Causal inference in health and disease: a review of the principles and applications of Mendelian randomization

被引:0
|
作者
Lovegrove, Catherine E. [1 ]
Howles, Sarah A. [1 ]
Furniss, Dominic [2 ]
Holmes, Michael, V [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Surg Sci, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Bristol, MRC, Bristol, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
epidemiology; genetic association studies; human association studies; mendelian randomization; therapeutics; TYPE-2; DIABETES-MELLITUS; GENETIC-VARIANTS; INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES; RISK; PCSK9; BIAS; ASSOCIATION; HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA; EPIDEMIOLOGISTS; DAPAGLIFLOZIN;
D O I
10.1093/jbmr/zjae136
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Mendelian randomization (MR) is a genetic epidemiological technique that uses genetic variation to infer causal relationships between modifiable exposures and outcome variables. Conventional observational epidemiological studies are subject to bias from a range of sources; MR analyses can offer an advantage in that they are less prone to bias as they use genetic variants inherited at conception as "instrumental variables", which are proxies of an exposure. However, as with all research tools, MR studies must be carefully designed to yield valuable insights into causal relationships between exposures and outcomes, and to avoid biased or misleading results that undermine the validity of the causal inferences drawn from the study. In this review, we outline Mendel's laws of inheritance, the assumptions and principles that underlie MR, MR study designs and methods, and how MR analyses can be applied and reported. Using the example of serum phosphate concentrations on liability to kidney stone disease we illustrate how MR estimates may be visualized and, finally, we contextualize MR in bone and mineral research including exemplifying how this technique could be employed to inform clinical studies and future guidelines concerning BMD and fracture risk. This review provides a framework to enhance understanding of how MR may be used to triangulate evidence and progress research in bone and mineral metabolism as we strive to infer causal effects in health and disease. Mendelian randomization is a powerful tool used by researchers to understand how factors like lifestyle choices or medical conditions affect our health. Some research studies can be hampered by inaccurate information or measurements which mean the results are unreliable. Mendelian randomization uses genetic information to evade this problem. Because a person's genetic information does not change the studies can provide more reliable conclusions about how different factors influence our health. This review provides an overview of Mendelian randomization principles, its applications, and how researchers in bone and mineral research have used it to uncover cause-and-effect relationships.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mendelian randomization analyses in ocular disease: a powerful approach to causal inference with human genetic data
    Jiaxin Li
    Cong Li
    Yu Huang
    Peng Guan
    Desheng Huang
    Honghua Yu
    Xiaohong Yang
    Lei Liu
    [J]. Journal of Translational Medicine, 20
  • [22] Bayesian weighted Mendelian randomization for causal inference based on summary statistics
    Zhao, Jia
    Ming, Jingsi
    Hu, Xianghong
    Chen, Gang
    Liu, Jin
    Yang, Can
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2020, 36 (05) : 1501 - 1508
  • [23] Mendelian randomization: use of genetics to enable causal inference in observational studies
    Verduijn, Marion
    Siegerink, Bob
    Jager, Kitty J.
    Zoccali, Carmine
    Dekker, Friedo W.
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 25 (05) : 1394 - 1398
  • [24] A research note on Mendelian randomization and causal inference in criminology: promises and considerations
    Boutwell, Brian B.
    Adams, Charleen D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CRIMINOLOGY, 2022, 18 (01) : 171 - 182
  • [25] A research note on Mendelian randomization and causal inference in criminology: promises and considerations
    Brian B. Boutwell
    Charleen D. Adams
    [J]. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2022, 18 : 171 - 182
  • [26] Association between bilirubin and cardiovascular disease risk factors: using Mendelian randomization to assess causal inference
    Patrick F McArdle
    Brian W Whitcomb
    Keith Tanner
    Braxton D Mitchell
    Alan R Shuldiner
    Afshin Parsa
    [J]. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 12
  • [27] Association between bilirubin and cardiovascular disease risk factors: using Mendelian randomization to assess causal inference
    McArdle, Patrick F.
    Whitcomb, Brian W.
    Tanner, Keith
    Mitchell, Braxton D.
    Shuldiner, Alan R.
    Parsa, Afshin
    [J]. BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2012, 12
  • [28] Commentary: Mendelian randomization-inspired causal inference in the absence of genetic data
    Zuccolo, Luisa
    Holmes, Michael V.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 46 (03) : 962 - 965
  • [29] Mendelian Randomization in Stroke: A Powerful Approach to Causal Inference and Drug Target Validation
    Acosta, Julian N.
    Szejko, Natalia
    Falcone, Guido J.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2021, 12
  • [30] Causal Inference for Highly Pleiotropic Biomarkers Using Mendelian Randomization and Bayesian Networks
    Howey, Richard
    Cordell, Heather J.
    [J]. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 43 (07) : 883 - 883