The Key Features of a Genetic Nondiscrimination Policy A Delphi Consensus Statement

被引:0
|
作者
Uberoi, Diya [1 ]
Dalpe, Gratien [1 ]
Cheung, Katherine [2 ]
Kondrup, Emma [1 ]
Palmour, Nicole [1 ]
Arawi, Thalia [3 ,4 ]
Arych, Mykhailo [5 ]
Aviles, Miguel A. Ramiro [6 ]
Ayuso, Carmen [7 ,8 ]
Bentzen, Heidi B. [9 ]
Blizinsky, Katherine [10 ]
Bombard, Yvonne [11 ,12 ]
Chandrasekharan, Subhashini [10 ]
Chung, Brian Hon Yin [13 ]
de Paor, Aisling [14 ]
Doerr, Megan [15 ]
Dove, Edward S. [16 ]
Dupras, Charles [17 ]
Granados-Moreno, Palmira [1 ]
Greenbaum, Dov [18 ]
Gunnarsdottir, Hrefna D. [19 ,20 ]
Haidar, Hazar [21 ]
Ho, Chih-hsing [22 ]
Jamuar, Saumya S. [23 ]
Kim, Hannah [24 ]
Lebret, Audrey [25 ]
MacDonald, Angus [26 ]
Minssen, Timo [25 ]
Nasir, Jamal [27 ]
Nicol, Dianne [28 ]
Nicolas, Pilar [29 ]
Otlowski, Margaret [28 ]
Nair, Athira P. S. [30 ]
Prince, Anya E. R. [31 ]
Rothstein, Mark [32 ]
Ryan, Rosalyn [33 ]
Sillon, Guillaume [34 ]
Singh, Kshitij K. [35 ]
Stedman, Ian [36 ]
Tiller, Jane [37 ]
Van Hoyweghen, Ine [38 ]
Zawati, Ma'n H. [1 ]
Joly, Yann [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Ctr Genom & Policy, 740 Dr Penfield Ave,Ste 5200, Montreal, PQ H3A 0G1, Canada
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Ctr Psychedel & Consciousness Res, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Amer Univ Beirut, Fac Med, Beirut, Lebanon
[4] Amer Univ Beirut, Med Ctr, Beirut, Lebanon
[5] NAS Ukraine, Inst Econ & Forecasting, Kyiv, Ukraine
[6] Univ Alcala, Dept Ciencias Jurid, Madrid, Spain
[7] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Fdn Jimenez Diaz Univ Hosp, Dept Genet, Hlth Res Inst,IIS,FJD, Madrid, Spain
[8] Inst Salud Carlos III, Ctr Biomed Network Res Rare Dis CIBERER, Madrid, Spain
[9] Univ Oslo, Ctr Med Eth, Oslo, Norway
[10] NIH, All Us Res Program, Bethesda, MD USA
[11] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[12] Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Unity Hlth Toronto, Genom Hlth Serv Res Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[13] Univ Hong Kong, Hong Kong Genome Inst, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[14] Dublin City Univ, Sch Law & Govt, Dublin, Ireland
[15] Sage Bionetworks, Seattle, WA USA
[16] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Law, Edinburgh, Scotland
[17] Univ Montreal, Dept med sociale & prevent, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[18] Yale Univ, Dept Mol Biophys Biochem, New Haven, CT USA
[19] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Law, Ctr Legal Studies Welf & Market, Copenhagen, Denmark
[20] Univ Iceland, Fac Law, Reykjavik, Iceland
[21] Univ Quebec Rimouski, Canada Dept lettres & human, Rimouski, PQ, Canada
[22] Acad Sinica, Inst European, Amer Studies, Taipei, Taiwan
[23] KK Womens & Childrens Hosp, SingHlth Duke NUS Inst Precis Med, Genet Serv, Singapore, Singapore
[24] Yonsei Univ, Grad Sch Int Studies, Seoul, South Korea
[25] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Law, Ctr Adv Studies Biosci Innovat Law CeBIL, Copenhagen, Denmark
[26] Heriot Watt Univ, Dept Actuarial Math & Stat, Edinburgh, Scotland
[27] Univ Northampton, Dept Human Genet & Genom, Northampton, England
[28] Univ Tasmania, Ctr Law & Genet, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[29] Univ Basque Country, Fac Law, Leioa, Spain
[30] Natl Univ Adv Legal Studies, Kochi, Kerala, India
[31] Univ Iowa, Coll Law, Iowa City, IA USA
[32] Univ Louisville, Inst Bioeth Hlth Policy & Law, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[33] Healthfox US Inc, Salo, Finland
[34] McGill Univ, Dept Human Genet, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[35] Univ Delhi, Fac Law, Delhi, India
[36] York Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Adm, Toronto, ON, Canada
[37] Monash Univ, Publ Hlth Genom, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[38] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Ctr Sociol Res Ctr Sociol Res, Leuven, Belgium
