"Fengqiao Model" and the Structural Changes of Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in China

被引:0
|
作者
Peng, Xiaolong [1 ]
机构
[1] Renmin Univ China, Law Sch, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
关键词
Fengqiao Model; diversified dispute resolution; structure of dispute resolution mechanisms; state intervention; social governance;
D O I
10.3868/s050-013-024-0002-1
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
As the idea of diversified dispute resolution becomes common sense, the structural relations of different dispute resolution mechanisms have become the focus of practice reforms and theoretical controversies in China. The 60- year development of the " Fengqiao Model" has always focused on the overall design of the dispute resolution system, which provides a foundation and plenty of materials for understanding these structural relationships. Combined with the development of social theory, this paper summarizes a general structural theory of dispute resolution mechanisms based on the " Fengqiao Model." This theory advocates that the structure of dispute resolution mechanisms is the outcome of the integration of state intervention, social self- regulatory, and their interactions with various dispute resolution mechanisms. It can be used to explain the formation and change of the dispute resolution system in China, the structural strain in recent years, the overall plan of structural adjustment since 2012, and the next strategic core of profound adjustment. It also can be used to explain why the " Fengqiao Model" is so persistent and widely applicable, and how the " Fengqiao Model" be converted from a local model to an overall requirement, showing the great meaning of adhering to and developing the " Fengqiao Model" at present.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dispute Resolution in China: Litigation, Arbitration, Mediation, and their Interactions
    Liu, Sida
    SOCIAL & LEGAL STUDIES, 2022, 31 (05) : 796 - 798
  • [42] Chinese Justice: Civil Dispute Resolution in Contemporary China
    Neudorf, Lorne
    CAMBRIDGE LAW JOURNAL, 2012, 71 (02): : 454 - 456
  • [43] A computational model of facilitation in online dispute resolution
    Branting, Karl
    McLeod, Sarah
    Howell, Sarah
    Weiss, Brandy
    Profitt, Brett
    Tanner, James
    Gross, Ian
    Shin, David
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW, 2023, 31 (03) : 465 - 490
  • [44] LEADING THE WAY IN DISPUTE RESOLUTION - THE OHIO MODEL
    HARBERT, L
    POLLACK, D
    ARBITRATION JOURNAL, 1990, 45 (02): : 56 - 58
  • [45] Alternative Dispute Resolution in Ireland and the US Model
    Teague, Paul
    Roche, William
    Currie, Denise
    Gormley, Tom
    ILR REVIEW, 2020, 73 (02) : 345 - 365
  • [46] A computational model of facilitation in online dispute resolution
    Karl Branting
    Sarah McLeod
    Sarah Howell
    Brandy Weiss
    Brett Profitt
    James Tanner
    Ian Gross
    David Shin
    Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2023, 31 : 465 - 490
  • [47] Organizational dispute resolution systems: A complementarities model
    Bendersky, C
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2003, 28 (04): : 643 - 656
  • [48] THE POTENTIALS AND LIMITATIONS OF TAX DISPUTE PREVENTION AND ALTERNATIVE RESOLUTION MECHANISMS
    Kovac, Polonca
    ZBORNIK PRAVNOG FAKULTETA SVEUCILISTA U RIJECI, 2018, 39 (04): : 1505 - 1531
  • [49] Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in Colombia and Russia: Conciliation and Mediation
    Arrieta Lopez, Milton
    Meza Godoy, Abel
    Vladimirovich Afanasiev, Ilya
    Dmitriyevich Sekerin, Vladimir
    Noli, Sara
    JUSTICIA, 2021, 26 (40) : 128 - 142
  • [50] Using alternative dispute resolution mechanisms to resolve patent disputes
    Levine, Russell E.
    Topic, Matthew V.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW & PRACTICE, 2012, 7 (02) : 119 - 125