Identifying Conservation Priority Areas of Hydrological Ecosystem Service Using Hot and Cold Spot Analysis at Watershed Scale

被引:0
|
作者
Gwal, Srishti [1 ]
Sena, Dipaka Ranjan [2 ]
Srivastava, Prashant K. [1 ]
Srivastava, Sanjeev K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Banaras Hindu Univ, Inst Environm & Sustainable Dev, Remote Sensing Lab, Varanasi 221005, India
[2] Int Water Management Inst IWMI, Hydrol & Water Resources Management, New Delhi 110012, India
[3] Univ Sunshine Coast, Sch Sci Technol & Engn, Sunshine Coast 4556, Australia
关键词
forest ecosystem; hydrological fluxes; Indian Himalayan Region; synergy; trade-off; UNGAUGED CATCHMENTS; RUNOFF RESPONSE; BIODIVERSITY; HOTSPOTS; FOREST; REGIONALIZATION; CONGRUENCE; GUIDELINES; LANDSCAPE; SWAT;
D O I
10.3390/rs16183409
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Hydrological Ecosystem Services (HES) are crucial components of environmental sustainability and provide indispensable benefits. The present study identifies critical hot and cold spots areas of HES in the Aglar watershed of the Indian Himalayan Region using six HES descriptors, namely water yield (WYLD), crop yield factor (CYF), sediment yield (SYLD), base flow (LATQ), surface runoff (SURFQ), and total water retention (TWR). The analysis was conducted using weightage-based approaches under two methods: (1) evaluating six HES descriptors individually and (2) grouping them into broad ecosystem service categories. Furthermore, the study assessed pixel-level uncertainties that arose because of the distinctive methods used in the identification of hot and cold spots. The associated synergies and trade-offs among HES descriptors were examined too. From method 1, 0.26% area of the watershed was classified as cold spots and 3.18% as hot spots, whereas method 2 classified 2.42% area as cold spots and 2.36% as hot spots. Pixel-level uncertainties showed that 0.57 km2 and 6.86 km2 of the watershed were consistently under cold and hot spots, respectively, using method 1, whereas method 2 identified 2.30 km2 and 6.97 km2 as cold spots and hot spots, respectively. The spatial analysis of hot spots showed consistent patterns in certain parts of the watershed, primarily in the south to southwest region, while cold spots were mainly found on the eastern side. Upon analyzing HES descriptors within broad ecosystem service categories, hot spots were mainly in the southern part, and cold spots were scattered throughout the watershed, especially in agricultural and scrubland areas. The significant synergistic relation between LATQ and WYLD, and sediment retention and WYLD and trade-offs between SURFQ and HES descriptors like WYLD, LATQ, sediment retention, and TWR was attributed to varying factors such as land use and topography impacting the water balance components in the watershed. The findings underscore the critical need for targeted conservation efforts to maintain the ecologically sensitive regions at watershed scale.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Integrating ecosystem service importance and ecological sensitivity to identify priority areas for ecological conservation and restoration in Miyun Reservoir Basin
    Zhang, Zhaokun
    Li, Tao
    Li, Ling
    Li, Shuang
    Rong, Yuejing
    Bao, Rui
    Fu, Xiao
    Tang, Mingfang
    Wu, Gang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2023, 30 (08): : 925 - 937
  • [32] Identifying priority conservation areas based on ecosystem services change driven by Natural Forest Protection Project in Qinghai province, China
    Yan, Ke
    Wang, Weifeng
    Li, Yuanhui
    Wang, Xiangfu
    Jin, Jiaxin
    Jiang, Jiang
    Yang, Hongqiang
    Wang, Liangjie
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 362
  • [33] Identifying priority conservation areas based on comprehensive consideration of biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Three-River Headwaters Region, China
    Li, Sihan
    Yu, Deyong
    Huang, Ting
    Hao, Ruifang
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 359
  • [34] Identifying high-priority conservation areas for endangered waterbirds using a flagship species in the Korean DMZ
    Kim, Jae Hyun
    Park, Shinyeong
    Kim, Seung Ho
    Lee, Eun Ju
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 159
  • [35] Identifying priority urban green areas for biodiversity conservation and equitable recreational accessibility using spatial prioritization
    Jalkanen, Joel
    Vierikko, Kati
    Kujala, Heini
    Kivisto, Ilkka
    Kohonen, Ilmari
    Lehtinen, Pauli
    Toivonen, Tuuli
    Virtanen, Elina
    Moilanen, Atte
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2025, 259
  • [36] Identifying priority conservation areas for a recovering brown bear population in Greece using citizen science data
    Bonnet-Lebrun, A-S
    Karamanlidis, A. A.
    de Gabriel Hernando, M.
    Renner, I
    Gimenez, O.
    ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2020, 23 (01) : 83 - 93
  • [37] Identifying priority areas for conservation of spadefoot toad, Pelobates fuscus insubricus using a maximum entropy approach
    Giovannini, Andrea
    Seglie, Daniele
    Giacoma, Cristina
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2014, 23 (06) : 1427 - 1439
  • [38] Analysis of Priority Conservation Areas Using Habitat Quality Models and MaxEnt Models
    Jeong, Ahmee
    Kim, Minkyung
    Lee, Sangdon
    ANIMALS, 2024, 14 (11):
  • [39] Scale-dependent complementarity of climatic velocity and environmental diversity for identifying priority areas for conservation under climate change
    Carroll, Carlos
    Roberts, David R.
    Michalak, Julia L.
    Lawler, Joshua J.
    Nielsen, Scott E.
    Stralberg, Diana
    Hamann, Andreas
    Mcrae, Brad H.
    Wang, Tongli
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2017, 23 (11) : 4508 - 4520
  • [40] Integrating biodiversity, ecosystem services and socio-economic data to identify priority areas and landowners for conservation actions at the national scale
    Di Minin, Enrico
    Soutullo, Alvaro
    Bartesaghi, Lucia
    Rios, Mariana
    Szephegyi, Maria Nube
    Moilanen, Atte
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2017, 206 : 56 - 64