Machine Learning Methods to Estimate Individualized Treatment Effects for Use in Health Technology Assessment

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Yingying [1 ]
Kreif, Noemi [1 ,3 ]
Gc., Vijay S. [2 ]
Manca, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York YO10 5DD, England
[2] Univ Huddersfield, Sch Human & Hlth Sci, Huddersfield, England
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Pharm, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
machine learning; causal inference; individualized treatment effect; health technology assessment; observational data; COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSES; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; CAUSAL INFERENCE; HETEROGENEITY;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X241263356
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Recent developments in causal inference and machine learning (ML) allow for the estimation of individualized treatment effects (ITEs), which reveal whether treatment effectiveness varies according to patients' observed covariates. ITEs can be used to stratify health policy decisions according to individual characteristics and potentially achieve greater population health. Little is known about the appropriateness of available ML methods for use in health technology assessment.Methods In this scoping review, we evaluate ML methods available for estimating ITEs, aiming to help practitioners assess their suitability in health technology assessment. We present a taxonomy of ML approaches, categorized by key challenges in health technology assessment using observational data, including handling time-varying confounding and time-to event data and quantifying uncertainty.Results We found a wide range of algorithms for simpler settings with baseline confounding and continuous or binary outcomes. Not many ML algorithms can handle time-varying or unobserved confounding, and at the time of writing, no ML algorithm was capable of estimating ITEs for time-to-event outcomes while accounting for time-varying confounding. Many of the ML algorithms that estimate ITEs in longitudinal settings do not formally quantify uncertainty around the point estimates.Limitations This scoping review may not cover all relevant ML methods and algorithms as they are continuously evolving.Conclusions Existing ML methods available for ITE estimation are limited in handling important challenges posed by observational data when used for cost-effectiveness analysis, such as time-to-event outcomes, time-varying and hidden confounding, or the need to estimate sampling uncertainty around the estimates.Implications ML methods are promising but need further development before they can be used to estimate ITEs for health technology assessments.
引用
收藏
页码:756 / 769
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The use of nonrandomized evidence to estimate treatment effects in health technology assessment
    Kent, Seamus
    Salcher-Konrad, Maximilian
    Boccia, Stefania
    Bouvy, Jacoline C.
    de Waure, Chiara
    Espin, Jaime
    Facey, Karen
    Nguyen, Mary
    Rejon, Juan C.
    Jonsson, Pall
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2021, 10 (14) : 1035 - 1043
  • [2] USE CASES FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND MACHINE LEARNING METHODS TO SUPPORT HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
    Pitcher, A.
    Halmos, T.
    Poole, L.
    Richards, C.
    Shankar, R.
    Sharma, Y.
    Guerra, I
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S14 - S14
  • [3] Using machine learning to estimate health spillover effects
    Wichmann, Bruno
    Moreira Wichmann, Roberta
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2024, 25 (04): : 717 - 730
  • [4] The use of machine learning methods to estimate aboveground biomass of grasslands: A review
    Morais, Tiago G.
    Teixeira, Ricardo F. M.
    Figueiredo, Mario
    Domingos, Tiago
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 130
  • [5] Use of Machine Learning Methods in the Assessment of Programming Assignments
    Tarcsay, Botond
    Vasic, Jelena
    Perez-Tellez, Fernando
    TEXT, SPEECH, AND DIALOGUE (TSD 2022), 2022, 13502 : 151 - 159
  • [6] INDIVIDUALIZED AND AUTONOMOUS LEARNING AND ASSESSMENT WITH EPORTFOLIO USE
    Pospisilova, L.
    EDULEARN18: 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, : 3026 - 3032
  • [7] Assessment of Machine Learning to Estimate the Individual Treatment Effect of Corticosteroids in Septic Shock
    Pirracchio, Romain
    Hubbard, Alan
    Sprung, Charles L.
    Chevret, Sylvie
    Annane, Djillali
    Blanchet, Jean-Sebastien
    Chevret, Sylvie
    Daniel, Christel
    Devillier, Philippe
    Fleuriet, Jerome
    Francois, Bruno
    Garchon, Henri-Jean
    Grassin-Delyle, Stanislas
    Grimaldi, Lamiae
    Godot, Veronique
    Kedad, Zoubida
    Philippe, Lassalle
    Richly, Maximilian U.
    Rottman, Martin
    Roux, Anne-Laure
    Talini, Luc
    Zeitouni, Karine
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (12)
  • [8] USE OF IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT BAYESIAN METHODS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
    Cooper, Nicola J.
    Spiegelhalter, David
    Bujkiewicz, Sylwia
    Dequen, Pascale
    Sutton, Alex J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2013, 29 (03) : 336 - 342
  • [9] Use of Various Health Technology Assessment Methods for Economic, Clinical and Safety Assessment
    Erfanyukova, Anna
    Gajdos, Ondrej
    Kamensky, Vojtech
    Selcan, Miroslav
    2019 E-HEALTH AND BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE (EHB), 2019,
  • [10] Estimate Petrophysical Properties by Using Machine Learning Methods
    Tran Nguyen Thien Tam
    Dinh Hoang Truong Thanh
    ADVANCES IN RESEARCH ON WATER RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2023, : 475 - 486