A New AI Approach by Acquisition of Characteristics in Human Decision-Making Process

被引:1
|
作者
Zhou, Yuan [1 ]
Khatibi, Siamak [1 ]
机构
[1] Blekinge Inst Technol, Dept Technol & Aesthet, Karlskrona SE-371 79, Sweden
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 13期
关键词
decision-making process; decision strategy; knowledge representation; artificial intelligence; data clustering; COMMON-SENSE; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.3390/app14135469
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Planning and decision making are closely interconnected processes that often occur in tandem, influence and informing each other. Planning usually precedes decision making in the chronological sequence, and it can be viewed as a strategy to make decisions. A comprehensive planning or decision strategy can facilitate effective decisions. Thus, understanding and learning human decision-making strategies has drawn intensive attention from the AI community. For example, applying planning algorithms into reinforcement leaning (RL) can simulate the consequence of different actions and select optimal decisions based on learned models, while inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) learns a reward function and policy from expert demonstration and applies them into new scenarios. Most of these methods work based on learning human decision strategies by using modeling of a Markovian decision-making process (MDP). In this paper, we argue that the property of MDP is not fit for human decision-making processes in the real-world and it is insufficient to capture human decision strategies. To tackle this challenge, we propose a new approach to identify the characteristics of human decision-making processes as a decision map, where the decision strategy is defined by the probability distribution of human decisions that are adaptive to the dynamic changes in the environment. The proposed approach was inspired by imitation learning (IL) but with fundamental differences: (a) Instead of aiming to learn an optimal policy based on expert's demonstrations, we aimed to estimate the distribution of decisions of any group of people. (b) Instead of modeling the environment by an MDP, we used an ambiguity probability model to consider the uncertainty of each decision. (c) The participant trajectory was obtained by categorizing each decision of a participant to a certain cluster based on the commonness in the distribution of decisions. The result shows a feasible way to capture human long-term decision dependency, which provides a complement to the existing machine learning methods for understanding and learning human decision strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PROCESS TRACING OF DECISION-MAKING - AN APPROACH FOR ANALYSIS OF HUMAN MACHINE INTERACTIONS IN DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS
    SUNDSTROM, GA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MAN-MACHINE STUDIES, 1991, 35 (06): : 843 - 858
  • [32] Effective human-AI work design for collaborative decision-making
    Jain, Ruchika
    Garg, Naval
    Khera, Shikha N.
    KYBERNETES, 2023, 52 (11) : 5017 - 5040
  • [33] Experimental evidence of effective human–AI collaboration in medical decision-making
    Carlo Reverberi
    Tommaso Rigon
    Aldo Solari
    Cesare Hassan
    Paolo Cherubini
    Andrea Cherubini
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [34] Human Control and Discretion in AI-driven Decision-making in Government
    Mitrou, Lilian
    Janssen, Marijn
    Loukis, Euripidis
    14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THEORY AND PRACTICE OF ELECTRONIC GOVERNANCE (ICEGOV 2021), 2021, : 10 - 16
  • [35] Failures in the Loop: Human Leadership in AI-Based Decision-Making
    Michael, Katina
    Schoenherr, Jordan Richard
    Vogel, Kathleen M.
    IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, 2024, 5 (01): : 2 - 13
  • [36] From Recruitment to Retention: AI Tools for Human Resource Decision-Making
    Madanchian, Mitra
    Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 2024, 14 (24):
  • [37] Correction to: Human–AI collaborative decision-making as an organization design problem
    Phanish Puranam
    Journal of Organization Design, 2021, 10 : 81 - 81
  • [38] Explanations, Fairness, and Appropriate Reliance in Human-AI Decision-Making
    Schoeffer, Jakob
    De-Arteaga, Maria
    Kuehl, Niklas
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYTEMS (CHI 2024), 2024,
  • [39] Introduction of New Vaccines: Decision-making Process in Bangladesh
    Uddin, Jasim
    Sarma, Haribondhu
    Bari, Tajul I.
    Koehlmoos, Tracey P.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH POPULATION AND NUTRITION, 2013, 31 (02) : 211 - 217
  • [40] A New Multi-Objective Decision-Making Approach Applied to the Tennessee Eastman Process
    Tidriri, Khaoula
    Tiplica, Teodor
    Chatti, Nizar
    Verron, Sylvain
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2018, 51 (24): : 1212 - 1219