Capital Mobility Based on Onshore-Offshore Arbitrage: Empirical Evidence from India and China

被引:0
|
作者
Aggarwal, Nidhi [1 ]
Arora, Sanchit [2 ]
Sengupta, Rajeswari [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management, Udaipur, India
[2] Deloitte, London, England
[3] Indira Gandhi Inst Dev Res IGIDR, Mumbai, India
[4] Indira Gandhi Inst Dev Res, Gen AK Vaidya Marg,Goregaon East, Mumbai 400065, India
关键词
Capital mobility; No-arbitrage bands; Covered interest parity; Capital controls; Structural breaks; G15; F30; F31; F32; STRUCTURAL-CHANGES;
D O I
10.1007/s11079-024-09787-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper, we empirically examine the changes over time in the degree of capital mobility for India and China. We find that the somewhat haphazard process of capital account liberalisation undertaken by the Indian and Chinese authorities gets reflected in large variations in Covered Interest Parity (CIP) deviations overtime. In recent years, the deviations have become smaller and the no-arbitrage bands have become narrower, implying greater capital mobility for both the countries. However, compared to India, China's capital controls still seem to bind. Over the years, India has achieved greater capital mobility compared to China.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条