Towards smart farming solutions in the U.S. and South Korea: A comparison of the current status

被引:0
|
作者
Susan AOShaughnessy [1 ]
Minyoung Kim [2 ]
Sangbong Lee [3 ]
Youngjin Kim [3 ]
Heetae Kim [3 ]
John Shekailo [4 ]
机构
[1] USDA-ARS, Conservation and Production Research Laboratory
[2] R&D Coordination Division, Rural Development Administration
[3] National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration
[4] USDA-ARS, Office of International Research Engagement and
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F313 [农业建设与发展];
学科分类号
摘要
Smart farming solutions combine information, data software tools, and technology with the intent to improve agricultural production. While smart farming concepts are well described in the literature, the potential societal impacts of smart farming are less conspicuous. To demonstrate how smart farming solutions could influence future agricultural production, agri-business and rural communities and their constituents, this article compares smart farming approaches and reasons behind the pursuit of smart farming solutions by the U.S. and South Korea. The article compares agricultural assets and productivity among the two countries as well as the technical and societal challenges impacting agricultural production as a basis to understanding the motivations behind and pathways for developing smart farming solutions. In doing so, the article compares some of the technological and social advantages and disadvantages of smart farming, dependending on the choice and implementation of smart farming solutions. The South Korean government has implemented a national policy to establish smart farming communities; a concept that addresses the entire agri-food supply chain. In the U.S., a national plan to develop smart farming technologies does not exist. However, discrete smart farming solutions driven mainly by competition in the private sector have resulted in high-tech solutions that are advancing smart farming concepts. The differences in approaches and reporting of successes and failures between the two countries could facilitate the rate of evolution of successful smart farming solutions, and moreover, could provide pathways to facilitate sustainable development goals in developing countries where smart farming activities are currently underway.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 327
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Russia-South Korea Relations and the U.S. Indo-Pacific Strategy
    Rinna, Anthony, V
    ASIA POLICY, 2020, 15 (04): : 91 - 109
  • [22] Brain gain or brain circulation? U.S. doctoral recipients returning to South Korea
    Jenny J. Lee
    Dongbin Kim
    Higher Education, 2010, 59 : 627 - 643
  • [23] U.S. Tourists Welcome to North Korea
    不详
    NORTH KOREAN REVIEW, 2010, 6 (02) : 121 - 122
  • [24] Enhancing U.S. Engagement with North Korea
    Wit, Joel S.
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL-JAPAN FOCUS, 2007, 5 (03):
  • [25] Precision farming adoption trends in the Southern U.S.
    Zhou, Xia Vivian
    English, Burton C.
    Larson, James A.
    Lambert, Dayton M.
    Roberts, Roland K.
    Boyer, Christopher N.
    Velandia, Margarita
    Falconer, Lawrence L.
    Martin, Steve W.
    Journal of Cotton Science, 2017, 21 (02): : 143 - 155
  • [26] DETERMINANTS OF DECISIONS TO ENTER THE U.S. FARMING SECTOR
    Mishra, Ashok K.
    El-Osta, Hisham S.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2016, 48 (01) : 73 - 98
  • [27] The Impact of Immigration Enforcement on the U.S. Farming Sector
    Kostandini, Genti
    Mykerezi, Elton
    Escalante, Cesar
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 96 (01) : 172 - 192
  • [28] Steamflooding in the U.S. A status report
    Blevins, Ted R., 1600, (42):
  • [29] FORESTRY IN THE U.S. SOUTH: A HISTORY
    不详
    LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE MAGAZINE, 2016, 106 (01) : 128 - 128
  • [30] The South and the Transformation of U.S. Politics
    Grant, Keneshia N.
    JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY, 2021, 87 (01) : 154 - 155