CFD-based investigation of NOx removal from industrial waste gas by selective catalytic reduction (SCR) and selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) process using NH3

被引:0
|
作者
Bose, Debanik [1 ]
Ghanta, Kartik C. [1 ]
Hens, Abhiram [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol Durgapur, Dept Chem Engn, Durgapur 713209, India
关键词
numerical modeling; NOx removal; selective catalytic reduction; selective non catalytic reduction; SUPPORTED VANADIA; NITROGEN-OXIDES; PERSPECTIVE; COMBUSTION; ABATEMENT; AMMONIA;
D O I
10.1515/ijcre-2024-0033
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The present study conducts a comparative analysis between selective catalytic reduction (SCR) using a Cu-zeolite catalyst and selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) for the removal of NO x from industrial waste gas. The primary objective of this investigation is to computationally explore the removal of NO x using NH3 at various reactor conditions, along with the study of different hydrodynamic aspects. The study revealed the impact of different porosity of the catalyst (in SCR) and the number of baffles (in SNCR) on the reaction and fluid flow profile. Distinct geometries were employed to model each process, incorporating a turbulent model and kinetic parameters with an eddy-dissipation model (EDM) for simulations. Analyzing the effect of the NH3/NO ratio on NO conversion efficiency is a crucial component of the study. With diminishing efficiency at higher ratios, the SCR process demonstrated nearly complete NO conversion at a certain NH3/NO ratio, and this value changes with the inlet gas temperature. In contrast, SNCR produced less favorable conversion rates than SCR, indicating that the amount of NH3 supply affects conversion efficiency. At the SCR system's optimum NH3/NO ratio, SNCR achieved an 83 % conversion, and the conversion rate remained relatively constant as the ratio was increased. The results highlight the various possibilities for optimization of the reactor systems in terms of efficiency and economic feasibility.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The catalytic performance of Mn/TiWOx catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3
    Chen, Qi-lin
    Guo, Rui-tang
    Wang, Qing-shan
    Pan, Wei-guo
    Wang, Wen-huan
    Yang, Ning-zhi
    Lu, Chen-zi
    Wang, Shu-xian
    FUEL, 2016, 181 : 852 - 858
  • [22] Diesel Soot Catalyzes the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx with NH3
    Max Mehring
    Martin Elsener
    Oliver Kröcher
    Topics in Catalysis, 2013, 56 : 440 - 445
  • [24] Diesel Soot Catalyzes the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx with NH3
    Mehring, Max
    Elsener, Martin
    Kroecher, Oliver
    TOPICS IN CATALYSIS, 2013, 56 (1-8) : 440 - 445
  • [25] Vanadium oxide nanotubes for selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3
    Mousavi, Seyed Mahdi
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 24 (07) : 914 - 919
  • [26] Catalysts for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 at low temperature
    Shan, Wenpo
    Song, Hua
    CATALYSIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 5 (09) : 4280 - 4288
  • [27] Mechanistic Investigation into the Effect of Sulfuration on the FeW Catalysts for the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx with NH3
    Wang, Hui
    Qu, Zhenping
    Dong, Shicheng
    Tang, Chen
    ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES, 2017, 9 (08) : 7017 - 7028
  • [28] Influences of flue gas components and additives on NO reduction in the selective non-catalytic reduction process
    Hao, Jiangtao
    Yu, Wei
    Lu, Ping
    Xu, Senrong
    Wu, Jiayi
    Sun, Tong
    Yin, Xinyi
    Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 2015, 35 (12): : 3054 - 3060
  • [29] Reaction Pathways and Kinetics for Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) of Acidic NOx Emissions from Power Plants with NH3
    Zhu, Minghui
    Lai, Jun-Kun
    Tumuluri, Uma
    Ford, Michael E.
    Wu, Zili
    Wachs, Israel E.
    ACS CATALYSIS, 2017, 7 (12): : 8358 - 8361
  • [30] Selective catalytic reduction of NOx by NH3 in an adiabatic reverse flow reactor
    Kovács, J
    Egyházy, T
    AIR POLLUTION VI, 1998, 6 : 755 - 764