Characteristics of strong ground motions and structural damage patterns from the February 6th, 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquakes, Turkiye

被引:2
|
作者
Akinci, Aybige [1 ]
Dindar, Ahmet Anil [2 ]
Bal, Ihsan E. [3 ]
Ertuncay, Deniz [4 ,5 ]
Smyrou, Eleni [3 ]
Cheloni, Daniele [1 ]
机构
[1] Ist Nazl Geofis & Vulcanol, Via Vigna Murata 605, I-00143 Rome, Italy
[2] Gebze Tech Univ, Marmara Res & Training Ctr Disaster Resilient Stru, TR-41400 Kocaeli, Turkiye
[3] Hanze Univ Appl Sci Groningen, Res Ctr Built Environm Noorder Ruimte, NL-9701 DA Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Trieste, Dept Math Informat & Geosci, SeisRaM Working Grp, Via Eduardo Turkey,Weiss 4, I-34128 Trieste, Italy
[5] Natl Inst Oceanog & Appl Geophys OGS, Ctr Seismol Res, Via Treviso 55, I-33100 Udine, Italy
关键词
Kahramanmaras earthquakes; Ground motions; Pulse-like motion; Building damage; Seismic hazard; SEA FAULT ZONE; PREDICTIVE MODEL; FLING-STEP; DIRECTIVITY; EVOLUTION; DEMAND; PGV;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-024-06856-y
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
On February 6th, 2023, two severe earthquakes struck southeastern Turkiye near the Syrian border. The first earthquake, Mw7.8, occurred at 04:17 local time in the East Anatolian Fault Zone near the city of Gaziantep. The second earthquake, Mw7.5, occurred approximately 9 h later at 13:24 local time near Elbistan County, in Kahramanmaras province. These seismic events ruptured multiple segments of the East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ), with rupture lengths exceeding 300 km, and deformation exceeding 5 m on both sides of the faults. In this study, we aim to analyze characteristics of the strong ground motion induced by the mainshocks, focusing on ground motion intensity measures such as the peak ground acceleration (PGA), the peak ground velocity (PGV), and the pseudo-acceleration response spectra (PSA). The first earthquake produced extremely high PGA values in both horizontal (> 2 g) and vertical (> 1 g) components. At near field distances, large PGVs are measured (> 180 cm/s) with more than 30 impulsive motions which may indicate source-related effects. Large spectral demands are also recorded for both earthquakes, partially underestimated by Ground Motion Models (GMMs), especially in the near-field. Specifically, we compare the PSA for horizontal directions with the design spectra provided by both the new and previous Turkish building codes. We also present building and ground damage observations that provide insights into the observed ground motions in the heavily damaged areas.
引用
收藏
页码:1209 / 1239
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The performance of transmission pipelines on february 6th, 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquake: a series of case studies (jul, 10.1007/s10518-024-01957-2, 2024)
    Uckan, E.
    Aksel, M.
    Atas, O.
    Toprak, S.
    Kaya, E. S.
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2025, 23 (03) : 1223 - 1223
  • [42] Characteristics of the strong ground motions from the 6 April 2009 L'Aquila earthquake, Italy
    Akinci, Aybige
    Malagnini, Luca
    Sabetta, Fabio
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2010, 30 (05) : 320 - 335
  • [43] Characteristics of Strong Ground Motions from Four MS ≥ 5.0 Earthquakes in the 2021 Yangbi, Southwest China, Seismic Sequence
    Qiang, Shengyin
    Wang, Hongwei
    Wen, Ruizhi
    Ren, Yefei
    Cui, Jianwen
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2023, 27 (14) : 3957 - 3974
  • [44] Source Parameters of Strong Turkish Earthquakes on February 6, 2023 (Mw=7.8 and Mw=7.7) from Surface Wave Data
    Filippova, A. I.
    Fomochkina, A. S.
    IZVESTIYA-PHYSICS OF THE SOLID EARTH, 2023, 59 (06) : 899 - 911
  • [45] Source Parameters of Strong Turkish Earthquakes on February 6, 2023 (Mw = 7.8 and Mw = 7.7) from Surface Wave Data
    A. I. Filippova
    A. S. Fomochkina
    Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 2023, 59 : 899 - 911
  • [46] Code-based damage assessment of existing precast industrial buildings following the February 6th, 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes (Pazarcık Mw 7.7 and Elbistan Mw7.6)
    Arslan, Musa Hakan
    Dere, Yunus
    Ecemis, Ali Serdar
    Dogan, Gamze
    Ozturk, Murat
    Korkmaz, Serra Zerrin
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2024, 86
  • [47] Field Observations and Numerical Investigations on Seismic Damage Assessment of RC and Masonry Minarets During the February 6th, 2023, Kahramanmaraş (Mw 7.7 Pazarcık and Mw 7.6 Elbistan) Earthquakes in Türkiye
    Atmaca, Barbaros
    Atmaca, Esin Erturk
    Roudane, Boudjamaa
    Gules, Osman
    Demirkaya, Eren
    Aykanat, Batuhan
    Altunisik, Ahmet Can
    Gunaydin, Murat
    Arslan, Mehmet Emin
    Kahya, Volkan
    Tatar, Tuba
    Aslan, Banu
    Sezdirmez, Tugrul
    Sunca, Fezayil
    Okur, Fatih Yesevi
    Adanur, Suleyman
    Saribiyik, Ali
    Aydin, Ferhat
    Genc, Ali Fuat
    Kirtel, Osman
    Demir, Aydin
    Ozturk, Hakan
    Dok, Goekhan
    Emiroglu, Mehmet
    Akgul, Tahir
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE, 2024,
  • [48] Near-fault ground motion characteristics and its effects on a collapsed reinforced concrete structure in Hatay during the February 6, 2023 Mw7.8 Kahramanmaras, earthquake
    Kazaz, Ilker
    Bilge, Ismail Hakki
    Gurbuz, Muhammed
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2024, 298
  • [49] In-situ investigation of site liquefaction and liquefaction-induced damages triggered by two strong Türkiye earthquakes on Feb. 6th, 2023
    Chen, Longwei
    Liu, Haoru
    Ren, Yefei
    Wu, Xiaoyang
    Yuan, Xiaoming
    Yantu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46 (07): : 1541 - 1548
  • [50] Near-field velocity pulse-like ground motions on February 6, 2018 Mw6.4 Hualien, Taiwan earthquake and structural damage implications
    Ji, Kun
    Ren, Yefei
    Wen, Ruizhi
    Kuo, Chun-Hsiang
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2019, 126