Treatment outcomes of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in pancreatic cancer patients with malignant ascites

被引:0
|
作者
Inoue, Kanae [1 ]
Fukushi, Koh [1 ]
Yamaguchi, Shota [1 ]
Taira, Tomonao [1 ]
Shibuki, Taro [1 ,2 ]
Satake, Tomoyuki [1 ]
Watanabe, Kazuo [1 ]
Sasaki, Mitsuhito [1 ]
Imaoka, Hiroshi [1 ]
Mitsunaga, Shuichi [1 ]
Ikeda, Masafumi [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr Hosp East, Dept Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Oncol, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 2778577, Japan
[2] Natl Canc Ctr Hosp East, Dept Promot Drug & Diagnost Dev, Div Drug & Diagnost Dev Promot, Translat Res Support Off, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 2778577, Japan
关键词
Pancreatic cancer; Malignant ascites; Gemcitabine; Nab-paclitaxel; INTRAPERITONEAL PACLITAXEL; CHEMOTHERAPY; GUIDELINE; PROGNOSIS; SURVIVAL; S-1;
D O I
10.1016/j.pan.2024.03.015
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) therapy has been shown to improve the prognosis in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC); however, the efficacy and safety of GnP in PC patients with malignant ascites (MA) remains unknown. Methods: We retrospectively investigated PC patients with peritoneal dissemination who had received GnP as first-line chemotherapy at our institution between March 2015 and August 2021. The following patient data were reviewed: patient characteristics, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), adverse events (AEs), and relative dose intensity (RDI). The severity of MA was categorized based on the CT findings as grade 1 (small), grade 2 (moderate), or grade 3 (massive). Results: A total of 189 patients were included; the study endpoints were compared between patients with each ascites grade and 41 patients without MA. The MA was classified as grade 1 in 85 patients, grade 2 in 41 patients, and grade 3 in 22 patients. In the patients with MA, the median OS, PFS and ORR were 11.2 months, 5.7 months and 24.3%, respectively. The OS and PFS decreased with increasing the severity of MA; in particular, patients with grade 2 and 3 showed a poorer prognosis. There were no differences in AEs, except for anorexia, or the RDI according to the severity of MA. Conclusion: GnP showed moderate efficacy with manageable safety profile in PC patients with MA. However, PC patients with moderate to massive ascites still have a dismal prognosis, and further development of effective treatments is needed. (c) 2024 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 623
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 versus nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a multicenter, randomized, phase II study
    Jin, Min
    Liu, Hong-Li
    Xue, Jun
    Ma, Hong
    Liu, Jun-Li
    Lin, Zhen-Yu
    Wang, Jing
    Bao, Le-Qun
    Luo, Zhi-Guo
    Yu, Xiong-Jie
    Li, Shuang
    Hu, Jian-Li
    Zhang, Tao
    ONCOLOGIST, 2024,
  • [32] Multicenter retrospective study of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for elderly patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
    Ozaka, M.
    Kobayashi, S.
    Ikeda, M.
    Ueno, M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30 : 270 - 270
  • [33] Gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel combination therapy for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Sasaki, Takashi
    Kanata, Ryo
    Saito, Kei
    Yamada, Ikuhiro
    Matsuyama, Masato
    Ozaka, Masato
    Takano, Kouichi
    Sasahira, Naoki
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27
  • [34] Prognostic impact of osteosarcopenia in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel
    Takeda, Tsuyoshi
    Sasaki, Takashi
    Okamoto, Takeshi
    Ishitsuka, Takahiro
    Yamada, Manabu
    Nakagawa, Hiroki
    Mie, Takafumi
    Furukawa, Takaaki
    Kasuga, Akiyoshi
    Matsuyama, Masato
    Ozaka, Masato
    Sasahira, Naoki
    PANCREATOLOGY, 2023, 23 (03) : 275 - 282
  • [35] Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel use in metastatic pancreatic cancer: A study of 40 patients.
    Barrera, Ivan
    Filimon, Sabin Dragos
    Meng, Jassy
    Kavan, Tomas
    Rho, Young Soo
    Batist, Gerald
    Kavan, Petr
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (04)
  • [36] Comparison of treatment patterns and economic outcomes among metastatic pancreatic cancer patients initiated on nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus FOLFIRINOX
    McBride, Ali
    Bonafede, Machaon
    Cai, Qian
    Princic, Nicole
    Tran, Oth
    Pelletier, Corey
    Parisi, Monika
    Patel, Manish
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 10 (10) : 1153 - 1160
  • [37] Retrospective analysis of institutional outcomes with FOLFIRINOX versus nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Singh, Amisha
    Shroff, Rachna T.
    McBride, Ali
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (04)
  • [38] Prognostic analysis and outcomes of metastatic pancreatic cancer patients receiving nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as second or later-line treatment
    Giordano, Guido
    Milella, Michele
    Landriscina, Matteo
    Bergamo, Francesca
    Tirino, Giuseppe
    Santaniello, Antonio
    Zaniboni, Alberto
    Vasile, Enrico
    De Vita, Ferdinando
    Re, Giovanni Lo
    Vaccaro, Vanja
    Giommoni, Elisa
    Natale, Donato
    Conca, Raffaele
    Santini, Daniele
    Maiorino, Luigi
    Sanna, Gianni
    Ricci, Vincenzo
    Iop, Aldo
    Montesarchio, Vincenzo
    Procaccio, Letizia
    Noventa, Silvia
    Bianco, Roberto
    Febbraro, Antonio
    Lonardi, Sara
    Tortora, Giampaolo
    Sperduti, Isabella
    Melisi, Davide
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (12):
  • [39] nab-Paclitaxel for the treatment of pancreatic cancer
    Kim, George
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2017, 9 : 85 - 96
  • [40] A Retrospective Study of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Refractory to Gemcitabine Monotherapy
    Nishioka, Mariko
    Okano, Naohiro
    Wakabayashi, Masashi
    Ikeno, Takashi
    Hayashi, Masato
    Mizutani, Tomonori
    Nagashima, Fumio
    Furuse, Junji
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 44 (03) : 1233 - 1239