Does carbon emission trading scheme improve corporate green mergers and acquisitions? Evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises

被引:1
|
作者
Zou, Ling [1 ]
Ma, Jiejing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Accounting, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Jishou Univ, Sch Business, Jishou 416000, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] 168 East Shuanggang Rd, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Carbon emissions trading scheme (CETS); Green mergers and acquisitions (M&A); Media attention; Financing constraints; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-024-05327-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Utilizing the implementation of the Carbon Emission Trading Scheme (CETS) as an external change, we employ a difference-in-difference model to examine its impact and mechanisms on corporate green mergers and acquisitions (M&A). Our study uses a sample of A-share listed companies in the industrial sector from 2007 to 2020. Empirical findings indicate that the CETS significantly promotes corporate green M&A. Further analysis suggests that the CETS promotes corporate green M&A by alleviating financing constraints and increasing media attention. This effect is particularly pronounced in regions with lower marketization degrees, within manufacturing industries, and among non-state-owned enterprises (non-SOEs). Additionally, the CETS primarily promotes corporate mixed green M&As. Notably, the green M&A supported by CETS is larger in scale and leads to improvements in both green innovation performance and overall financial performance post-implementation. This evidence underscores the dual benefits of CETS-induced green M&A, providing both environmental and economic advantages.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does Market-Based Environmental Regulatory Policy Improve Corporate Environmental Performance? Evidence from Carbon Emission Trading in China
    Li, Nan
    Zhang, Huilin
    Zhang, Xiangyan
    Xie, Xin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (02)
  • [32] Effect of Appointed Directors on Corporate Carbon Emission Intensity: Evidence from Mixed-Ownership Reform in Chinese Private Industrial Enterprises
    Qian, Aimin
    Li, Jingyan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (13)
  • [33] Does carbon emission trading scheme really improve the CO2 emission efficiency? Evidence from China's iron and steel industry
    Wu, Rongxin
    Tan, Zhizhou
    Lin, Boqiang
    ENERGY, 2023, 277
  • [34] Does green finance improve carbon emission efficiency? Experimental evidence from China
    Qiying Ran
    Lu Liu
    Asif Razzaq
    Yuxin Meng
    Xiaodong Yang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 48288 - 48299
  • [35] Does green finance improve carbon emission efficiency? Experimental evidence from China
    Ran, Qiying
    Liu, Lu
    Razzaq, Asif
    Meng, Yuxin
    Yang, Xiaodong
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (16) : 48288 - 48299
  • [36] Will carbon emission trading scheme affect industrial investment? Evidence from China's listed companies
    Zheng, Haotian
    Zhang, Caiyun
    Zhang, Xiaoxi
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [38] Does the application of industrial robots promote export green transformation? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises
    Dai, Hangrui
    Yang, Ronghai
    Cao, Rongguang
    Yin, Lei
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2024, 96
  • [39] Can carbon emission trading scheme achieve energy conservation and emission reduction? Evidence from the industrial sector in China
    Hu, Yucai
    Ren, Shenggang
    Wang, Yangjie
    Chen, Xiaohong
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 85
  • [40] Does carbon emission trading scheme inhibit corporate executives' pursuit of excess compensation? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Zhang, Zhao
    Zhang, Feipeng
    Ma, Caoyuan
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2024, 139