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.35355
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Importance Governments worldwide have become increasingly cognizant of the spread of genetic discrimination (negative treatment or harm on the basis of actual or presumed genetic characteristics). Despite efforts by a number of governments to establish regulations addressing this phenomenon, public concern about genetic discrimination persists. Objective To identify key elements of an optimal genetic nondiscrimination policy and inform policymakers as they seek to allay genetic nondiscrimination and related public anxieties. Evidence Review Sixty multidisciplinary experts from 20 jurisdictions worldwide were consulted to understand their views on effective genetic nondiscrimination policies. Following standard requirements of the Delphi method, 3 rounds of surveys over the course of 1.5 years were conducted. Round 1 focused on assessing participants' understanding of the intricacies of existing genetic nondiscrimination policies, while rounds 2 and 3 invited participants to reflect on specific means of implementing a more effective regime. A total of 60 respondents participated in the first round, 53 participated in round 2, and 43 participated in round 3. Findings While responses varied across disciplines, there was consensus that binding regulations that reach across various sectors are most useful in preventing genetic discrimination. Overall, experts agreed that human rights-based approaches are well suited to preventing genetic discrimination. Experts also agreed that explicit prohibition of genetic discrimination within nondiscrimination policies can highlight the importance of genetic nondiscrimination as a fundamental right and ensure robust protection at a national level. While most participants believed the international harmonization of genetic nondiscrimination laws would facilitate data sharing worldwide, they also recognized that regulations must reflect the sociocultural differences that exist among regions. Conclusions and Relevance As the reach of genetic discrimination continues to evolve alongside developments in genomics, strategic policy responses that are harmonious at the international and state levels will be critical to address this phenomenon. In seeking to establish comprehensive frameworks, policymakers will need to be mindful of regional and local circumstances that influence the need for and efficacy of unique genetic nondiscrimination approaches across diverse contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Development of a Consensus Statement on Normal Physiologic Birth: A Modified Delphi Study
    Kennedy, Holly Powell
    Cheyney, Melissa
    Lawlor, Mary
    Myers, Suzy
    Schuiling, Kerri
    Tanner, Tanya
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2015, 60 (02) : 140 - 145
  • [32] A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature
    Rinellaa, Mary E.
    V. Lazarusb, Jeffrey
    Ratziud, Vlad
    Francquee, Sven M.
    Sanyalg, Arun J.
    Kanwalh, Fasiha
    Romerob, Diana
    Abdelmalekj, Manal F.
    Ansteek, Quentin M.
    Arabm, Juan Pablo
    Arreseo, Marco
    Batallerq, Ramon
    Beuersr, Ulrich
    Boursiers, Jerome
    Bugianesit, Elisabetta
    Byrneu, Christopher D.
    Narrop, Graciela E. Castro
    Chowdhuryy, Abhijit
    Cortez-Pintoaa, Helena
    Cryerab, Donna R.
    Cusiac, Kenneth
    El-Kassasad, Mohamed
    Kleinae, Samuel
    Eskridgeaf, Wayne
    Fanag, Jiangao
    Gawriehah, Samer
    Guyai, Cynthia D.
    Harrisonaj, Stephen A.
    Kimak, Seung Up
    Kootal, Bart G.
    Korenjakam, Marko
    Kowdleyan, Kris
    Lacailleao, Florence
    Loombaap, Rohit
    Mitchell-Thainaq, Robert
    Morganaran, Timothy R.
    E. Powell, Elisabeth
    Roden, Michael
    Romero-Gomez, Manuel
    Silvaba, Marcelo
    Singhbb, Shivaram Prasad
    Sookoiano, Silvia C.
    Spearmanbe, C. Wendy
    Tiniakosk, Dina
    Valentibg, Luca
    Vosbi, Miriam B.
