Learning When to Treat Business Processes: Prescriptive Process Monitoring with Causal Inference and Reinforcement Learning

被引:7
|
作者
Bozorgi, Zahra Dasht [1 ]
Dumas, Marlon [2 ]
La Rosa, Marcello [1 ]
Polyvyanyy, Artem [1 ]
Shoush, Mahmoud [2 ]
Teinemaa, Irene [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Univ Tartu, Narva Mnt 18, EE-51009 Tartu, Estonia
[3] DeepMind, London, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
prescriptive process monitoring; causal inference; reinforcement learning;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-34560-9_22
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Increasing the success rate of a process, i.e. the percentage of cases that end in a positive outcome, is a recurrent process improvement goal. At runtime, there are often certain actions (a.k.a. treatments) that workers may execute to lift the probability that a case ends in a positive outcome. For example, in a loan origination process, a possible treatment is to issue multiple loan offers to increase the probability that the customer takes a loan. Each treatment has a cost. Thus, when defining policies for prescribing treatments to cases, managers need to consider the net gain of the treatments. Also, the effect of a treatment varies over time: treating a case earlier may be more effective than later in a case. This paper presents a prescriptive monitoring method that automates this decision-making task. The method combines causal inference and reinforcement learning to learn treatment policies that maximize the net gain. The method leverages a conformal prediction technique to speed up the convergence of the reinforcement learning mechanism by separating cases that are likely to end up in a positive or negative outcome, from uncertain cases. An evaluation on two real-life datasets shows that the proposed method outperforms a state-of-the-art baseline.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 380
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Neural spiking for causal inference and learning
    Lansdell, Benjamin James
    Kording, Konrad Paul
    PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2023, 19 (04)
  • [32] Machine learning for causal inference in Biostatistics
    Rose, Sherri
    Rizopoulos, Dimitris
    BIOSTATISTICS, 2020, 21 (02) : 336 - 338
  • [33] Causal Inference Gates Corticostriatal Learning
    Dorfman, Hayley M.
    Tomov, Momchil S.
    Cheung, Bernice
    Clarke, Dennis
    Gershman, Samuel J.
    Hughes, Brent L.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 41 (32): : 6892 - 6904
  • [34] Amortized Inference for Causal Structure Learning
    Lorch, Lars
    Sussex, Scott
    Rothfuss, Jonas
    Krause, Andreas
    Schoelkopf, Bernhard
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 35 (NEURIPS 2022), 2022,
  • [35] Machine learning in causal inference for epidemiology
    Moccia, Chiara
    Moirano, Giovenale
    Popovic, Maja
    Pizzi, Costanza
    Fariselli, Piero
    Richiardi, Lorenzo
    Ekstrom, Claus Thorn
    Maule, Milena
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 39 (10) : 1097 - 1108
  • [36] On the relationship of machine learning with causal inference
    Sheng-Hsuan Lin
    Mohammad Arfan Ikram
    European Journal of Epidemiology, 2020, 35 : 183 - 185
  • [37] On the relationship of machine learning with causal inference
    Lin, Sheng-Hsuan
    Ikram, Mohammad Arfan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 35 (02) : 183 - 185
  • [38] Causal Inference Meets Machine Learning
    Cui, Peng
    Shen, Zheyan
    Li, Sheng
    Yao, Liuyi
    Li, Yaliang
    Chu, Zhixuan
    Gao, Jing
    KDD '20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY & DATA MINING, 2020, : 3527 - 3528
  • [39] Prescriptive Business Process Monitoring for Recommending Next Best Actions
    Weinzierl, Sven
    Dunzer, Sebastian
    Zilker, Sandra
    Matzner, Martin
    BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT FORUM, BPM FORUM 2020, 2020, 392 : 193 - 209
  • [40] Online Reinforcement Learning by Bayesian Inference
    Xia, Zhongpu
    Zhao, Dongbin
    2015 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS (IJCNN), 2015,