Machine Learning Methods to Estimate Individualized Treatment Effects for Use in Health Technology Assessment

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Yingying [1 ]
Kreif, Noemi [1 ,3 ]
Gc., Vijay S. [2 ]
Manca, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York YO10 5DD, England
[2] Univ Huddersfield, Sch Human & Hlth Sci, Huddersfield, England
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Pharm, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
machine learning; causal inference; individualized treatment effect; health technology assessment; observational data; COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSES; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; CAUSAL INFERENCE; HETEROGENEITY;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X241263356
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Recent developments in causal inference and machine learning (ML) allow for the estimation of individualized treatment effects (ITEs), which reveal whether treatment effectiveness varies according to patients' observed covariates. ITEs can be used to stratify health policy decisions according to individual characteristics and potentially achieve greater population health. Little is known about the appropriateness of available ML methods for use in health technology assessment.Methods In this scoping review, we evaluate ML methods available for estimating ITEs, aiming to help practitioners assess their suitability in health technology assessment. We present a taxonomy of ML approaches, categorized by key challenges in health technology assessment using observational data, including handling time-varying confounding and time-to event data and quantifying uncertainty.Results We found a wide range of algorithms for simpler settings with baseline confounding and continuous or binary outcomes. Not many ML algorithms can handle time-varying or unobserved confounding, and at the time of writing, no ML algorithm was capable of estimating ITEs for time-to-event outcomes while accounting for time-varying confounding. Many of the ML algorithms that estimate ITEs in longitudinal settings do not formally quantify uncertainty around the point estimates.Limitations This scoping review may not cover all relevant ML methods and algorithms as they are continuously evolving.Conclusions Existing ML methods available for ITE estimation are limited in handling important challenges posed by observational data when used for cost-effectiveness analysis, such as time-to-event outcomes, time-varying and hidden confounding, or the need to estimate sampling uncertainty around the estimates.Implications ML methods are promising but need further development before they can be used to estimate ITEs for health technology assessments.
引用
收藏
页码:756 / 769
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] TOWARDS INDIVIDUALIZED SURVIVAL PREDICTION IN GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS USING MACHINE LEARNING METHODS
    Vera, L.
    Perez-Beteta, J.
    Molina, D.
    Borras, J. M.
    Benavides, M.
    Barcia, J. A.
    Velasquez, C.
    Albillo, D.
    Lara, P.
    Perez-Garcia, V. M.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 19 : 84 - 84
  • [22] Application of machine learning to estimate building energy use intensities
    Veiga, R. K.
    Veloso, A. C.
    Melo, A. P.
    Lamberts, R.
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2021, 249
  • [23] Machine learning methods for wildfire risk assessment
    Brys, Carlos
    Martinez, David Luis La Red
    Marinelli, Marcelo
    EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2025, 18 (01)
  • [24] An assessment of machine learning methods for robotic discovery
    University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Computer and Info. Sc., Tržaška 25, Ljubljana
    1000, Slovenia
    J. Compt. Inf. Technol., 2008, 4 (247-254): : 247 - 254
  • [25] Assessment of machine learning methods for robotic discovery
    Bratko, Ivan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ITI 2008 30TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INTERFACES, 2008, : 53 - 60
  • [26] RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND MACHINE LEARNING IN SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEWS SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE EVIDENCE PACKAGE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
    Ferizovic, N.
    Rtveladze, K.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S346 - S346
  • [27] RCTs against the Machine: Can Machine Learning Prediction Methods Recover Experimental Treatment Effects?
    Prest, Brian C.
    Wichman, Casey J.
    Palmer, Karen
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2023, 10 (05) : 1231 - 1264
  • [28] Informatics and machine learning methods for health applications
    Shen, Li
    Shi, Xinghua
    Zhao, Zhongming
    Wang, Kai
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2020, 20 (Suppl 11)
  • [29] Informatics and machine learning methods for health applications
    Li Shen
    Xinghua Shi
    Zhongming Zhao
    Kai Wang
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 20
  • [30] Development and Assessment of Machine Learning Models for Individualized Risk Assessment of Mastectomy Skin Flap Necrosis
    Hassan, Abbas M.
    Biaggi, Andrea P.
    Asaad, Malke
    Andejani, Doaa F.
    Liu, Jun
    Offodile, Anaeze C.
    Selber, Jesse C.
    Butler, Charles E.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2023, 278 (01) : E123 - E130