    Wongbj, Vincent Wai-Sun
    Xanthakosbk, Stavra
    Yilmaz, Yusuf
    Younossibm, Zobair
    ANNALS OF HEPATOLOGY, 2024, 29 (01)
  • [33] Improving assessment and management of pain in hemophilia: an Italian Delphi consensus statement
    Santoro, Cristina
    Di Minno, Matteo Nicola Dario
    Corcione, Antonio
    Di Minno, Giovanni
    Martinelli, Marco
    Mancuso, Maria Elisa
    Acone, Benedetto
    Molinari, Angelo Claudio
    Passeri, Emilio Valter
    Rocino, Angiola
    Santoro, Rita Carlotta
    Tagliaferri, Annarita
    Mattia, Consalvo
    BLOOD REVIEWS, 2022, 51
  • [34] Key capabilities required for podiatry graduates: A Delphi consensus study
    Munteanu, Shannon E.
    Cotchett, Matthew
    Oates, Matthew J.
    Frescos, Nicoletta
    Chuter, Vivienne
    Frecklington, Mike
    Butler, Marie T.
    Haley, Nick W.
    Menz, Hylton B.
    JOURNAL OF FOOT AND ANKLE RESEARCH, 2025, 18 (01)
  • [35] USE OF THE DELPHI CONSENSUS TECHNIQUE TO DETERMINE KEY ELEMENTS OF STEPPING ON
    Gobel, V. L.
    Schlotthauer, A. E.
    Mahoney, J. E.
    Clemson, L. M.
    Mack, K. A.
    Shea, T.
    Cech, S. F.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2012, 52 : 479 - 479
  • [36] Brodalumab for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: An Expert Delphi Consensus Statement
    Fargnoli, Maria Concetta
    Bardazzi, Federico
    Bianchi, Luca
    Dapavo, Paolo
    Fabbrocini, Gabriella
    Gisondi, Paolo
    Micali, Giuseppe
    Offidani, Anna Maria
    Pellacani, Giovanni
    Skroza, Nevena
    Angileri, Rosa Giuseppa
    Burlando, Martina
    Campanati, Anna
    Carrera, Carlo Giovanni
    Chiricozzi, Andrea
    Conti, Andrea
    Simone, Clara De
    Di Lernia, Vito
    Errichetti, Enzo
    Galluzzo, Marco
    Guarneri, Claudio
    Lasagni, Claudia
    Lembo, Serena
    Loconsole, Francesco
    Megna, Matteo
    Musumeci, Maria Letizia
    Prignano, Francesca
    Richetta, Antonio Giovanni
    Trovato, Emanuele
    Venturini, Marina
    Peris, Ketty
    Pinton, Piergiacomo Calzavara
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (10)
  • [37] Commentary Review of diversity, equity, and inclusion by ethics committees: A Delphi consensus statement
    Meloney, Laura G.
    Ahmed, Hayat
    Bierer, Barbara E.
    MED, 2023, 4 (08): : 497 - 504
  • [38] The future of general surgery training: A Canadian resident nationwide Delphi consensus statement
    Huynh, Caroline
    Wong-Chong, Nathalie
    Vourtzoumis, Phil
    Lim, Stephanie
    Marini, Wanda
    Johal, Gurp
    Strickland, Matt
    Madani, Amin
    SURGERY, 2019, 166 (05) : 726 - 734
  • [39] The first consensus statement on revisional bariatric surgery using a modified Delphi approach
    Mahawar, Kamal K.
    Himpens, Jacques M.
    Shikora, Scott A.
    Ramos, Almino C.
    Torres, Antonio
    Somers, Shaw
    Dillemans, Bruno
    Angrisani, Luigi
    Greve, Jan Willem M.
    Chevallier, Jean-Marc
    Chowbey, Pradeep
    De Luca, Maurizio
    Weiner, Rudolf
    Prager, Gerhard
    Vilallonga, Ramon
    Adamo, Marco
    Sakran, Nasser
    Kow, Lilian
    Lakdawala, Mufazzal
    Dargent, Jerome
    Nimeri, Abdelrahman
    Small, Peter K.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (04): : 1648 - 1657
  • [40] Discussion on the paper: “When to intervene in the caries process? An expert Delphi consensus statement”
    Jan Kühnisch
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2020, 24 : 1865 - 1867