Persuasion in veto bargaining

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Jenny S. [1 ]
Kim, Kyungmin [2 ]
Van Weelden, Richard [3 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] Emory Univ, Dept Econ, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Econ, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
RESOURCE-ALLOCATION; CHEAP TALK; INFORMATION; DISCLOSURE; AGENDAS;
D O I
10.1111/ajps.12914
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
We consider the classic veto bargaining model but allow the agenda setter to engage in persuasion to convince the veto player to approve her proposal. We show that the proposer-optimal can be achieved either by providing no information or with a simple binary experiment. Proposer chooses to reveal partial information when there is sufficient expected misalignment with Vetoer. In this case, the opportunity to engage in persuasion strictly benefits Proposer and increases the scope to exercise agenda power. We discuss applications and how the optimal experiment can be implemented in practice.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THE IMBALANCE OF POWER AND THE PRESIDENTIAL VETO - A CASE FOR THE ITEM VETO
    KRASNOW, DM
    HARVARD JOURNAL OF LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY, 1991, 14 (02): : 583 - 613
  • [42] The Miami veto
    不详
    NATION, 2000, 270 (16) : 4 - 5
  • [43] Freedom to veto
    Marlies Ahlert
    Arwed Crüger
    Social Choice and Welfare, 2004, 22 : 7 - 16
  • [44] The power of the veto
    不详
    ADVANCED MATERIALS & PROCESSES, 2000, : H8 - H8
  • [45] Responsibility Not to Veto
    Zagar, Marina
    NEW LAW: SUGGESTIONS FOR REFORMS AND IMPROVEMENTS OF EXISTING LEGAL NORMS AND PRINCIPLES, 2018, : 275 - 288
  • [46] Vatican veto
    不详
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2006, 191 (2560) : 5 - 5
  • [47] Precedential veto
    Savage, DG
    ABA JOURNAL, 2003, 89 : 26 - +
  • [48] The veto of senate
    Barrero Ortega, Abraham
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE DERECHO CONSTITUCIONAL, 2009, 29 (85): : 383 - 391
  • [49] Freedom to veto
    Ahlert, M
    Crüger, A
    SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2004, 22 (01) : 7 - 16
  • [50] The Northern Veto
    Oliver, Thomas
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT STUDIES, 2011, 37 (02) : 248 - 249