Cramer-Rao Lower Bound Analysis for Elliptic Localization With Random Sensor Placements

被引:1
|
作者
He, Jiajun [1 ]
Ho, Dominic K. C. [2 ]
Xiong, Wenxin [3 ]
So, Hing Cheung [1 ]
Chun, Young Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Elect Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Missouri, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[3] Univ Freiburg, Dept Comp Sci, D-79110 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
Location awareness; Wireless sensor networks; Radar; Aerospace and electronic systems; Vectors; Meters; Graphical models; Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB); elliptic localization (EL); random sensor placement; time sum of arrival (TSOA); PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1109/TAES.2024.3370890
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Elliptic localization (EL) based on time-sum-of-arrival (TSOA) measurements has become popular due to its widespread applications in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) and distributed radar systems. While the performance limit of EL characterized by the Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) has been thoroughly studied in literature when the sensor [transmitter and receiver (Rx)] positions are modeled as fixed deterministic quantities, the bound in the random network scenario has not been studied. This article introduces a methodology to investigate the TSOA-based localization performance, for the scenario where the sensors are randomly placed having their positions modeled by random parameters with their probability density functions specified. A tractable expression of the metric that approximates the CRLB and its distribution is analytically derived to characterize the fundamental limits of TSOA-based localization, which can be applied to both conventional WSNs and the special case in which the Rxs forma uniform linear array. Simulation results validate the theoretical development and demonstrate how the performance of EL is affected by the randomness of the sensor positions and different network parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:5587 / 5595
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cramer-Rao lower bound for tracking multiple targets
    Ristic, B
    Farina, A
    Hernandez, M
    IEE PROCEEDINGS-RADAR SONAR AND NAVIGATION, 2004, 151 (03) : 129 - 134
  • [32] Cramer-Rao lower bound-based observable degree analysis
    Quanbo GE
    Tianxiang CHEN
    Hongli HE
    Zhentao HU
    ScienceChina(InformationSciences), 2019, 62 (05) : 29 - 31
  • [33] A CRAMER-RAO LOWER-BOUND FOR COMPLEX PARAMETERS
    VANDENBOS, A
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1994, 42 (10) : 2859 - 2859
  • [34] Cramer-Rao lower bound for harmonic and subharmonic estimation
    Chen, Zhili
    Nowrouzian, Behrouz
    Zarowski, Christopher J.
    2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vols 1-13, 2006, : 2532 - 2535
  • [35] The Cramer-Rao Lower Bound in the Phase Retrieval Problem
    Balan, Radu
    Bekkerman, David
    2019 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SAMPLING THEORY AND APPLICATIONS (SAMPTA), 2019,
  • [36] A generalized Cramer-Rao lower bound for moving arrays
    Sullivan, Edmund J.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2009, 125 (02): : EL51 - EL57
  • [37] Decreasing Cramer-Rao lower bound by preprocessing steps
    Khorasani, Sara Monem
    Hodtani, Ghosheh Abed
    Kakhki, Mohammad Molavi
    SIGNAL IMAGE AND VIDEO PROCESSING, 2020, 14 (04) : 781 - 789
  • [38] ON THE CRAMER-RAO LOWER BOUND UNDER MODEL MISMATCH
    Fritsche, Carsten
    Orguner, Umut
    Ozkan, Emre
    Gustafsson, Fredrik
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2015, : 3986 - 3990
  • [39] Effects of the cycles in record on the Cramer-Rao lower bound
    Huang Q.
    Tan Z.-H.
    Tiedao Xuebao/Journal of the China Railway Society, 2010, 32 (01): : 114 - 117
  • [40] Notes on the Tightness of the Hybrid Cramer-Rao Lower Bound
    Noam, Yair
    Messer, Hagit
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2009, 57 (06) : 2074 - 2084