Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration on positive peritoneal lavage cytology in patients with resectable pancreatic body and tail cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Ishii, Yasutaka [1 ]
Serikawa, Masahiro [1 ]
Uemura, Kenichiro [2 ]
Tatsukawa, Yumiko [1 ]
Nakamura, Shinya [1 ]
Ikemoto, Juri [1 ]
Miyamoto, Sayaka [1 ]
Arihiro, Koji [3 ]
Takahashi, Shinya [2 ]
Oka, Shiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Biomed & Hlth Sci, Dept Gastroenterol, Hiroshima, Japan
[2] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Biomed & Hlth Sci, Dept Surg, 1-2-3 Kasumi,Minami Ku, Hiroshima 7348551, Japan
[3] Hiroshima Univ Hosp, Dept Anat Pathol, Hiroshima, Japan
关键词
endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration; pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; peritoneal lavage cytology; prognosis; recurrence; DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA; RECURRENCE; FNA;
D O I
10.1002/jhbp.12064
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/PurposeA recent study has demonstrated that the timing of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) significantly influences the peritoneal lavage cytology (CY) outcomes in pancreatic body-tail cancer. The aim of this study was to clarify the impact of EUS-FNA on CY positivity in patients with resectable pancreatic body-tail cancer.MethodsPatients with anatomically resectable pancreatic body-tail cancer surgically resected at Hiroshima University Hospital were enrolled, and elated clinicopathological factors, including EUS-FNA variables and CY positivity rate, were analyzed.ResultsOf the 129 eligible patients, 16 (12%) had positive CY. The EUS-FNA rates of the CY-positive and CY-negative groups were not significantly different (63% vs. 52%, p = .440). Multivariate analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis was the only independent risk factor for CY positivity (odds ratio: 5.734, p = .031). A total of 10 (14%) of the 69 patients who underwent EUS-FNA had positive CY; however, needle specifications and the interval between EUS-FNA and CY examination did not differ between the CY-positive and CY-negative groups. CY positivity rates were comparable for intervals <= 14 days and >= 15 days (17% vs. 14%, p = 1.000).ConclusionsEUS-FNA may not affect CY positivity in patients with resectable pancreatic body-tail cancer, regardless of the timing.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Utility of Repeat Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration for Suspected Pancreatic Cancer
    Nicaud, Mark
    Hou, Wei
    Collins, Dennis
    Wagh, Mihir S.
    Chauhan, Shailendra
    Draganov, Peter V.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2010, 2010
  • [42] Development of an endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology service: A review
    Menon, S. S.
    Kapadia, S. A.
    Maleki, K.
    Hollingsworth, T.
    Fisher, N. C.
    GUT, 2007, 56 : A17 - A18
  • [43] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology and biopsy in the evaluation of lymphoma
    Gimeno-Garcia, Antonio Z.
    Elwassief, Ahmed
    Paquin, Sarto C.
    Sahai, Anand V.
    ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND, 2012, 1 (01) : 17 - 22
  • [44] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of gangliocytic paraganglioma of the duodenum
    Tejerina, E.
    Plaza, C.
    Prados, S.
    Lopez Rios, F.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2017, 471 : S242 - S242
  • [45] Repeat Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Patients With Suspected Pancreatic Neoplasm
    Desai, Svetang V.
    Watson, James B.
    Spaete, Joshua
    Philcox, Stephen
    Heacock, Michael
    Jowell, Paul
    Obando, Jorge V.
    Burbridge, Rebecca
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 146 (05) : S278 - S278
  • [46] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: cytomorphological and immunocytochemical evaluation
    Chang, F
    Vu, C
    Chandra, A
    Meenan, J
    Herbert, A
    CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2006, 17 (01) : 10 - 17
  • [47] Repeat Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Patients With Suspected Pancreatic Neoplasm
    Philcox, S. M.
    Burbridge, R.
    Heacock, M.
    Obando, J.
    Jowell, P.
    PANCREAS, 2009, 38 (08) : 1038 - 1038
  • [48] Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Vs Biopsy in Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions
    Ahmadzadeh, Shahab
    Shokouh-Amiri, Hosein
    Zibari, Gazi
    Wellman, Greg
    Ferguson, Jill
    Jaganmohan, Sathya
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (05) : AB354 - AB355
  • [49] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with immediate cytology of solid pancreatic masses by endoscopists
    Hikichi, T
    Irisawa, A
    Bhutani, MS
    Takagi, T
    Shibukawa, G
    Katakura, K
    Wakatsuki, T
    Imamura, H
    Takahashi, Y
    Sato, A
    Ohara, K
    Sato, Y
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (05) : AB281 - AB281
  • [50] Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with presumed pancreatic cancer
    Chandrajit P. Raut
    Ana M. Grau
    Gregg A. Staerkel
    Madhukar Kaw
    Eric P. Tamm
    Robert A. Wolff
    Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
    Jeffrey E. Lee
    Peter W. T. Pisters
    Douglas B. Evans
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2003, 7 : 118 - 128