Neural operators for robust output regulation of hyperbolic PDEs

被引:1
|
作者
Xiao, Yu [1 ]
Yuan, Yuan [2 ]
Luo, Biao [1 ]
Xu, Xiaodong [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Automat, Changsha 410083, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Changsha Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Elect & Informat Engn, Changsha 410205, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Hyperbolic PDE systems; Robust output regulation; DeepONet; Neural operator; Learning-based control; LEARNING NONLINEAR OPERATORS; UNIVERSAL APPROXIMATION; FEEDBACK REGULATORS; BACKSTEPPING DESIGN; NETWORK; STABILIZATION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106620
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The recently introduced neural operator (NO) has been employed as a gain approximator in the backstepping stabilization control of first-order hyperbolic and parabolic partial differential equation (PDE) systems. Due to the global approximation ability of the DeepONet, the NO provides approximate spatial gain function with arbitrary accuracy. The closed-loop system stability can be ensured by the backstepping controller involving the approximate gain with sufficiently small error. In this paper, the NO theory is leveraged to solve the robust output regulation problem for a class of uncertain hyperbolic PDE systems under the design framework of backstepping-based regulator. The NO is trained offline on a dataset containing a sufficient number of system parameters and corresponding prior solutions of the kernel equation, so as to generate feedback gain for the robust regulator. Once the NO is trained, the kernel equation does not need to be solved ever again, for any new system parameters that do not exceed the range of the training set. Based on the internal model principle, the regulator is inherently robust to a degree of parameter uncertainty and error in approximate gain. Therefore, the tracking error can still converge to 0 if the extended regulator equations are solvable and the parameter uncertainty leads to an asymptotically stable origin. We provide a series of theory proofs and a numerical test under the approximate control and observation gains to demonstrate the robust regulation problem. It is shown that the NO is almost three orders of magnitude faster than PDE solver in generating kernel function, and the loss remains on the order of 10 -4 in the test. This provides an opportunity to use the NO methodology for accelerated gain scheduling regulation for PDEs with time-varying system parameters.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A New Controller Structure for Robust Output Regulation
    Paunonen, Lassi
    Pohjolainen, Seppo
    2014 IEEE 53RD ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2014, : 4721 - 4726
  • [42] Semiglobal robust output regulation with generalized immersion
    Zhang, Zhen
    Serrani, Andrea
    2008 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-12, 2008, : 375 - +
  • [43] Adaptive robust output regulation control design
    Afshar, Sepideh
    Paunonen, Lassi
    2019 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2019, : 3038 - 3043
  • [44] Robust output regulation of the general nonlinear systems
    Beijing Univ of Aeronautics and, Astronautics, Beijing, China
    Beijing Hangkong Hangtian Daxue Xuebao, 5 (540-544):
  • [45] Robust output regulation for autonomous vertical landing
    Marconi, L
    Isidori, S
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 39TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-5, 2000, : 3590 - 3595
  • [46] Periodic output regulation for general linear heterodirectional hyperbolic systems
    Deutscher, Joachim
    Gabriel, Jakob
    AUTOMATICA, 2019, 103 : 208 - 216
  • [47] Adaptive Fault Estimation for Hyperbolic PDEs
    Yuan, Yuan
    Xu, Xiaodong
    Dubljevic, Stevan
    MATHEMATICS, 2021, 9 (14)
  • [48] Adaptive wavelet methods for hyperbolic PDEs
    Uppsala Univ, Uppsala, Sweden
    Journal of Scientific Computing, 1998, 13 (01): : 19 - 49
  • [49] System Gramians Evaluation for Hyperbolic PDEs
    Perev, Kamen L.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2022, 55 (34): : 96 - 101
  • [50] FAST SINGULAR LIMITS OF HYPERBOLIC PDES
    SCHOCHET, S
    JOURNAL OF DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS, 1994, 114 (02) : 476 - 512