Prognostic Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Localized or Locoregionally Advanced Gallbladder Cancer: A Population-Based and Propensity Score Matched SEER Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Xiong, Yi-chen [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Zi-yi [1 ,2 ]
Gong, Albie [3 ]
Wu, Zi-you [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Shi-lei [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Yi-di [1 ,2 ]
Song, Xiao-ling [1 ,2 ]
Chu, Bing-feng [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Xiang-song [1 ,2 ]
Gong, Wei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Xinhua Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Gen Surg, Kongjiang Rd 1665, Shanghai 200082, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Key Lab Biliary Tract Dis Res, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Univ British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
gallbladder cancer; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; propensity score matching; surveillance; epidemiology; and end results (SEER) database; RECTAL-CANCER; RESECTION; SURGERY; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; GEMCITABINE; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1177/10732748241271682
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in gallbladder cancer (GBC) patients remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of NACT on overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) in patients with localized or locoregionally advanced GBC, and to explore possible protective predictors for prognosis. Methods: Data for patients with localized or locoregionally advanced GBC (i.e., categories cTx-cT4, cN0-2, and cM0) from 2004 to 2020 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients in the NACT and non-NACT groups were propensity score matched (PSM) 1:3, and the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were performed to analyze the impact of NACT on OS and CSS. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were applied to identify the possible prognostic factors. Subgroup analysis was conducted to identify patients who would benefit from NACT. Results: Of the 2676 cases included, 78 NACT and 234 non-NACT patients remained after PSM. In localized or locoregionally advanced GBC patients, the median OS of the NACT and non-NACT was 31 and 16 months (log-rank P < 0.01), and the median CSS of NACT and non-NACT was 32 and 17 months (log-rank P < 0.01), respectively. Longer median OS (31 vs 17 months, log-rank P < 0.01) and CSS (32 vs 20 months, log-rank P < 0.01) was associated with NACT compared with surgery alone. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that NACT, stage, and surgery type were prognostic factors for OS and CSS in GBC patients. Subgroup analysis revealed that the survival hazard ratios (HRs) of NACT vs non-NACT for localized or locoregionally advanced GBC patients were significant in most subgroups. Conclusions: NACT may provide therapeutic benefits for localized or locoregionally advanced GBC patients, especially for those with advanced stage, node-positive, poorly differentiated or undifferentiated disease. NACT combined with radical surgery was associated with a survival advantage. Therefore, NACT combined with surgery may provide a better treatment option for resectable GBC patients.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prognostic Value of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: a Population-Based Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
    Cai, Zhibin
    Wei, Youzhu
    Zeng, Siyuan
    Zhou, Yanming
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 84 (01) : 47 - 54
  • [22] Primary Pericardial Mesothelioma: A Population-Based Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
    Brydges, Hilliard
    Yin, Kanhua
    Balasubramaniyan, Ramkumar
    Lawrence, Kyle W.
    Luo, Rongkui
    Karlson, Karl J.
    McAneny, David B.
    Edwards, Niloo M.
    Reardon, Michael J.
    Dobrilovic, Nikola
    SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 34 (03) : 1113 - 1119
  • [23] Obese patients undergoing cystectomy: A population-based, propensity score matched analysis
    Tyson, Mark D.
    Humphreys, Mitchell R.
    Castle, Erik P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 21 (05) : 491 - 495
  • [24] Prognostic Value of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: a Population-Based Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
    Zhibin Cai
    Youzhu Wei
    Siyuan Zeng
    Yanming Zhou
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2022, 84 : 47 - 54
  • [25] Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer: a population-based analysis
    Wei-xiang Qi
    Chunrong Chen
    Shengguang Zhao
    Jiayi Chen
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2022, 27 : 340 - 347
  • [26] Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer: a population-based analysis
    Qi, Wei-Xiang
    Chen, Chunrong
    Zhao, Shengguang
    Chen, Jiayi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 27 (02) : 340 - 347
  • [27] Neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score matched analysis
    Yadav, S.
    Xie, H.
    Riaz, I. B.
    Sharma, P.
    Mahipal, A.
    McWilliams, R.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29
  • [28] Neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score matched analysis
    Yadav, Siddhartha
    Xie, Hao
    Bin-Riaz, Irbaz
    Sharma, Prabin
    Durani, Urshila
    Goyal, Gaurav
    Borah, Bijan
    Borad, Mitesh J.
    Smoot, Rory L.
    Roberts, Lewis R.
    Go, Ronald S.
    McWilliams, Robert R.
    Mahipal, Amit
    EJSO, 2019, 45 (08): : 1432 - 1438
  • [29] A comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine versus docetaxel plus cisplatin in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis
    Liu, Tongxin
    Sun, Quanquan
    Chen, Jing
    Wang, Fangzheng
    Li, Bin
    Qin, Weifeng
    Ye, Zhimin
    Hu, Fujun
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2018, 10 : 6237 - 6245
  • [30] The Impact of Perioperative Radiotherapy on Disease-Specific Survival in Patients with Localized Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma: A Population-Based Propensity-Score Matched Analysis
    Wilhelm, Alexander
    Wiesler, Benjamin
    Kummerli, Christoph
    Gross, Markus W.
    Kettelhack, Christoph
    Mueller, Beat P.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 32 (03) : 1541 - 1549