Methodology for assessing the vulnerability of built cultural heritage

被引:0
|
作者
Damas Mollá, Laura [1 ]
Sagarna, Maialen [2 ]
Zabaleta, Ane [1 ]
Aranburu, Arantza [1 ]
Antiguedad, Iñaki [1 ]
Uriarte, Jesus A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Geology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of the Basque Country, Barrio Sarriena, s/n 48970, Leioa, Spain
[2] Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Plaza Europa 1, Donostia,E-20018, Spain
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU528 [混凝土及混凝土制品]; TV43 [水工混凝土和砂浆];
学科分类号
摘要
The conservation of constructions, and especially of built heritage, requires complex studies concerning their Global Vulnerability. These studies have to consider the current state of the building, i.e. the degradation degree, and the factors that mostly affect the building and, therefore, generate alterations. These factors are not limited to the structure of the building, location and environmental factors are also involved. Hence, the assessment of built heritage vulnerability should consider the building itself and also be extended to the site and the environment. This work presents a systematic and reproducible methodology for the quantification of the Global Vulnerability in different typologies of constructions and environments. The proposed methodology establishes a relationship between the existing alterations (A) and the main factors (F) that affect vulnerability (V) by means of an AFV (Alteration/Factor/Vulnerability) diagram. Based on these results alteration and vulnerability indices are calculated. The obtained AFV diagram allows the comparison between different constructions or separate areas within the same construction. This methodology was validated in two early twentieth-century constructions that form part of the reinforced concrete architectural heritage of the Basque Country: the Punta Begoña Galleries (Getxo, Spain) and the Aqueduct of the Araxes paper mill (Tolosa, Spain). © 2022 The Authors
引用
下载
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The digitization of shared cultural built heritage highlighted in "Heritage at Risk in Algeria".
    Mechiche, Rania
    Zeghlache, Hamza
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE FLORENCE HERI-TECH: THE FUTURE OF HERITAGE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 949
  • [22] Built heritage vulnerability: synergies between the Universities of Naples and Tokyo
    Fujita, Kaori
    Viola, Serena
    TECHNE-JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY FOR ARCHITECTURE AND ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 7 : 81 - 86
  • [23] Understanding the decay of stone-built cultural heritage
    Smith, B. J.
    Gomez-Heras, M.
    McCabe, S.
    PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY-EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 32 (04): : 439 - 461
  • [24] Who owns cultural goods? The case of built heritage
    Benhamou, F
    ECONOMICS OF ART AND CULTURE, 2004, 260 : 187 - 202
  • [25] Valuing Built Cultural Heritage in a Malaysian Urban Context
    Bakri, Aidatul Fadzlin
    Ibrahim, Norhati
    Ahmad, Sabarinah Sh
    Zaman, Nurulhusna Qamaruz
    ASIAN CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT-BEHAVIOUR STUDIES (ACE-BS 2014 SEOUL), 2015, 170 : 381 - 389
  • [26] Mitigating Climate Change in the Cultural Built Heritage Sector
    Sesana, Elena
    Bertolin, Chiara
    Gagnon, Alexandre S.
    Hughes, John J.
    CLIMATE, 2019, 7 (07)
  • [27] Cultural Heritage Preservation instead of Cult of Fakes. Against the Reconstruction of Built Cultural Heritage - an Anthology
    Weis, Markus
    DENKMALPFLEGE, 2011, 69 (01): : 88 - 94
  • [28] A methodology for building domain ontology of cultural heritage
    Wei, Tong
    Chen, Yuqi
    DIGITAL SCHOLARSHIP IN THE HUMANITIES, 2023, 38 (04) : 1710 - 1719
  • [29] Cultural heritage management - towards a new methodology
    Gawel, Lukasz
    PROBLEMY ZARZADZANIA-MANAGEMENT ISSUES, 2013, 11 (04): : 87 - 100
  • [30] Climate Change and Cultural Heritage: A Landscape Vulnerability Framework
    Cook, Isabel
    Johnston, Robert
    Selby, Katherine
    JOURNAL OF ISLAND & COASTAL ARCHAEOLOGY, 2021, 16 (2-4): : 553 - 571