The mechanical complications and behavior of angulated dental implant abutment systems versus conventional abutments, a narrative review

被引:0
|
作者
Albakri, Ahmed [1 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Prosthet Dent Sci, POB 60169,West King Abdullah Rd, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Angulated; Angled Screw Channel; Dental Abutments; Dental Implant; Dental Prosthesis; Implant-Supported; Flexural Strength; Prosthesis Loosening; SCREW CHANNEL; CLINICAL COMPLICATIONS; FRACTURE-RESISTANCE; SUPPORTED SINGLE; BITE FORCE; RESTORATIONS; SURVIVAL; RATES; PROSTHESES; CROWNS;
D O I
10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.06.002
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Angulated screw channel (ASC) abutment allows off-axis dental implants to be used in dental restorations without the need for cementation. As this is a relatively new system, research on its clinical performance is limited. Objectives: To summarize the available in-vitro and in-vivo studies on the mechanical and technical issues associated with the ASC system and compare its clinical performance with that of conventional implantsupported abutments. Methods: A comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect databases was performed, focusing on articles about angulated (angled) screw channel (ASC) systems published in English between January 2015 and November 2023. Only in-vitro and in-vivo studies were included. Results: After analyzing the recorded articles, 26 studies (11 in vivo and 15 in vitro) were included in the final discussion and review. Conclusion: Although the ASC system is still relatively new, and is presently outperformed by conventional abutment systems in terms of technical and mechanical properties, in short- and medium-term in-vivo studies, it was shown reliable for retaining single or multiple-unit implant restorations in both posterior and anterior zones. Still, further long-term clinical research is needed to fully elucidate the risk factors associated with ASC failures.
引用
收藏
页码:1072 / 1077
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [21] Complications of Conventional Sinus Augmentation Techniques Versus Modified Osteotome Techniques in Dental Implant Surgery: A 3-Year Retrospective Clinical Study
    Vivek G.K
    Nida Reader
    Akshay Ahmed
    N. Shetty
    Mohammed Vaibhav
    Hemavathi Imran
    Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2023, 22 : 287 - 295
  • [22] Survival, complications, and patient-reported outcomes of endodontically treated teeth versus dental implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review
    Sinsareekul, Chanakarn
    Saengthong-aram, Phurit
    Limpuangthip, Nareudee
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2025, 133 (03): : 669 - 676
  • [23] Influence of different implant-abutment connection designs on the mechanical and biological behavior of single-tooth implants in the maxillary esthetic zone: A systematic review
    Vetromilla, Bruna M.
    Brondani, Lucas P.
    Pereira-Cenci, Tatiana
    Bergoli, Cesar D.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2019, 121 (03): : 398 - +
  • [24] Whole Medical Systems versus the System of Conventional Biomedicine: A Critical, Narrative Review of Similarities, Differences, and Factors That Promote the Integration Process
    Baars, Erik W.
    Hamre, Harald J.
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 2017
  • [25] The physical-mechanical properties of 3D-printed versus conventional milled zirconia for dental clinical applications: A systematic review with meta-analysis
    Alghauli, Mohammed Ahmed
    Alqutaibi, Ahmed Yaseen
    Wille, Sebastian
    Kern, Matthias
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2024, 156