Precision HER2: a comprehensive AI system for accurate and consistent evaluation of HER2 expression in invasive breast Cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Xiong, Zhongtang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Kai [4 ]
Liu, Shaoyan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Feng, Jiahao [4 ]
Wang, Jin [4 ]
Feng, Zewen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lai, Boan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Qingxin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jiang, Qingping [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Wei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Pathol, 63 Duobao Rd, Guangzhou 510150, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Major Obstet Dis, 63 Duobao Rd, Guangzhou 510150, Peoples R China
[3] Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Guangdong Prov Clin Res Ctr Obstet & Gynecol, 63 Duobao Rd, Guangzhou 510150, Peoples R China
[4] Cells Vis Guangzhou Med Technol Inc, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
HER2; Breast cancer; Artificial intelligence; DCIS; ADCs; ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATE; TRASTUZUMAB; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; STATISTICS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-024-12980-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundWith the development of novel anti-HER2 targeted drugs, such as ADCs, it has become increasingly important to accurately interpret HER2 expression in breast cancer. Previous studies have demonstrated high intra-observer and inter-observer variabilities in evaluating HER2 staining by human eyes. There exists a strong requirement to develop artificial intelligence (AI) systems to achieve high-precision HER2 expression scoring for better clinical therapy.MethodsIn the present study, we collected breast cancer tissue samples and stained consecutive sections with anti-Calponin and anti-HER2 antibodies. High-quality digital images were selected from immunohistochemical slides and interpreted as HER2 3+, 2+, 1+, and 0. AI models were trained and assessed using annotated training and testing sets. The AI model was trained to automatically identify ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) by Calponin staining and myoepithelial annotation and filter out DCIS components in HER2-stained slides using image-overlapping techniques. Furthermore, we organized two-phase validation studies. In phase one, pathologists interpreted 112 HER2 whole-slide images (WSIs) without AI assistance, whereas in phase two, pathologists read the same slides using the AI system after a washing period of 2 weeks.ResultsOur AI model greatly improved the accuracy of reading (0.902 vs. 0.710). The number of HER2 1 + patients misdiagnosed as HER2 0 was significantly reduced (32/279 vs. 65/279), and they benefitted from ADC drugs. In addition, the AI algorithm improved the intra-group consistency of HER2 readings by pathologists with different years of experience (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.872-0.926 vs. 0.818-0.908), with the improvement most pronounced among junior pathologists (0.885 vs. 0.818).ConclusionsWe proposed a high-precision AI system to identify and filter out DCIS components and automatically evaluate HER2 expression in invasive breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Consistent absence of HER2 expression, regardless of HER2 amplification status, in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the stomach
    Ishida, Michihiro
    Sekine, Shigeki
    Taniguchi, Hirokazu
    Fukagawa, Takeo
    Katai, Hitoshi
    Kushima, Ryoji
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2014, 64 (07) : 1027 - 1031
  • [42] Evaluating Low HER2 Status in Breast Cancer Cases with Absent and Low HER2 Protein Expression
    Ardor, Gokce
    Komforti, Miglena
    Hanna, Helena
    Nassar, Aziza
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2023, 103 (03) : S94 - S95
  • [43] Is HER2 ultra-low breast cancer different from HER2 null or HER2 low breast cancer? A study of 1363 patients
    Chen, Zhaoxu
    Jia, Huiqing
    Zhang, Huina
    Chen, Lifang
    Zhao, Peng
    Zhao, Jing
    Fu, Guangming
    Xing, Xiaoming
    Li, Yujun
    Wang, Chengqin
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2023, 202 (02) : 313 - 323
  • [44] Is HER2 ultra-low breast cancer different from HER2 null or HER2 low breast cancer? A study of 1363 patients
    Zhaoxu Chen
    Huiqing Jia
    Huina Zhang
    Lifang Chen
    Peng Zhao
    Jing Zhao
    Guangming Fu
    Xiaoming Xing
    Yujun Li
    Chengqin Wang
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2023, 202 : 313 - 323
  • [45] Correlation of HER2 gene and chromosome 17 status with pathologic factors in her2 2+ invasive breast cancer
    MacGrogan, G.
    Chibon, F.
    de Mascarel, I.
    Sierankowski, G.
    Brouste, V.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2007, 20 : 40A - 40A
  • [46] Tumoral heterogeneity and HER2 status in invasive breast cancer
    Asselah, J.
    Cottu, P.
    Vincent-Salomon, A.
    Dieras, V
    Mignot, L.
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2007, 94 (06) : 568 - 568
  • [47] HER2 or not HER2: That is the question
    Burstein, HJ
    Winer, EP
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (16) : 3656 - 3659
  • [48] Comparison of HER2 expression status between conventional HER2 test and VENTANA HER2 (4B5) of metastatic breast cancer
    Tokudome, N.
    Sugino, T.
    Nishimura, S.
    Bekku, E.
    Hayashi, T.
    Tadokoro, Y.
    Takahashi, K.
    Nakashima, K.
    Uematsu, T.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2024, 35 : S1336 - S1337
  • [49] Correlation of HER2 gene and chromosome 17 status with pathologic factors in her2 2+ invasive breast cancer
    MacGrogan, G.
    Chibon, F.
    de Mascarel, I.
    Sierankowski, G.
    Brouste, V.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2007, 87 : 40A - 40A
  • [50] Reassessment of HER2 status in HER2 negative or HER2 unknown breast cancer patients with recurrent metastatic disease by analyzing serum HER2 and HER2 status of circulating tumor cells.
    Fehm, T.
    Lane, N.
    Solomayer, E.
    Wallwiener, D.
    Uhr, J.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2006, 100 : S40 - S40