A Machine Learning Framework for Melt-Pool Geometry Prediction and Process Parameter Optimization in the Laser Powder-Bed Fusion Process

被引:1
|
作者
Rahman, M. Shafiqur [1 ]
Sattar, Naw Safrin [2 ]
Ahmed, Radif Uddin [1 ]
Ciaccio, Jonathan [3 ]
Chakravarty, Uttam K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana Tech Univ, Dept Mech Engn, 505 Tech Dr, Ruston, LA 71270 USA
[2] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, 1 Bethel Valley Rd, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 USA
[3] Univ New Orleans, Dept Mech Engn, 2000 Lakeshore Dr, New Orleans, LA 70148 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
laser powder-bed fusion; Ti-6Al-4V; machine learning; melt-pool width; melt-pool depth; optimization; sensitivity;
D O I
10.1115/1.4065687
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
This study presents a cost-effective and high-precision machine learning (ML) method for predicting the melt-pool geometry and optimizing the process parameters in the laser powder-bed fusion (LPBF) process with Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Unlike many ML models, the presented method incorporates five key features, including three process parameters (laser power, scanning speed, and spot size) and two material parameters (layer thickness and powder porosity). The target variables are the melt-pool width and depth that collectively define the melt-pool geometry and give insight into the melt-pool dynamics in LPBF. The dataset integrates information from an extensive literature survey, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling, and laser melting experiments. Multiple ML regression methods are assessed to determine the best model to predict the melt-pool geometry. Tenfold cross-validation is applied to evaluate the model performance using five evaluation metrics. Several data pre-processing, augmentation, and feature engineering techniques are performed to improve the accuracy of the models. Results show that the "Extra Trees regression" and "Gaussian process regression" models yield the least errors for predicting melt-pool width and depth, respectively. The ML modeling results are compared with the experimental and CFD modeling results to validate the proposed ML models. The most influential parameter affecting the melt-pool geometry is also determined by the sensitivity analysis. The processing parameters are optimized using an iterative grid search method employing the trained ML models. The presented ML framework offers computational speed and simplicity, which can be implemented in other additive manufacturing techniques to comprehend the critical traits.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Identification and Interpretation of Melt Pool Shapes in Laser Powder Bed Fusion with Machine Learning
    Sato, Matthew M.
    Wong, Vivian W. H.
    Yeung, Ho
    Witherell, Paul
    Law, Kincho H.
    SMART AND SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2024, 8 (01):
  • [22] Modelling of keyhole dynamics and melt pool flow in laser powder bed fusion process
    Li, Erlei
    Zhou, Zongyan
    Wang, Lin
    Zou, Ruiping
    Yu, Aibing
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 400
  • [23] Experimental analysis of spatter generation and melt-pool behavior during the powder bed laser beam melting process
    Gunenthiram, V.
    Peyre, P.
    Schneider, M.
    Dal, M.
    Coste, F.
    Koutiri, I.
    Fabbro, R.
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 251 : 376 - 386
  • [24] Melt pool geometry and morphology variability for the Inconel 718 alloy in a laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process
    Scime, Luke
    Beuth, Jack
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2019, 29
  • [25] An alloy-agnostic machine learning framework for process mapping in laser powder bed fusion
    Wilkinson, Toby
    Casata, Massimiliano
    Barba, Daniel
    RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2024, 30 (11) : 302 - 323
  • [26] COMPARISON OF MACHINE LEARNING MODELS AND ANALYTICAL SCALING LAW FOR PREDICTING MELT-POOL DEPTH IN LASER POWDER BED FUSION (LPBF) ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
    Bai, Feiyang
    Arikatla, Siva Surya Prakash Reddy
    Zhang, Nian
    Gebre, Fisseha L.
    Xu, Jiajun
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, IMECE2023, VOL 3, 2023,
  • [27] A machine learning methodology for porosity classification and process map prediction in laser powder bed fusion
    Staszewska, Adrianna
    Patil, Deepali P.
    Dixith, Akshatha C.
    Neamtu, Rodica
    Lados, Diana A.
    PROGRESS IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2024, 9 (06) : 1901 - 1911
  • [28] Model Predictive Control of Melt Pool Size for the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process Under Process Uncertainty
    Xi, Zhimin
    ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART B-MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 8 (01):
  • [29] MACHINE LEARNING ASSISTED PREDICTION OF THE MANUFACTURABILITY OF LASER-BASED POWDER BED FUSION PROCESS
    Zhang, Ying
    Dong, Guoying
    Yang, Sheng
    Zhao, Yaoyao Fiona
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2019, VOL 1, 2020,
  • [30] A Physics-Informed Two-Level Machine-Learning Model for Predicting Melt-Pool Size in Laser Powder Bed Fusion
    Ren, Yong
    Wang, Qian
    Michaleris, Panagiotis
    JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2021, 143 (12):