Suggested use? On evidence-based decision-making in industrial ecology and beyond

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Junming [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
关键词
industrial ecology; life cycle assessment (LCA); policy evaluation; policy process; social learning; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; POLICY; EMISSIONS; IMPACT; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; FOOTPRINT; MATTER; LCA;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.13009
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Industrial ecology (IE) research has well established expertise in accounting for the material stocks, flows, and associated impacts of industrial and consumer activities in a variety of scales and manifestations. As with many other science and social science fields, however, the pathways from IE research findings to policy and business decision-making are often unclear and unsatisfactory. This issue creates a challenge for the application of industrial ecology to sustainable development. By reviewing several strands of literature, this article investigates alternative ways to generate and use research findings to support decision-making and social change. It argues that advances in both the core and the emerging methods in IE complement each other to improve transparency and reliability of research evidence; extension and contextualization of current findings corresponding to different stages in policy-making and organizational decision processes make research evidence more informative; a learning perspective makes research evidence valuable and used in more flexible ways. To better assist decision-making for societal change, more dialogues between researchers of different methodological cultures and between researchers and other stakeholders and a paradigm shift in social systems for which industrial ecologists should be conscious and proactive are required.
引用
收藏
页码:943 / 950
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Trial recruitment decision-making: crucial but not evidence-based
    Treweek, Shaun
    Pitkethly, Marie
    Cook, Jonathan
    Fraser, Cynthia
    Mitchell, Elizabeth
    Sullivan, Frank
    Jackson, Catherine
    Taskila, Tyna
    Gardner, Heidi
    [J]. TRIALS, 2019, 20
  • [32] Complexity, uncertainty and decision-making in an evidence-based world
    Williams, R
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 15 (04) : 343 - 347
  • [33] Patents for evidence-based decision-making and smart specialisation
    Fischer, Bruno Brandao
    Kotsemir, Maxim
    Meissner, Dirk
    Streltsova, Ekaterina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2020, 45 (06): : 1748 - 1774
  • [34] Effect of evidence-based investigation on decision-making in health
    Ramirez Barba, Ector Jaime
    [J]. SALUD PUBLICA DE MEXICO, 2007, 49 : E276 - E276
  • [35] USE OF EVIDENCE-BASED RESULTS IN GOVERNMENTAL DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES IN THE BRAZILIAN MINISTRY OF HEALTH
    Souza, F. M. A.
    Giozza, S. P.
    [J]. SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2013, 89 : A391 - A392
  • [36] Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making
    Kranke, Peter
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 27 (09) : 763 - 772
  • [37] Exploring the intentions of hospital managers to use evidence-based management in decision-making process
    Azar, Suad
    Alolayyan, Main Naser
    Alyahya, Mohammad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2024, 17 (03) : 541 - 548
  • [38] Improved clinical decision-making using the evidence-based approach
    Newman, MG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 129 : 4S - 8S
  • [39] Bayesian Networks For Evidence-Based Decision-Making in Software Engineering
    Misirli, Ayse Tosun
    Bener, Ayse Basar
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2014, 40 (06) : 533 - 554
  • [40] Evidence-based medicine and its role in ethical decision-making
    Borry, P
    Schotsmans, P
    Dierickx, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2006, 12 (03) : 306 - 311