Who, What, Where, and How? The State of Family Science in Pediatric Palliative Care

被引:0
|
作者
Broden, Elizabeth G. [1 ,2 ]
Boyden, Jackelyn Y. [3 ,4 ]
Keller, Susan [5 ]
James, Richard [6 ]
Mooney-Doyle, Kim [7 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Yale Natl Clinician Scholars Program, New Haven, CT USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Nursing, Dept Family & Community Hlth, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Div Gen Pediat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Childrens Natl Hosp, Res Lib, Washington, DC USA
[6] Nemours Childrens Hlth, Wilmington, DE USA
[7] Univ Maryland, Sch Nursing, Dept Family & Community Hlth, Fontan Outcomes Network, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Family impact; family science; pediatric palliative care; pediatric serious illness; scoping review; parents; siblings; LIFE-THREATENING ILLNESS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PARENTAL CAREGIVERS; CHILDREN; IMPACT; CANCER; EXPERIENCES; HEALTH; PERSPECTIVES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.06.022
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. Families are vital providers and recipients of pediatric palliative care (PPC) services. Understanding the scope and nature of evidence at the intersection of family science and PPC research is necessary to develop family-focused interventions that enhance child and family health. Objectives. Explore and describe the family-level impact of pediatric serious illness. Methods. We conducted a librarian-assisted scoping review using Arskey and O'Malley's approach. We searched PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases for empirical publications from 2016 to 2021 that focused on families navigating serious pediatric illness published in English. Two reviewers assessed eligibility, with discrepancies resolved by a third. We used Covidence and REDCap for data management and extraction. Results. We screened 10,983 abstracts; 309 abstracts were included in full text screening. The final group of 52 citations was analyzed by the entire team. Most research was conducted in Western Europe and North America. The perspectives of parents of children with cancer were most frequently described; voices of seriously ill youth and their siblings were less often presented. Most of the research was descriptive qualitative, followed by descriptive quantitative. Few studies were mixed methods, inferential, or interpretive. Studies most often described parent, youth, and family experience with illness and less often explored family processes and relationships. Irrespective of the approach (i.e., qualitative, quantitative), few studies focused on families as the analytic unit or used family-level analysis techniques. Study participants were usually from local dominant populations and less often from historically marginalized communities. Conclusion. The robust, descriptive, and individual-level evidence describing family impact of serious pediatric illness provides a solid foundation for future research priorities. Stronger integration of family techniques and diverse family voices in pediatric palliative care research can clarify family processes, illuminate structural barriers, and inform interventions that are responsive to family needs. These steps will enhance the education, policy, and clinical provision of PPC to all who would benefit, thereby advancing health equity for children living with serious illness and their families. (c) 2024 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:e254 / e279
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN, AND HOW
    MINDEL, JS
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1982, 14 (01): : 10 - 10
  • [22] Clusters: Who, What, Where, How?
    Birnbaum, Marvin L.
    [J]. PREHOSPITAL AND DISASTER MEDICINE, 2010, 25 (05) : 385 - 386
  • [23] Who to do what, how and where?
    Haraldsson, Prostur
    [J]. LAEKNABLADID, 2017, 103 (7-8): : 336 - 339
  • [24] The Who, When, Why, & How of Pediatric Palliative Care Referrals: A Scoping Review
    Carney, Katherine Bernier
    Goodrich, George
    Kiza, Alfred
    Hinderer, Katie
    Cong, Xiaomei
    [J]. NURSING RESEARCH, 2022, 71 (03) : S32 - S32
  • [25] Economics of Palliative Care: How Can We Advance the State of the Science?
    Starks, Helene
    Barnato, Amber E.
    Nguyen, Huong Q.
    Schenker, Yael
    Brody, Abraham A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2020, 60 (01) : 245 - 245
  • [26] Family-Centered Pediatric Nursing Care: State of the Science
    Harrison, Tondi M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING-NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, 2010, 25 (05): : 335 - 343
  • [27] Understanding Pediatric Palliative Care: What It Is and What It Should Be
    O'Shea, Eileen R.
    Kanarek, Robin Bennett
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2013, 30 (01) : 34 - 44
  • [28] Science salaries: Who makes what where
    Kreeger, KY
    [J]. SCIENTIST, 1999, 13 (24): : 32 - 33
  • [29] HOW TO COUNT WHAT IN PALLIATIVE CARE
    OCONNOR, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 1995, 11 (03) : 67 - 67
  • [30] The Continuing Evolution of a Science for Students With Behavioral Disorders: Who, What, When, Where, and How
    Scott, Terrance M.
    Burt, Jonathan L.
    [J]. RURAL SPECIAL EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 2018, 37 (03) : 132 - 139