Recommendations from evaluating the implementation of the 'GP Daffodil Standards' to support the provision of palliative and end-of-life care in primary care: a mixed-methods study

被引:0
|
作者
Sivell, Stephanie [1 ]
Price, Delyth [1 ]
Hope, Isabel [1 ]
Carson-Stevens, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
来源
关键词
D O I
10.3399/bjgp24X737721
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The 'GP Daffodil Standards for Advanced Serious Illness and End of Life Care' was launched by the Royal College of General Practitioners and Marie Curie in 2019 to support improvement of end-of-life care activity in primary care. AIM: To undertake and independent evaluation of the implementation of the Daffodil Standards. METHOD: A multi-method evaluation, informed by Normalisation Process Theory. An online survey with GPs in the UK (Phase 1) and semi-structured interviews with a sub-sample of survey responders (Phase 2) were used to map end-of-life activities and understand the use of the standards. Illustrative case studies of good practice were used to outline recommendations to improve and sustain the implementation of the standards (Phase 3). Data were analysed both quantitatively (Phase 1: descriptive statistics) and qualitatively (Phases 2 and 3: framework analysis). RESULTS: For the Phase 1 survey (n = 82) and Phase 2 semi-structured interviews (n = 8), results demonstrated the motivation to undertake end-of-life care activities and active use of the standards. GPs find it difficult to take this further because of limitations in resources and capacity. There is the indication that a misperception exists for both the purpose and role of the standards. For Phase 3, two case studies are complete, providing more in-depth practical insights into the planning, use, and implementation of the standards. All data collection stopped in December 2023. CONCLUSION: Final results were reported and best practice shared, along with recommendations to sustain the ongoing implementation of the Daffodil Standards. © British Journal of General Practice 2024.
引用
收藏
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluating the implementation of national recommendations on multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms in end-of-life care
    Heckel, Maria
    Illig, Annabell
    Brunner, Sarah
    Ostgathe, Christoph
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2020, 158 : 47 - 53
  • [32] What Helps or Hinders End-of-Life Care in Adult Intensive Care Units in Saudi Arabia? A Mixed-Methods Study Protocol
    Almalki, Nabat
    Boyle, Breidge
    O'Halloran, Peter
    HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (23)
  • [33] Palliative and end-of-life care needs, experiences, and preferences of LGBTQ plus individuals with serious illness: A systematic mixed-methods review
    Rosa, William E.
    Roberts, Kailey E.
    Braybrook, Debbie
    Harding, Richard
    Godwin, Kendra
    Mahoney, Cassidy
    Mathew, Shiyon
    Atkinson, Thomas M.
    Banerjee, Smita C.
    Haviland, Kelly
    Hughes, Tonda L.
    Walters, Chasity B.
    Parker, Patricia A.
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 37 (04) : 460 - 474
  • [34] Shifting palliative care paradigm in primary care from better death to better end-of-life: a Swiss pilot study
    Johanna Sommer
    Christopher Chung
    Dagmar M. Haller
    Sophie Pautex
    BMC Health Services Research, 21
  • [35] Shifting palliative care paradigm in primary care from better death to better end-of-life: a Swiss pilot study
    Sommer, Johanna
    Chung, Christopher
    Haller, Dagmar M.
    Pautex, Sophie
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [36] A Methodological Review of Mixed Methods Research in Palliative and End-of-Life Care (2014-2019)
    Fabregues, Sergi
    Quan Nha Hong
    Lucia Escalante-Barrios, Elsa
    Guetterman, Timothy C.
    Meneses, Julio
    Fetters, Michael D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (11) : 1 - 16
  • [37] Palliative and end of life care in prisons: a mixed-methods rapid review of the literature from 2014-2018
    McParland, Chris
    Johnston, Bridget Margaret
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (12):
  • [38] Optimum hospice at home services for end-of-life care: protocol of a mixed-methods study employing realist evaluation
    Butler, Claire
    Brigden, Charlotte
    Gage, Heather
    Williams, Peter
    Holdsworth, Laura
    Greene, Kay
    Wee, Bee
    Barclay, Stephen
    Wilson, Patricia
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (05):
  • [39] MORECare research methods guidance development: Recommendations for ethical issues in palliative and end-of-life care research
    Gysels, Marjolein
    Evans, Catherine J.
    Lewis, Penney
    Speck, Peter
    Benalia, Hamid
    Preston, Nancy J.
    Grande, Gunn E.
    Short, Vicky
    Owen-Jones, Eleanor
    Todd, Chris J.
    Higginson, Irene J.
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 27 (10) : 908 - 917
  • [40] End-of-life care preferences of older patients with multimorbidity: protocol of a mixed-methods systematic review
    Isabel Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Ana
    Schmucker, Christine
    Nothacker, Julia
    Nguyen, Truc Sophia
    Brueckle, Maria-Sophie
    Blom, Jeanet
    van den Akker, Marjan
    Roettger, Kristian
    Wegwarth, Odette
    Hoffmann, Tammy
    Gerlach, Ferdinand M.
    Straus, Sharon E.
    Meerpohl, Joerg J.
    Muth, Christiane
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (07): : e038682