Lab to Multiscene Generalization for Non-Line-of-Sight Identification With Small-Scale Datasets

被引:0
|
作者
Hua Q. [1 ]
Nielsen M.H. [1 ]
An Z. [2 ]
Ren J. [3 ]
Wisniewski R. [1 ]
Kold S. [4 ]
Rahbek O. [4 ]
Shen M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Electronic Systems, Aalborg University, Aalborg
[2] School of Communication and Information Engineering, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing
[3] National Key Laboratory of Antennas and Microwave Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an
[4] Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg
来源
IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence | 2024年 / 5卷 / 02期
关键词
Channel impulse response (CIR); deep neural network (DNN); indoor localization; machine learning (ML); non-line-of-sight (NLOS) identification; ultra-wideband (UWB);
D O I
10.1109/TAI.2023.3262763
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Ultra-wideband (UWB) wireless indoor positioning systems rely on time-of-flight to estimate distances but can be biased and miscalculated due to non-line-of-sight (NLOS) transmission channels in complex environments. Therefore, to remove errors, several machine learning (ML) techniques have been proposed for identifying NLOS signals from channel impulse responses (CIRs). However, as CIR signals could be heavily influenced by various environments, current NLOS classifiers are not universal to provide satisfactory accuracy for new scenarios and require detailed measurements on a large number of CIRs for training. Hence, we propose a generalization method based on the data augmentation via noise injection and transfer learning to allow the deep neural network (DNN) trained under a lab condition to be applied to various and even harsh practical scenarios with the need to measure massive training data minimized. This article presents the first demonstration that it is effective to utilize a lab-based pretrained DNN for real-world transfer and white Gaussian noise data augmentation for ML-based NLOS identification on UWB CIRs to address the problem when it is not feasible to measure sufficient training data. Our testing results show that, in two scenarios, corridor and parking lot, with only 50 CIR signals as the training set, the accuracy of the NLOS identification model after applying the proposed method is increased from 84.4% to 98.8% and from 81.1% to 97.1%, respectively. © 2023 IEEE.
引用
收藏
页码:516 / 529
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Non-line-of-sight Positioning for mmWave Communications
    Fellhauer, Felix
    Lassen, Jonas
    Jaber, Ahmed
    Loghin, Nabil
    ten Brink, Stephan
    2018 IEEE 19TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SIGNAL PROCESSING ADVANCES IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS (SPAWC), 2018, : 740 - 744
  • [32] Non-line-of-sight multiscatter propagation model
    Yin, Hongwei
    Chang, Shengli
    Jia, Honghui
    Yang, Jiankun
    Yang, Juncai
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2009, 26 (11) : 2466 - 2469
  • [33] Identification and Mitigation of Non-line-of-sight conditions Using Received Signal Strength
    Xiao, Zhuoling
    Wen, Hongkai
    Markham, Andrew
    Trigoni, Niki
    Blunsom, Phil
    Frolik, Jeff
    2013 IEEE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS AND MOBILE COMPUTING, NETWORKING AND COMMUNICATIONS (WIMOB), 2013, : 667 - 674
  • [34] Identification of Location Spoofing in Wireless Sensor Networks in Non-Line-of-Sight Conditions
    Liu, Dawei
    Xu, Yuedong
    Huang, Xin
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS, 2018, 14 (06) : 2375 - 2384
  • [35] Efficient Non-Line-of-Sight Identification in Localization Using a Bank of Neural Networks
    Abolfathimomtaz, Abbas
    Mohammadkarimi, Mostafa
    Ardakani, Masoud
    2021 IEEE 32ND ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PERSONAL, INDOOR AND MOBILE RADIO COMMUNICATIONS (PIMRC), 2021,
  • [36] On achievable bound for non-line-of-sight geolocation
    Qi, YH
    Kobayashi, H
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IASTED INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS AND OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2002, : 475 - 479
  • [37] Line-of-sight and non-line-of-sight links for dispersive terahertz wireless networks
    Ghasempour, Yasaman
    Amarasinghe, Yasith
    Yeh, Chia-Yi
    Knightly, Edward
    Mittleman, Daniel M.
    APL PHOTONICS, 2021, 6 (04)
  • [38] Stereo Perception Optimization of Line-of-Sight and Non-Line-of-Sight Sensor Networks
    Wang Qinglong
    Qin Ningning
    LASER & OPTOELECTRONICS PROGRESS, 2023, 60 (06)
  • [39] Pathloss-based non-Line-of-Sight Identification in an Indoor Environment: An Experimental Study
    Asim, M.
    Iqbal, M. Ozair
    Aman, Waqas
    Rahman, M. Mahboob Ur
    Abbasi, Qammer H.
    2024 18TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, EUCAP, 2024,
  • [40] Error Backprojection Algorithms for Non-Line-of-Sight Imaging
    La Manna, Marco
    Kine, Fiona
    Breitbach, Eric
    Jackson, Jonathan
    Sultan, Talha
    Velten, Andreas
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 41 (07) : 1615 - 1626