Comparison of Small Rotor Tonal and Random Noise Decomposition Methods

被引:0
|
作者
Malkki, Justin [1 ]
Yauwenas, Yendrew [1 ]
Doolan, Con [1 ]
Moreau, Danielle [1 ]
机构
[1] UNSW Sydney, Sch Mech & Mfg Engn, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
sUAS; Isolated rotor; Edgewise flight; Far-field acoustics; Tonal and broadband decomposition; SOUND;
D O I
10.1007/s40857-024-00333-z
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
This paper examines and compares methods of separating tonal and broadband components of the noise generated by small rotors as commonly found on small unmanned aerial systems (sUAS). Time synchronous analysis (TSA) methods with varying averaging algorithms, such as ensemble averaging (EA), exponential weighted moving averaging (EWMA) and Kalman filter averaging (KFA), are compared against themselves and against a cross-correlation-based method. The decomposition methods are used on noise measurements of a small isolated rotor under static operation and edgewise flight conditions at 10 m/s in the UNSW anechoic wind tunnel (UAT). The best method for isolating tones is TSA-EWMA and for isolating the broadband spectrum of noise is the cross-correlation method, based on the spectral reconstruction of the experimental data.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 337
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Employing the Empirical Mode Decomposition to Denoise the Random Telegraph Noise
    Moshrefi, A.
    Aghababa, H.
    Shoaei, O.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, 2021, 34 (01): : 90 - 96
  • [42] A comparison of structural CSP decomposition methods
    Gottlob, G
    Leone, N
    Scarcello, F
    IJCAI-99: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTEENTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOLS 1 & 2, 1999, : 394 - 399
  • [43] A comparison of structural CSP decomposition methods
    Gottlob, G
    Leone, N
    Scarcello, F
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2000, 124 (02) : 243 - 282
  • [44] Youla Parameterized Adaptive Feedback Attenuation Against Tonal and Band-Limited Random Noise in Ductworks
    Qian, Fanfan
    Li, Feng
    Wu, Zhizheng
    Yue, Tengfei
    Xu, Tingyue
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2022, 69 (08) : 8274 - 8283
  • [45] COMPARISON OF 4 RANDOM TO GRID METHODS
    BRAILE, LW
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 1978, 4 (04) : 341 - 349
  • [46] RANDOM DIGIT DIALING - A COMPARISON OF METHODS
    SEGAL, MN
    HEKMAT, F
    JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 1985, 14 (04) : 36 - 43
  • [47] Noise transfer analysis of base material decomposition methods
    Heismanna, Bjorn J.
    Medical Imaging 2007: Physics of Medical Imaging, Pts 1-3, 2007, 6510 : U351 - U356
  • [48] COMPARISON OF IF ESTIMATION METHODS FOR NOISE ROBUSTNESS
    Narayana, K. V. S.
    Sreenivas, T. V.
    2008 IEEE REGION 10 CONFERENCE: TENCON 2008, VOLS 1-4, 2008, : 1285 - 1290
  • [49] Train Noise - Comparison of Prediction Methods
    Nemec, M.
    Danihelova, A.
    Gejdos, M.
    Gergel', T.
    Danihelova, Z.
    Suchomel, J.
    Culik, M.
    ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA A, 2015, 127 (01) : 125 - 127
  • [50] COMPARISON OF NOISE SPECTRA OF SMALL MOTORS
    EGHTESADI, K
    ENGINEERING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE CONTROL, VOLS 1 AND 2: INTER-NOISE 89, 1989, : 163 - 166