Speech Quality Perception in Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness

被引:0
|
作者
Kelly, Scott [1 ]
Kuhlmey, Megan E. [1 ]
Despotidis, Meghan A. [1 ]
Alter, Isaac L. [1 ]
Hwa, Tiffany P. [2 ]
Chern, Alexander [3 ]
Lalwani, Anil K. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Vagelos Coll Phys & Surg, New York Presbyterian, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg,Irving Med Ctr, 180 Ft Washington Ave,HP8, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Dept Mech Engn, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
cochlear implant; CSQI; hearing loss; single-sided deafness; speech quality perception; MUSIC PERCEPTION; 2; EARS; IDENTIFICATION; RECOGNITION; VALIDATION; ABILITIES; FREQUENCY; APPRAISAL; PROSODY; FUSION;
D O I
10.1002/ohn.941
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective. Cochlear implant (CI) users frequently complain about speech quality perception (SQP). In patients undergoing cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness, there is concern that poor SQP from the implanted ear will negatively impact binaural (CI + normal hearing [NH]) SQP. In this study, we investigate if binaural SQP is measurably different than unimplanted NH alone. Study Design. Cross-sectional study. Setting. Tertiary care center. Methods. Fifteen unilateral CI users with NH in the contralateral ear completed the validated Columbia Speech Quality Instrument. This instrument consists of 9 audio clips rated across 14 specific speech qualities using a 10-point visual analog scale. SQP was assessed in 3 conditions: CI only, NH only, and CI + NH. Results. Median speech quality scores were worse in the CI only condition compared to the NH only (50.0 vs 72.6, P = .0003) and binaural (50.0 vs 71.0, P = .007) conditions. Median speech quality scores were not significantly different between the NH only and binaural conditions (72.6 vs 71, P = .8). Compared to NH, CI speech quality sounded less clear, less natural, and more mechanical. Conclusion. Compared to NH, SQP is poorer with a CI alone. However, in contrast to expectation, there is no significant difference between NH and binaural SQP. This suggests poorer CI speech perception does not negatively impact binaural SQP in patients undergoing cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The impact of cochlear implants on the quality of life of patients with single-sided deafness
    Roesli, M.
    Hoth, S.
    Baumann, I.
    Praetorius, M.
    Plinkert, P. K.
    HNO, 2015, 63 (03) : 182 - 188
  • [42] Duration of cochlear implant use in children with prelingual single-sided deafness is a predictor of word perception in the CI ear
    Arras, Tine
    Boudewyns, An
    Dhooge, Ingeborg
    Zarowski, Andrzej
    Philips, Birgit
    Desloovere, Christian
    Wouters, Jan
    van Wieringen, Astrid
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2024, 450
  • [43] Impact of Underlying Diagnosis on Speech and Quality of Life Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation for Single-Sided Deafness
    Hwa, Tiffany Peng
    Sturm, Joshua J.
    Losenegger, Tasher
    Owen, Abby
    Kuhlmey, Megan
    Cellum, Ilana
    Lalwani, Anil K.
    Lustig, Lawrence R.
    Golub, Justin S.
    Kim, Ana H.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2020, 41 (04) : E432 - E440
  • [44] Bilateral and Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users Compared on Speech Perception in Noise
    Dunn, Camille C.
    Noble, William
    Tyler, Richard S.
    Kordus, Monika
    Gantz, Bruce J.
    Ji, Haihong
    EAR AND HEARING, 2010, 31 (02): : 296 - 298
  • [45] Improving Auditory Perception in Pediatric Single-Sided Deafness: Use of Cochlear Implants? Direct Connection for Remote Speech Perception Rehabilitation
    Agostinelli, Anna
    Pegolo, Margherita
    Montino, Silvia
    Maritan, Francesca
    Gambalonga, Mattia
    Trevisi, Patrizia
    Brotto, Davide
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2023, 32 (01) : 52 - 58
  • [46] Interaural Time-Difference Discrimination as a Measure of Place of Stimulation for Cochlear-Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness
    Bernstein, Joshua G. W.
    Stakhovskaya, Olga A.
    Schuchman, Gerald I.
    Jensen, Kenneth K.
    Goupell, Matthew J.
    TRENDS IN HEARING, 2018, 22
  • [47] Evaluation of Speech, Spatial Perception and Hearing Quality in Unilateral, Bimodal and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users
    Erdem, Busra Kocak
    Ciprut, Ayca
    TURKISH ARCHIVES OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 57 (03) : 149 - 153
  • [48] Cochlear Implant Use Remains Consistent Over Time in Children With Single-Sided Deafness
    Ganek, Hillary V.
    Cushing, Sharon L.
    Papsin, Blake C.
    Gordon, Karen A.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2020, 41 (03): : 678 - 685
  • [49] Hearing Performance in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users After Upgrade to a Single-Unit Speech Processor
    Mertens, Griet
    Hofkens, Anouk
    Punte, Andrea Kleine
    De Bodt, Marc
    Van de Heyning, Paul
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2015, 36 (01) : 51 - 60
  • [50] Influence of listening environment on usage patterns in cochlear implant patients with single-sided deafness
    Garcia, Alejandro
    Haleem, Afash
    Chari, Divya A.
    Morse-Fortier, Charlotte
    Arenberg, Julie G.
    Lee, Daniel J.
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 24 (06) : 335 - 341