Felt understanding in same-sex friendships and subjective well-being among emerging adults

被引:0
|
作者
Demir, Meliksah [1 ]
Ozen-Ciplak, Ayca [2 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Sacramento, Psychol Dept, 6000 J St, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA
[2] Akdeniz Univ, Psikol Bolumu, Dumlipinar Blv, Antalya, Turkiye
关键词
Felt understanding; Same-sex best friendships; Subjective well-being; Personality; Longitudinal; PARTNER RESPONSIVENESS; CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS; FEELING UNDERSTOOD; SELF-DISCLOSURE; SATISFACTION; INDIVIDUALS; PERCEPTIONS; COMMITMENT; HAPPINESS; VARIANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s12144-024-06428-0
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Feeling understood is an essential perception in close relationships and confers various intrapersonal benefits. However, it is not known if the perception of understanding in friendships is a reliable correlate and predictor of subjective well-being (SWB). Three studies (N = 790) investigated the role of felt understanding (FU) measured as global trait in SWB while taking the latter's well-established predictors at individual (e.g., personality) and relational (e.g., friendship quality) levels into account. Study 1 showed that FU was not redundant with the Big Five dimensions of personality, such that it explained additional variance in SWB. FU also accounted for unique variance in SWB while taking global evaluations of friendships (Study 2) into account. Study 3, a six-week longitudinal study, showed that FU and SWB were related at the cross-sectional level but did not predict each other longitudinally. The findings across the studies suggest that FU is a valuable and significant addition to the list of friendship experiences that are linked to SWB. The importance of assessing FU as a state vs. trait was discussed. Directions for future research that could enhance our understanding of the role of FU in SWB were also provided.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:28781 / 28796
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Emerging adults' subjective financial well-being: transition pathways and relational predictors
    Sorgente, Angela
    Lanz, Margherita
    Schiliro, Martina
    Terranova, Federica
    PSICOLOGIA SOCIALE, 2016, 11 (01) : 47 - 67
  • [32] Viewpoint: Measuring and understanding subjective well-being
    Helliwell, John F.
    Barrington-Leigh, Christopher P.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2010, 43 (03): : 729 - 753
  • [33] Subjective well-being and its correlates among adults with intellectual disabilities
    Araten-Bergman, T.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2016, 60 (7-8) : 630 - 630
  • [34] Changes in Family Roles and Subjective Well-Being among Japanese Adults
    Hara, Yuko
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY ISSUES, 2022, 43 (03) : 769 - 792
  • [35] Sexual Minority Stress and Same-Sex Relationship Well-being: A Meta-analysis of Research Prior to the US Nationwide Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage
    Cao, Hongjian
    Zhou, Nan
    Fine, Mark
    Liang, Yue
    Li, Jiayao
    Mills-Koonce, W. Roger
    JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2017, 79 (05) : 1258 - 1277
  • [36] Giftedness and subjective well-being: A study with adults
    Wirthwein, Linda
    Rost, Detlef H.
    LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2011, 21 (02) : 182 - 186
  • [37] The subjective well-being of adults born preterm
    Winstanley, Alice
    Lamb, Michael E.
    Ellis-Davies, Kate
    Rentfrow, Peter Jason
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2015, 59 : 23 - 30
  • [38] Exercise and subjective well-being in old adults
    Cruz, Maria H.
    JOURNAL OF AGING AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2012, 20 : S42 - S42
  • [39] Monogamy Agreements in Male Same-Sex Couples: Associations With Relationship Quality and Individual Well-Being
    Whitton, Sarah W.
    Weitbrecht, Eliza M.
    Kuryluk, Amanda D.
    JOURNAL OF COUPLE & RELATIONSHIP THERAPY-INNOVATIONS IN CLINICAL AND EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 14 (01): : 39 - 63
  • [40] "It may be legal, but it is not treated equally": marriage equality and well-being implications for same-sex couples
    Kennedy, Heather R.
    Dalla, Rochelle L.
    JOURNAL OF GAY & LESBIAN SOCIAL SERVICES, 2020, 32 (01) : 67 - 98