Evaluation of Mass Drug Administration Coverage for Lymphatic Filariasis in the Lukonga Health Zone in 2022

被引:0
|
作者
Ntumba, Patrick N. [1 ]
Akilimali, Pierre Z. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kinshasa, Kinshasa Sch Publ Hlth, POB 11850, Kinshasa, DEM REP CONGO
[2] Univ Kinshasa, Kinshasa Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Nutr, POB 11850, Kinshasa, DEM REP CONGO
[3] Univ Kinshasa, Patrick Kayembe Res Ctr, Kinshasa Sch Publ Hlth, POB 11850, Kinshasa, DEM REP CONGO
关键词
lymphatic filariasis; therapeutic coverage; supervised treatment; mass treatment; preventive chemotherapy;
D O I
10.3390/tropicalmed9070156
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
(1) Background and rationale: To validate the reported therapeutic coverage, a lymphatic filariasis post-mass drug administration (MDA) campaign survey was conducted in the Lukonga health zone from 10 June to 15 July 2023. (2) Materials and methods: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study conducted at the community level in 30 villages in the Lukonga health zone from 10 June to 15 July 2023. The study population included all individuals from the visited communities. The study variables included age, sex, drug use (ivermectin + albendazole), adverse events, and adherence to MDA guidelines for supervised drug use. Questionnaires were administered on Android phones using the SurveyCTO platform. Stata version 17 was used for data analysis. (3) Results: Of the 1092 respondents, 54.8% were female and one-third were between the ages of 5 and 14. Two-thirds of the households surveyed, or 64%, had more than six people living in them, and 1031 individuals, or 94%, reported being present during the community mass drug distribution. Notably, 678 individuals, or 66%, reported taking the drugs offered, and 66.4% of those who took the drugs reported doing so in the presence of drug distributors. Thus, the survey coverage was 65.7% [95% CI: 62.9-68.7]. The results of this study show that the survey coverage was above the 65% threshold recommended by the WHO but below the 82.3% reported by the Lukonga health zone. The main reason for non-compliance was a fear of ivermectin-related side effects (47%). Supervised or directly observed treatment was not adhered to (66.4%). (4) Discussion and conclusions: Key challenges to further increase treatment coverage include assessing data quality, building capacity, motivating drug distributors, improving data reporting tools, proper recording by drug distributors, and accurate reporting on non-residents who take the drugs during the MDA. In addition, harmonization of the numerator for calculating drug coverage in the health zone is critical. It is imperative to provide the public with explicit information regarding the objective of drug distribution and the probable adverse effects.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] National Mass Drug Administration Costs for Lymphatic Filariasis Elimination
    Goldman, Ann S.
    Guisinger, Victoria H.
    Aikins, Moses
    Amarillo, Maria Lourdes E.
    Belizario, Vicente Y.
    Garshong, Bertha
    Gyapong, John
    Kabali, Conrad
    Kamal, Hussein A.
    Kanjilal, Sanjat
    Kyelem, Dominique
    Lizardo, Jefrey
    Malecela, Mwele
    Mubyazi, Godfrey
    Nitiema, P. Abdoulaye
    Ramzy, Reda M. R.
    Streit, Thomas G.
    Wallace, Aaron
    Brady, Molly A.
    Rheingans, Richard
    Ottesen, Eric A.
    Haddix, Anne C.
    PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES, 2007, 1 (01):
  • [22] Mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis elimination in a coastal state of India: a study on barriers to coverage and compliance
    Hussain, Mohammad A.
    Sitha, Ashok K.
    Swain, Subhashisa
    Kadam, Shridhar
    Pati, Sanghamitra
    INFECTIOUS DISEASES OF POVERTY, 2014, 3
  • [23] Mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis elimination in a coastal state of India: a study on barriers to coverage and compliance
    Mohammad A Hussain
    Ashok K Sitha
    Subhashisa Swain
    Shridhar Kadam
    Sanghamitra Pati
    Infectious Diseases of Poverty, 3
  • [24] COMPARISON OF LYMPHATIC FILARIASIS MASS DRUG ADMINISTRATION COVERAGE IN COASTAL REGION OF KENYA, 2016-2017
    Matendechero, Sultani
    Stephen, Mwatha
    Jeremiah, Ngugi
    Omondi, Wyckliff
    Wandera, Cecilia
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2018, 99 (04): : 170 - 170
  • [25] Mass drug administration to eliminate lymphatic filariasis in Southern India
    Pattanshetty, Sanjay
    Kumar, Ashwini
    Kumar, Ravi
    Rao, Chythra R.
    Badiger, Sanjeev
    Rashmi, R.
    Kamath, Sneha
    AUSTRALASIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 3 (13): : 847 - 850
  • [26] Impact of mass drug administration for elimination of lymphatic filariasis in Nepal
    Ojha, Chet Raj
    Joshi, Basant
    Prakash, Khagendra K. C.
    Dumre, Shyam Prakash
    Yogi, Keshav Kumar
    Bhatta, Bandana
    Adhikari, Tulasi
    Crowley, Kathryn
    Marasini, Babu Ram
    PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES, 2017, 11 (07):
  • [27] Mass drug administration for elimination of lymphatic filariasis: a discussion response
    Wiwanitkit, Somsri
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    JOURNAL OF VECTOR BORNE DISEASES, 2011, 48 (03) : 182 - 182
  • [28] Elimination of lymphatic filariasis: current perspectives on mass drug administration
    Gyapong, John O.
    Owusu, Irene O.
    Vroom, Frances B. da-Costa
    Mensah, Ernest O.
    Gyapong, Margaret
    RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN TROPICAL MEDICINE, 2018, 9 : 25 - 33
  • [29] Coverage of, and compliance with, mass drug administration under the programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis in India: a systematic review
    Babu, Bontha V.
    Babu, Gopalan R.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2014, 108 (09) : 538 - 549
  • [30] Coverage survey for assessing mass drug administration against lymphatic filariasis in Gulbarga district, Karnataka, India
    Ranganath, B. G.
    JOURNAL OF VECTOR BORNE DISEASES, 2010, 47 (01) : 61 - 64