Similarities and differences in spatial and nonspatial cognitive maps

被引:0
|
作者
Wu C.M. [1 ,2 ]
Schulz E. [3 ]
Garvert M.M. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Meder B. [2 ,7 ,8 ]
Schuck N.W. [5 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
[2] Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin
[3] Max Planck Research Group Computational Principles of Intelligence, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen
[4] Department of Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig
[5] Max Planck Research Group NeuroCode, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin
[6] Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford
[7] Max Planck Research Group iSearch, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin
[8] Department of Psychology, University of Erfurt, Erfurt
[9] Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, Berlin
来源
PLoS Computational Biology | 2020年 / 16卷 / 09期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
D O I
10.1371/JOURNAL.PCBI.1008149
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Learning and generalization in spatial domains is often thought to rely on a “cognitive map”, representing relationships between spatial locations. Recent research suggests that this same neural machinery is also recruited for reasoning about more abstract, conceptual forms of knowledge. Yet, to what extent do spatial and conceptual reasoning share common computational principles, and what are the implications for behavior? Using a within-subject design we studied how participants used spatial or conceptual distances to generalize and search for correlated rewards in successive multi-armed bandit tasks. Participant behavior indicated sensitivity to both spatial and conceptual distance, and was best captured using a Bayesian model of generalization that formalized distance-dependent generalization and uncertainty-guided exploration as a Gaussian Process regression with a radial basis function kernel. The same Gaussian Process model best captured human search decisions and judgments in both domains, and could simulate realistic learning curves, where we found equivalent levels of generalization in spatial and conceptual tasks. At the same time, we also find characteristic differences between domains. Relative to the spatial domain, participants showed reduced levels of uncertainty-directed exploration and increased levels of random exploration in the conceptual domain. Participants also displayed a one-directional transfer effect, where experience in the spatial task boosted performance in the conceptual task, but not vice versa. While confidence judgments indicated that participants were sensitive to the uncertainty of their knowledge in both tasks, they did not or could not leverage their estimates of uncertainty to guide exploration in the conceptual task. These results support the notion that value-guided learning and generalization recruit cognitive-map dependent computational mechanisms in spatial and conceptual domains. Yet both behavioral and model-based analyses suggest domain specific differences in how these representations map onto actions. Copyright: © 2020 Wu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Linking the spatial syntax of cognitive maps to the spatial syntax of the environment
    Kim, YO
    Penn, A
    ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2004, 36 (04) : 483 - 504
  • [22] Age differences in the formation and use of cognitive maps
    Iaria, Giuseppe
    Palermo, Liana
    Committeri, Giorgia
    Barton, Jason J. S.
    BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2009, 196 (02) : 187 - 191
  • [23] EFFECT OF SPATIAL STIMULI ON ESTIMATION OF COGNITIVE MAPS
    MACKAY, DB
    GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS, 1976, 8 (04) : 439 - 452
  • [24] Spatial navigation using hierarchical cognitive maps
    Voicu, H
    Schmajuk, N
    ICCM - 2001: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2001 FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE MODELING, 2001, : 269 - 270
  • [25] Externalizing virtually perceived spatial cognitive maps
    Patel, Kanubhai K.
    Vij, Sanjay K.
    2008 2ND ANNUAL IEEE SYSTEMS CONFERENCE, 2008, : 237 - +
  • [26] Topological Schemas of Cognitive Maps and Spatial Learning
    Babichev, Andrey
    Cheng, Sen
    Dabaghian, Yuri A.
    FRONTIERS IN COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10
  • [27] SPATIAL COGNITION - SYSTEMATIC DISTORTIONS IN COGNITIVE MAPS
    OKABAYASHI, H
    GLYNN, SM
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 111 (02): : 271 - 279
  • [28] SENSE OF DIRECTION, SPATIAL ORIENTATION, AND COGNITIVE MAPS
    KOZLOWSKI, LT
    BRYANT, KJ
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1977, 3 (04) : 590 - 598
  • [29] Spatial Simon effects with nonspatial responses
    Jan De Houwer
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2004, 11 : 49 - 53
  • [30] SPATIAL AND NONSPATIAL CONSISTENCY IN DESIGN SYSTEMS
    BORKIN, H
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 1986, 13 (02): : 207 - 222