a multi-objective learning problem that considers multiple explanation quality metrics simultaneously. We first reveal conflicts between various explanation quality metrics, including faithfulness, sensitivity, and complexity. Then, we define the considered multi-objective explanation problem and propose a multi-objective feature attribution explanation (MOFAE) framework to address this newly defined problem. Subsequently, we instantiate the framework by simultaneously considering the explanation's faithfulness, sensitivity, and complexity. Experimental results comparing with six state-of-The-Art FAE methods on eight datasets demonstrate that our method can optimize multiple conflicting metrics simultaneously and can provide explanations with higher faithfulness, lower sensitivity, and lower complexity than the compared methods. Moreover, the results have shown that our method has better diversity, i.e., it provides various explanations that achieve different tradeoffs between multiple conflicting explanation quality metrics. Therefore, it can provide tailored explanations to different stakeholders based on their specific requirements. © 2024 Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Feature Learning with Multi-objective Evolutionary Computation in the generation of Acoustic Features
    Menezes, Alves
    Cabral, Giordano
    Gomes, Bruno
    Pereira, Paulo
    INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL-IBEROAMERICAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 22 (64): : 14 - 35
  • [42] Multi-objective feature selection with NSGA
    Hamdani, Tarek M.
    Won, Jin-Myung
    Alimi, Adel M.
    Karray, Fakhri
    ADAPTIVE AND NATURAL COMPUTING ALGORITHMS, PT 1, 2007, 4431 : 240 - +
  • [43] Multi-Disciplinary and Multi-Objective Optimization Method Based on Machine Learning
    Dai, Jiahua
    Liu, Peiqing
    Li, Ling
    Qu, Qiulin
    Niu, Tongzhi
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2024, 62 (02) : 691 - 707
  • [44] Fairer Machine Learning Through the Hybrid of Multi-objective Evolutionary Learning and Adversarial Learning
    Gui, Shenhao
    Zhang, Qingquan
    Huang, Changwu
    Yuan, Bo
    2023 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS, IJCNN, 2023,
  • [45] Machine Learning Enhanced Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition
    Liau, Yung Siang
    Tan, Kay Chen
    Hu, Jun
    Qiu, Xin
    Gee, Sen Bong
    INTELLIGENT DATA ENGINEERING AND AUTOMATED LEARNING - IDEAL 2013, 2013, 8206 : 553 - 560
  • [46] Achieving Universal Fairness in Machine Learning: A Multi-objective Optimization Perspective
    Hu, Zirui
    Zhang, Zheng
    Feng, Wenjun
    Liu, Qi
    KNOWLEDGE SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, PT II, KSEM 2024, 2024, 14885 : 164 - 179
  • [47] Multi-objective optimization of concrete mix design based on machine learning
    Zheng, Wu
    Shui, Zhonghe
    Xu, Zhengzhong
    Gao, Xu
    Zhang, Shaolin
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2023, 76
  • [48] Multi-Objective Evolutionary Optimization Algorithms for Machine Learning: A Recent Survey
    Alexandropoulos, Stamatios-Aggelos N.
    Aridas, Christos K.
    Kotsiantis, Sotiris B.
    Vrahatis, Michael N.
    APPROXIMATION AND OPTIMIZATION: ALGORITHMS, COMPLEXITY AND APPLICATIONS, 2019, 145 : 35 - 55
  • [49] Machine learning with incomplete datasets using multi-objective optimization models
    Khorshidi, Hadi A.
    Kirley, Michael
    Aickelin, Uwe
    2020 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS (IJCNN), 2020,
  • [50] Model selection of extreme learning machine based on multi-objective optimization
    Wentao Mao
    Mei Tian
    Xizheng Cao
    Jiucheng Xu
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2013, 22 : 521 - 529