Unsupervised Hybrid Models Integrating Deep Autoencoders and Process Controllers' Models for Enhanced Process Monitoring and Fault Detection

被引:0
|
作者
Aghaee, Mohammad [1 ]
Krau, Stephane [2 ]
Tamer, Ibrahim Melih [2 ]
Budman, Hector [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Chem Engn Dept, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Sanofi, Mfg Technol, Toronto, ON M2R 3T4, Canada
关键词
TENNESSEE EASTMAN PROCESS; CLUSTERING APPROACH; DIAGNOSIS; NETWORK; STATE;
D O I
10.1021/acs.iecr.4c01980
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This paper introduces a novel hybrid process monitoring model that integrates long short-term memory autoencoders with process controllers' models. The parameters of the hybrid model are optimized by minimizing a novel loss function, which combines the mean square error (MSE) between controlled variables and their reconstructions from the LSTM-AE model, along with the MSE of manipulated variables and their reconstructions obtained with the numerically implemented and exactly a priori known controller equations. The effectiveness of the proposed method is evaluated on the benchmark of an industrial-scale penicillin process as a batch case study and the Tennessee Eastman plant process under a decentralized control strategy as a continuous case study. A comparative analysis of the proposed hybrid model with an equivalent nonhybrid LSTM-AE model, which does not utilize process controllers' equations, highlights the superiority of the proposed hybrid monitoring model in fault detection. These improvements result from the use of an LSTM-AE network with fewer parameters, thus making it less susceptible to overfitting.
引用
收藏
页码:14748 / 14760
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Stability of Controllers for Gaussian Process Forward Models
    Vinogradska, Julia
    Bischoff, Bastian
    Nguyen-Tuong, Duy
    Schmidt, Henner
    Romer, Anne
    Peters, Jan
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 48, 2016, 48
  • [22] Learning business process simulation models: A Hybrid process mining and deep learning approach✩
    Camargo, Manuel
    Baron, Daniel
    Dumas, Marlon
    Gonzalez-Rojas, Oscar
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2023, 117
  • [23] The process chemometrics approach to process monitoring and fault detection
    Wise, BM
    Gallagher, NB
    JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 1996, 6 (06) : 329 - 348
  • [24] The Semantics of Hybrid Process Models
    Slaats, Tijs
    Schunselaar, Dennis M. M.
    Maggi, Fabrizio M.
    Reijers, Hajo A.
    ON THE MOVE TO MEANINGFUL INTERNET SYSTEMS: OTM 2016 CONFERENCES, 2016, 10033 : 531 - 551
  • [25] Weak process models for robust process detection
    Jiang, GF
    SENSORS, AND COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS, AND INTELLIGENCE(C31) TECHNOLOGIES FOR HOMELAND SECURITY AND HOMELAND DEFENSE III, PTS 1 AND 2, 2004, 5403 : 102 - 112
  • [26] Subspace identification of continuous time models for process fault detection and isolation
    Li, WH
    Raghavan, H
    Shah, S
    JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2003, 13 (05) : 407 - 421
  • [27] Fault detection and diagnosis in a food pasteurization process with hidden Markov models
    Tokatli, F
    Cinar, A
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 82 (06): : 1252 - 1262
  • [28] FAULT DETECTION BASED ON GAUSSIAN PROCESS MODELS An Application to the Rolling Mill
    Juricic, Dani
    Ettler, Pavel
    Kocijan, Jus
    ICINCO 2011: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATICS IN CONTROL, AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS, VOL 1, 2011, : 437 - 440
  • [29] An unsupervised structural health monitoring framework based on Variational Autoencoders and Hidden Markov Models
    Coraca, Eduardo M.
    Ferreira, Janito, V
    Nobrega, Euripedes G. O.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2023, 231
  • [30] Advanced detection of HVAC faults using unsupervised SVM novelty detection and Gaussian process models
    Van Every, Philip Michael
    Rodriguez, Mykel
    Jones, C. Birk
    Mammoli, Andrea Alberto
    Martinez-Ramon, Manel
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2017, 149 : 216 - 224