In non-elite athletes, women are more likely to return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Robben, Bart J. [1 ]
Keuning, Martine C. [2 ]
Zuurmond, Rutger G. [1 ]
Stevens, Martin [2 ]
Bulstra, Sjoerd K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Isala Zwolle, Dept Orthoped Surg, POB 10400, NL-8000 GK Zwolle, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Orthoped Surg, POB 30-001, NL-8000 GK Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament; Reconstruction; Return to sport; Return to level of sports; Patient variables; Surgical variables; PSYCHOLOGICAL READINESS; COMPETITIVE SPORT; SURGERY; METAANALYSIS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-024-07834-y
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe desire to return to sports (RTS) and return to performance at preinjury level (RTSP) is a common motivator for athletes undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery. However, for non-elite athletes little is known about the patient and surgical variables influencing RTS/RTSP. Purpose was to determine which patient or surgical variables had an effect on RTS/RTSP in non-elite athletes. We also analyzed whether patients that RTS and RTSP have more confidence in the knee and less difficulty pivoting.MethodsA single-centre retrospective cohort study. All patients who had undergone primary hamstring ACL reconstruction within a 5-year period were included. Patients were asked about their pre- and postoperative sports participation using the Tegner Activity Score (TAS) as well as about their RTS/RTSP. Confidence in the knee and difficulty with pivoting were asked about. To determine the potential adverse effect of patient variables at the time of surgery (sex, age, height, weight, TAS preop) and surgical variables (graft diameter, surgical technique, concomitant injury) influencing RTS/RTSP, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used.Results370 ACL reconstructions were included. Average follow-up was 4.6 years (SD 1.4). RTS rate was 65% and RTSP 43%. Median preinjury TAS was 7 (Q1:6, Q3:8)), postoperative 6 (Q1:4, Q3:7). Multivariate analysis showed that women were more likely to RTS (OR 2.40, 1.16-4.97). A lower preinjury TAS (OR 0.80, 0.67-0.95) resulted in higher RTSP levels. None of the surgical variables had a significant influence on RTS or RTSP. Patients who returned to sports or to preinjury-level performance displayed significantly more confidence in the operated knee and less difficulty pivoting than non-returning patients.ConclusionOur study shows that 65% of non-elite athletes with an ACL reconstruction returned to sports, 43% at preinjury level. Women were over twice more likely to RTS than men. Preinjury TAS significantly influences RTSP, with a lower preinjury TAS leading to a higher percentage of RTSP. Patients returning to both scored better in their self-reported confidence in the knee and difficulty pivoting than non-returning patients.Level of evidenceRetrospective cohort III.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development of a test battery to enhance safe return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Gokeler, Alli
    Welling, Wouter
    Zaffagnini, Stefano
    Seil, Romain
    Padua, Darin
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2017, 25 (01) : 192 - 199
  • [32] Return to preinjury sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is predicted by five independent factors
    Muller, Bart
    Yabroudi, Mohammad A.
    Lynch, Andrew
    Popchak, Adam J.
    Lai, Chung-Liang
    van Dijk, C. Niek
    Fu, Freddie H.
    Irrgang, James J.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2022, 30 (01) : 84 - 92
  • [33] Factors Used to Determine Return to Unrestricted Sports Activities After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Barber-Westin, Sue D.
    Noyes, Frank R.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2011, 27 (12): : 1697 - 1705
  • [34] Return to preinjury sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is predicted by five independent factors
    Bart Muller
    Mohammad A. Yabroudi
    Andrew Lynch
    Adam J. Popchak
    Chung-Liang Lai
    C. Niek van Dijk
    Freddie H. Fu
    James J. Irrgang
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2022, 30 : 84 - 92
  • [35] Development of a test battery to enhance safe return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Alli Gokeler
    Wouter Welling
    Stefano Zaffagnini
    Romain Seil
    Darin Padua
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2017, 25 : 192 - 199
  • [36] Letter to the Editor: “Prospective study of functional outcomes and return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the knee”
    Mao-wei Chen
    Li-xuan Wang
    International Orthopaedics, 2024, 48 : 1365 - 1366
  • [37] Return to Sports After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Validity and Reliability of the SPORTS Score at 6 and 12 Months
    Bley, Jordan A.
    Master, Hiral
    Huston, Laura J.
    Block, Shannon
    Pennings, Jacquelyn S.
    Coronado, Rogelio A.
    Cox, Charles L.
    Sullivan, Jaron P.
    Dale, Kevin M.
    Saluan, Paul M.
    Spindler, Kurt P.
    Archer, Kristin R.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (06)
  • [38] REHABILITATIVE TECHNIQUES FOR ATHLETES AFTER RECONSTRUCTION OF THE ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT
    LUTZ, GE
    STUART, MJ
    SIM, FH
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1990, 65 (10) : 1322 - 1329
  • [39] No Increased Occurrence of Osteoarthritis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction After Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in Athletes
    Hoffelner, Thomas
    Resch, Herbert
    Moroder, Philipp
    Atzwanger, Joerg
    Wiplinger, Markus
    Hitzl, Wolfgang
    Tauber, Mark
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2012, 28 (04): : 517 - 525
  • [40] Return to Military Duty After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Antosh, Ivan J.
    Patzkowski, Jeanne C.
    Racusin, Adam W.
    Aden, James K.
    Waterman, Scott M.
    MILITARY MEDICINE, 2018, 183 (1-2) : E83 - E89