Understanding communication and stakeholder learning process affecting sustainability in multi-stakeholder platforms: The case of a Learning Alliance in Vietnam

被引:0
|
作者
Quilloy, Reianne M. [1 ]
Flor, Rica Joy [2 ]
Flor, Benjamina Paula G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Philippines Los Banos, Coll Dev Commun, Laguna 4301, Philippines
[2] Int Rice Res Inst, Los Banos, Philippines
关键词
Multi-stakeholder platform; networks; technological change; participatory approach; Vietnam; INNOVATION NETWORKS; MANAGEMENT; FARMERS; SECTOR;
D O I
10.1177/00307270241281747
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
A Learning Alliance (LA) is a multi-stakeholder approach widely used by research organizations to provide a platform for technology or innovation adoption. It heavily relies on communication among varied and interacting stakeholders with shared interests. Thus, it is important to understand how these interactions play a role in forming and sustaining the network. Using the case of a LA in Can Tho province, Vietnam, we analyzed the communication processes generated in the interactions through document analysis of project materials, focus group discussions, key informant interviews with the LA facilitators, and observation notes from eight LA events. Findings reveal that communication underlies network development and maintenance. It facilitated the alignment of stakeholders' interest and reorganization of roles, particularly when stakeholders played an intermediary role in facilitating the LA. The network also explored inclusive strategies to upgrade the rice value chain. However, challenges arose due to communication breakdown related to the strategic positioning of the LA in the broader innovation system. Furthermore, with the network's reliance on the lifespan of bilateral projects led by research institutions, hindered its long-term success. While LA foster negotiated change and inclusivity, more reflections are needed on mechanisms for local uptake, deliberate planning, and enhancement of communication roles to support the learning processes of a LA so that the network can be intentional in pursuing desired change addressing emergent challenges.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Educating for sustainable production and consumption and sustainable livelihoods: learning from multi-stakeholder networks
    Roger A. Petry
    Zinaida Fadeeva
    Olga Fadeeva
    Helen Hasslöf
    Åsa Hellström
    Jos Hermans
    Yoko Mochizuki
    Kerstin Sonesson
    [J]. Sustainability Science, 2011, 6 : 83 - 96
  • [32] Multi-stakeholder initiatives, policy learning and institutionalization: the surprising failure of open government in Norway
    Wilson, Christopher
    [J]. POLICY STUDIES, 2021, 42 (02) : 173 - 192
  • [33] Polycentric governance of commons through multi-stakeholder platforms: insights from two case studies in India
    Eldidi, Hagar
    Rawat, Shivanyaa
    Meinzen-Dick, Ruth
    Chaturvedi, Rahul
    Sanil, Richu
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [34] Multi-stakeholder assessment of forest sustainability: Multi-criteria analysis and the case of the Ontario forest assessment system
    Mendoza, GA
    Dalton, WJ
    [J]. FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 2005, 81 (02): : 222 - 228
  • [35] Learning environments for multi-stakeholder participation in water management: Visual Problem Appraisal Citarum River
    Fliervoet, Jan
    Witteveen, Loes
    Roosmini, Dwina
    Geerling, Gertjan
    Nastiti, Anindrya
    Mansoor, Alvanov Z.
    [J]. 7TH ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, ETMC 2023, 2024, 485
  • [36] Simulation and validation of a reinforcement learning agent-based model for multi-stakeholder forest management
    Bone, Christopher
    Dragicevic, Suzana
    [J]. COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS, 2010, 34 (02) : 162 - 174
  • [37] Learning needs assessment for multi-stakeholder implementation science training in LMIC settings: findings and recommendations
    Turner, Mallory Wolfe
    Bogdewic, Stephanie
    Agha, Erum
    Blanchard, Carrie
    Sturke, Rachel
    Pettifor, Audrey
    Salisbury, Kathryn
    Marques, Andrea Horvath
    Excellent, Marie Lina
    Rajagopal, Nitya
    Ramaswamy, Rohit
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 2 (01):
  • [38] Conflict resolution in the multi-stakeholder stepped spillway design under uncertainty by machine learning techniques
    Mooselu, Mehrdad Ghorbani
    Nikoo, Mohammad Reza
    Bakhtiari, Parnian Hashempour
    Rayani, Nooshin Bakhtiari
    Izady, Azizallah
    [J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2021, 110
  • [39] Learning needs assessment for multi-stakeholder implementation science training in LMIC settings: Findings and recommendations
    Turner, Mallory
    Bogdewic, Stephanie
    Agha, Erum
    Blanchard, Carrie
    Sturke, Rachel
    Pettifor, Audrey
    Salisbury, Kathryn
    Marques, Andrea
    Ramaswamy, Rohit
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2021, 16 (SUPPL 1):
  • [40] Conflict resolution in the multi-stakeholder stepped spillway design under uncertainty by machine learning techniques
    Mooselu, Mehrdad Ghorbani
    Nikoo, Mohammad Reza
    Bakhtiari, Parnian Hashempour
    Rayani, Nooshin Bakhtiari
    Izady, Azizallah
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 110