Evaluation of Shear Strength and Stiffness of a Loess-Sand Mixture in Triaxial and Unconfined Compression Tests

被引:0
|
作者
Tankiewicz, Matylda [1 ]
Kowalska, Magdalena [2 ]
Monka, Jakub [1 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Univ Environm & Life Sci, Dept Civil Engn, Norwida 25, PL-50375 Wroclaw, Poland
[2] Silesian Tech Univ, Dept Geotech & Rd, Akademicka 5, PL-44100 Gliwice, Poland
关键词
loess; triaxial test; piezoceramic elements; unconfined compression; stiffness; shear strength; SMALL-STRAIN STIFFNESS; FINE-GRAINED SOIL; DYNAMIC PROPERTIES; DAMPING RATIO; MODULUS; CLAY;
D O I
10.3390/ma17153831
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Mechanical soil parameters are not constants and can be defined in various ways. Therefore, determination of their values for engineering practice is difficult. This problem is discussed based on results of piezoceramic element tests and triaxial tests (unconfined and confined) on loess specimens improved by compaction and sand admixture (20% by weight). The study indicated also the effectiveness of this simple method of loess stabilization. The influence of specimen size, draining conditions, stress and strain state, and different calculation methods on the evaluation of basic mechanical parameters were analyzed. The initial shear and Young's moduli, the degradation of secant moduli with strain, tangent moduli, and Poisson' ratio were determined. The results showed that the shear strength parameters are much less sensitive to the test variables than the stiffness parameters are. In triaxial tests, the strength criterion adopted, the sample size, and the drainage conditions influenced the measured value of cohesion, with a much smaller impact on the angle of internal friction. On the other hand, the adopted definition of the parameter and the range of strains had the greatest influence on the value of the stiffness modulus. Moreover, larger specimens were usually found to be stiffer.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Shear strength of grouted clay: comparison of triaxial tests to direct shear tests
    Yin, Zhanchao
    Zhang, Qingsong
    Zhang, Xiao
    Zhang, Jiaqi
    Li, Xianghui
    BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 81 (07)
  • [32] True triaxial tests and strength characteristics of silty sand
    Hu Ping
    Huang Mao-song
    Ma Shao-kun
    Lu Xi-lin
    ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2011, 32 (02) : 465 - 470
  • [33] Ring shear tests on shear strength of calcareous sand
    Huang Hong-xiang
    Chen Yu-min
    Wang Jian-ping
    Liu Han-long
    Zhou Xiao-zhi
    Huo Zheng-ge
    ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2018, 39 (06) : 2082 - 2088
  • [34] Deformation characteristics of liquefied loose sand by triaxial compression tests
    Nagase, H
    Hiro-oka, A
    Yanagihata, T
    DEFORMATION AND PROGRESSIVE FAILURE IN GEOMECHANICS - IS-NAGOYA'97, 1997, : 559 - 564
  • [35] Comparison of extension and compression triaxial tests for dense sand and sandstone
    A. Corfdir
    J. Sulem
    Acta Geotechnica, 2008, 3
  • [36] Comparison of extension and compression triaxial tests for dense sand and sandstone
    Corfdir, A.
    Sulem, J.
    ACTA GEOTECHNICA, 2008, 3 (03) : 241 - 246
  • [37] Comparison of sand liquefaction in cyclic triaxial and simple shear tests
    Nong, Zhen-Zhen
    Park, Sung-Sik
    Lee, Dong-Eun
    SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2021, 61 (04) : 1071 - 1085
  • [38] Stiffness of sedimentary soft rooks evaluated by triaxial compression tests
    Tatsuoka, F
    Kohata, Y
    Tsubouchi, T
    Ochi, K
    EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ROCK MECHANICS, VOL 3, PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : 1201 - 1204
  • [39] DYNAMIC SOIL STRENGTH PARAMETERS FROM UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TESTS
    FLENNIKEN, JM
    HEFNER, RE
    WEBER, JA
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1977, 20 (01): : 21 - &
  • [40] Mobilized strength components of Athabasca oil sand in triaxial compression
    Wong, RCK
    CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 36 (04) : 718 - 735