Portfolio risk and return between energy and non-energy stocks

被引:0
|
作者
Nautiyal, Neeraj [1 ]
Alrababa'a, Abdel Razzaq [2 ]
Rehman, Mobeen Ur [3 ,4 ]
Vo, Xuan Vinh [5 ,6 ]
Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh [7 ]
机构
[1] Sohar Univ, Fac Business, Sohar, Oman
[2] Yarmouk Univ, Fac Business, Irbid 21163, Jordan
[3] Keele Univ, Keele Business Sch, Keele, Staffordshire, England
[4] Univ Econ Ho Chi Minh City, Inst Business Res, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[5] Univ Econ Ho Chi Minh City, Inst Business Res, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[6] Univ Econ Ho Chi Minh City, CFVG, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[7] Saudi Econ Assoc, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Sharpe ratio; Energy stocks; Non-energy stocks; Portfolio; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; EQUITY INDEXES; MARKETS; SPILLOVER; INVESTORS; PREMIUM; PRICES; PAY; OIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31199
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This paper aims to examine the potential for portfolio returns by adding together conventional and energy stocks with varying proportions. We examine the risk and return characteristics of a portfolio comprising energy and non-energy stocks from twenty countries. The period for daily data ranges from 2nd July 1999 to 2nd July 2021. We use multiscale Sharpe and VaR ratios to examine the risk and returns behaviour of a portfolio with varying composition between energy and non-energy stocks across different investment periods. Our results highlight optimal returns for the equally weighted portfolio during normal and crisis periods except COVID-19 during which more proportion of conventional stocks is preferred. Risk estimates advocate an equally weighted portfolio for all periods however risk varies with the holding period. These results carry useful investment implications during short- and long-run holdings of conventional and energy stocks in a portfolio.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of the impact of diversification of uranium switching on the risk of its non-energy use
    Glebov, Vasily
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2019, 110 : 75 - 79
  • [32] Characterization, Classification and Assessment of Non-Energy Benefits of Energy Efficiency Measures
    Krutwig, Michael C.
    Starosta, Kejo D.
    VISION 2020: SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, AND GLOBAL GROWTH, VOLS I-IX, 2017, 2017, : 2697 - 2707
  • [33] Heterogeneous Responses of Energy and Non-Energy Assets to Crises in Commodity Markets
    Vortelinos, Dimitrios
    Menegaki, Angeliki
    Passas, Ioannis
    Garefalakis, Alexandros
    Viskadouros, Georgios
    Energies, 2024, 17 (21)
  • [34] Parenteral nutritional treatment - Energy and non-energy impact of carbohydrates and fats
    Schricker, T
    Geisser, W
    Georgieff, M
    ANAESTHESIST, 1997, 46 (05): : 371 - 384
  • [35] Return and volatility spillovers between Chinese and US clean energy related stocks
    Janda, Karel
    Kristoufek, Ladislav
    Zhang, Binyi
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 108
  • [36] WHY PORTFOLIO STRATEGISTS ARE LUKEWARM ABOUT ENERGY STOCKS
    JANSSON, S
    INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR, 1983, 17 (07): : 179 - &
  • [37] Time lag dependence, cross-correlation and risk analysis of US energy and non-energy stock portfolios
    Hernandez J.A.
    Al Janabi M.A.M.
    Hammoudeh S.
    Nguyen D.K.
    Journal of Asset Management, 2015, 16 (7) : 467 - 483
  • [38] Making a stronger case for industrial energy efficiency by quantifying non-energy benefits
    Pye, M
    McKane, A
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2000, 28 (3-4) : 171 - 183
  • [39] Dynamic asymmetric optimal portfolio allocation between energy stocks and energy commodities: Evidence from clean energy and oil and gas companies
    Asl, Mahdi Ghaemi
    Canarella, Giorgio
    Miller, Stephen M.
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2021, 71
  • [40] The non-energy intensive manufacturing sector.: An energy analysis relating to the Netherlands
    Ramírez, CA
    Patel, M
    Blok, K
    ENERGY, 2005, 30 (05) : 749 - 767