Generating interpretable rainfall-runoff models automatically from data

被引:1
|
作者
Dantzer, Travis Adrian [1 ]
Kerkez, Branko [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Civil & Environm Engn, 2350 Hayward St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Model discovery; Rainfall-Runoff; Dynamical systems; Explainable AI; Surrogate modeling; Data-driven; UNIT HYDROGRAPHS; HYDRAULIC DATA; DATA SET; EQUATIONS; CALIBRATION; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.advwatres.2024.104796
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
A sudden surge of data has created new challenges in water management, spanning quality control, assimilation, and analysis. Few approaches are available to integrate growing volumes of data into interpretable results. Process-based hydrologic models have not been designed to consume large amounts of data. Alternatively, new machine learning tools can automate data analysis and forecasting, but their lack of interpretability and reliance on very large data sets limits the discovery of insights and may impact trust. To address this gap, we present a new approach, which seeks to strike a middle ground between process-, and data-based modeling. The contribution of this work is an automated and scalable methodology that discovers differential equations and latent state estimations within hydrologic systems using only rainfall and runoff measurements. We show how this enables automated tools to learn interpretable models of 6 to 18 parameters solely from measurements. We apply this approach to nearly 400 stream gaging sites across the US, showing how complex catchment dynamics can be reconstructed solely from rainfall and runoff measurements. We also show how the approach discovers surrogate models that can replicate the dynamics of a much more complex process-based model, but at a fraction of the computational complexity. We discuss how the resulting representation of watershed dynamics provides insight and computational efficiency to enable automated predictions across large sensor networks.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sensitivity of monthly rainfall-runoff models to input errors and data length
    Xu, C.-Y.
    Vandewiele, G.L.
    Hydrological Sciences Journal, 1994, 39 (02) : 157 - 176
  • [23] EVALUATION OF RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS FOR MEDITERRANEAN SUBCATCHMENTS
    Cilek, A.
    Berberoglu, S.
    Donmez, C.
    XXIII ISPRS CONGRESS, COMMISSION VIII, 2016, 41 (B8): : 321 - 325
  • [24] SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF DISTRIBUTED RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS
    Soria, Freddy
    Kazama, So
    Sawamoto, Masaki
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES AND HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-6, 2009, : 24 - +
  • [25] CALIBRATION OF CONCEPTUAL MODELS FOR RAINFALL-RUNOFF SIMULATION
    JAIN, SK
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 1993, 38 (05): : 431 - 441
  • [26] Automatic calibration of Conceptual rainfall-runoff models
    Zhang, Chao
    Sun, Ying-ying
    PROGRESS IN INDUSTRIAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING II, PTS 1-4, 2013, 405-408 : 2185 - +
  • [27] Parameter estimation in stochastic rainfall-runoff models
    Jonsdottir, Harpa
    Madsen, Henrik
    Palsson, Olafur Petur
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2006, 326 (1-4) : 379 - 393
  • [28] Identification of rainfall-runoff models for operational applications
    Wagener, T
    McIntyre, N
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2005, 50 (05): : 735 - 751
  • [29] Artificial neural networks as rainfall-runoff models
    Minns, AW
    Hall, MJ
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 1996, 41 (03): : 399 - 417
  • [30] Representation of natural heterogeneity in rainfall-runoff models
    Diermanse, FLM
    PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH PART B-HYDROLOGY OCEANS AND ATMOSPHERE, 1999, 24 (07): : 787 - 792